Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术后预防术后神经功能缺损。血小板抑制有益吗?

Prevention of postoperative neurologic deficits after carotid endarterectomy. Is platelet inhibition beneficial?

作者信息

Rosenthal D, Lamis P A, Stanton P E, Clark M D, Ellison R G

出版信息

Am Surg. 1987 Jun;53(6):329-32.

PMID:3579047
Abstract

Aspirin (ASA) and dipyridamole (DIP) have been shown to reduce the incidence of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), but aspirin's ability to reduce the incidence of postoperative neurologic deficits in patients who require carotid endarterectomy (CE) is controversial. To evaluate the role of adjunctive ASA/DIP in conjunction with CE, 908 CE cases were reviewed. Four hundred sixty-seven patients took ASA (650 mg/day) and DIP (150 mg/day) preoperatively, while 381 received no ASA/DIP. There was no statistical difference in the distribution of postoperative neurologic deficits. Twenty-six transient deficits occurred: 14 (53%) patients were taking ASA/DIP, whereas 12 (47%) were not. Seventeen permanent deficits occurred: ten (58%) patients were taking ASA/DIP and seven (42%) were not. ASA/DIP are useful medications in combating ischemic cerebrovascular disease, but ASA/DIP cannot replace precise operative technique which affords unequaled protection against a postendarterectomy neurologic deficit.

摘要

阿司匹林(ASA)和双嘧达莫(DIP)已被证明可降低短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的发生率,但阿司匹林在降低需要进行颈动脉内膜切除术(CE)的患者术后神经功能缺损发生率方面的能力存在争议。为了评估ASA/DIP辅助治疗联合CE的作用,回顾了908例CE病例。467例患者术前服用ASA(650毫克/天)和DIP(150毫克/天),而381例未接受ASA/DIP治疗。术后神经功能缺损的分布没有统计学差异。发生了26例短暂性缺损:14例(53%)患者服用ASA/DIP,而12例(47%)未服用。发生了17例永久性缺损:10例(58%)患者服用ASA/DIP,7例(42%)未服用。ASA/DIP是治疗缺血性脑血管疾病的有用药物,但ASA/DIP不能替代精确的手术技术,而精确的手术技术能为预防动脉内膜切除术后神经功能缺损提供无与伦比的保护。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验