Imperial College London, London, UK.
Centre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin.
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 5;13(1):3862. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30700-1.
The cause of malaria transmission has been known for over a century but it is still unclear whether entomological measures are sufficiently reliable to inform policy decisions in human health. Decision-making on the effectiveness of new insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and the indoor residual spraying of insecticide (IRS) have been based on epidemiological data, typically collected in cluster-randomised control trials. The number of these trials that can be conducted is limited. Here we use a systematic review to highlight that efficacy estimates of the same intervention may vary substantially between trials. Analyses indicate that mosquito data collected in experimental hut trials can be used to parameterize mechanistic models for Plasmodium falciparum malaria and reliably predict the epidemiological efficacy of quick-acting, neuro-acting ITNs and IRS. Results suggest that for certain types of ITNs and IRS using this framework instead of clinical endpoints could support policy and expedite the widespread use of novel technologies.
疟疾传播的原因已经有一个多世纪的历史了,但仍不清楚昆虫学措施是否足够可靠,以告知人类健康方面的政策决策。新的杀虫剂处理过的蚊帐 (ITN) 和室内残留喷洒杀虫剂 (IRS) 的有效性的决策一直基于流行病学数据,这些数据通常是在整群随机对照试验中收集的。可以进行的这类试验的数量是有限的。在这里,我们使用系统评价来强调,同一干预措施的疗效估计可能在试验之间有很大差异。分析表明,在实验棚试验中收集的蚊子数据可用于为恶性疟原虫疟疾的机械模型提供参数,并可靠地预测快速作用、神经作用的 ITN 和 IRS 的流行病学疗效。结果表明,对于某些类型的 ITN 和 IRS,使用该框架而不是临床终点,可以支持政策并加速新型技术的广泛应用。