Suppr超能文献

类风湿因子亚型在类风湿关节炎诊断和预后中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2023 Aug;9(3). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002817.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The first biomarker associated with the rheumatoid arthritis is rheumatoid factor (RF) and since the earliest reports a role has been proposed in the diagnosis and in the prediction of clinical features and outcome. The study of RF isotypes has further attempted to improve diagnostic accuracy and identify specific subgroups of patients. The main objective of this study is to provide an analysis of the literature on the role of RF isotypes in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the role of RF isotypes in RA (only in English, from PubMed, search terms: "rheumatoid factor isotypes", "diagnosis", "prognosis" and "rheumatoid arthritis", last search 31 July 2022, two independent assessment of quality and biases, results included in tables and in the meta-analysis).

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles were examined (7517 patients). Testing all RF isotypes with latex test or nephelometry allows for the highest sensitivity (68.6%, 95% CI 66.2% to 71.0%); nonetheless, the determination of IgA isotype provides the highest specificity (91.4%, 95% CI 90.8% to 92.0%) and the highest positive likelihood ratio (7.7, 95% CI 5.7 to 10.4). When testing IgM isotype the highest diagnostic OR (21.7, 95% CI 16.1 to 29.3) is reached. When analysing anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, RF isotype determination increases diagnostic accuracy. On the other hand, these do not provide relevant prognostic information, as results are conflicting.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing RF allows the highest sensitivity, while IgA isotype the highest specificity and positive likelihood ratio for RA diagnosis. On the other hand, determination of RF isotypes dose not allow prognostic information, as data are limited and heterogeneous.

摘要

目的

与类风湿关节炎相关的首个生物标志物是类风湿因子(RF),自最早的报告以来,RF 已被提出用于诊断以及预测临床特征和结局。对 RF 同种型的研究进一步试图提高诊断准确性并识别特定的患者亚组。本研究的主要目的是提供对 RF 同种型在类风湿关节炎(RA)诊断和预后中的作用的文献分析。

方法

我们对 RF 同种型在 RA 中的作用进行了系统的文献复习和荟萃分析(仅为英语,来自 PubMed,检索词:“rheumatoid factor isotypes”、“diagnosis”、“prognosis”和“rheumatoid arthritis”,最后一次检索为 2022 年 7 月 31 日,两名独立评估质量和偏倚,结果列入表格和荟萃分析中)。

结果

共检查了 36 篇文章(7517 例患者)。使用乳胶试验或比浊法检测所有 RF 同种型可获得最高的敏感性(68.6%,95%CI 66.2%至 71.0%);然而,IgA 同种型的测定提供了最高的特异性(91.4%,95%CI 90.8%至 92.0%)和最高的阳性似然比(7.7,95%CI 5.7 至 10.4)。当检测 IgM 同种型时,获得了最高的诊断 OR(21.7,95%CI 16.1 至 29.3)。在分析抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体时,RF 同种型测定提高了诊断准确性。另一方面,这些并不能提供相关的预后信息,因为结果存在冲突。

结论

检测 RF 可获得最高的敏感性,而 IgA 同种型可获得 RA 诊断的最高特异性和阳性似然比。另一方面,RF 同种型的测定不能提供预后信息,因为数据有限且存在异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e190/10407415/b29ac95d7e67/rmdopen-2022-002817f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验