Suppr超能文献

在埃塞俄比亚进行的一项实验性小屋研究,评估了仅使用拟除虫菊酯和单独使用 PBO 蚊帐以及与基于吡丙醚的 IRS 联合使用的效果。

An experimental hut study evaluating the impact of pyrethroid-only and PBO nets alone and in combination with pirimiphos-methyl-based IRS in Ethiopia.

机构信息

School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Tropical and Infectious Diseases Research Center, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Malar J. 2022 Aug 20;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04263-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pyrethroid resistance observed in populations of malaria vectors is widespread in Ethiopia and could potentially compromise the effectiveness of insecticide-based malaria vector control interventions. In this study, the impact of combining indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) on mosquito behaviour and mortality was evaluated using experimental huts.

METHODS

A Latin Square Design was employed using six experimental huts to collect entomological data. Human volunteers slept in huts with different types of nets (pyrethroid-only net, PBO net, and untreated net) either with or without IRS (Actellic 300CS). The hut with no IRS and an untreated net served as a negative control. The study was conducted for a total of 54 nights. Both alive and dead mosquitoes were collected from inside nets, in the central rooms and verandah the following morning. Data were analysed using Stata/SE 14.0 software package (College Station, TX, USA).

RESULTS

The personal protection rate of huts with PermaNet® 2.0 alone and PermaNet® 3.0 alone was 33.3% and 50%, respectively. The mean killing effect of huts with PermaNet® 2.0 alone and PermaNet® 3.0 alone was 2% and 49%, respectively. Huts with PermaNet® 2.0 alone and PermaNet® 3.0 alone demonstrated significantly higher excito-repellency than the control hut. However, mosquito mortality in the hut with IRS + untreated net, hut with IRS + PermaNet® 2.0 and hut with IRS + PermaNet® 3.0 were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). Additionally, pre-exposure of both the susceptible Anopheles arabiensis laboratory strain and wild Anopheles gambiae sensu lato to PBO in the cone bioassay tests of Actellic 300CS sprayed surfaces did not reduce mosquito mortality when compared to mortality without pre-exposure to PBO.

CONCLUSION

Mosquito mortality rates from the huts with IRS alone were similar to mosquito mortality rates from the huts with the combination of vector control intervention tools (IRS + ITNs) and mosquito mortality rates from huts with PBO nets alone were significantly higher than huts with pyrethroid-only nets. The findings of this study help inform studies to be conducted under field condition for decision-making for future selection of cost-effective vector control intervention tools.

摘要

背景

在疟疾传播媒介种群中观察到的拟除虫菊酯抗性在埃塞俄比亚广泛存在,可能会影响以杀虫剂为基础的疟疾传播媒介控制干预措施的效果。本研究采用实验小屋评估了室内滞留喷洒(IRS)和经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)联合使用对蚊子行为和死亡率的影响。

方法

采用拉丁方设计,使用六个实验小屋收集昆虫学数据。志愿者在带有不同类型蚊帐(仅含拟除虫菊酯的蚊帐、PBO 蚊帐和未处理的蚊帐)的小屋里睡觉,这些小屋有的进行了 IRS(Actellic 300CS),有的没有。没有 IRS 和未处理的蚊帐的小屋作为阴性对照。这项研究共进行了 54 晚。第二天早上,从内部蚊帐、中央房间和阳台收集活蚊和死蚊。使用 Stata/SE 14.0 软件包(美国得克萨斯州大学城)分析数据。

结果

PermaNet® 2.0 单独使用和 PermaNet® 3.0 单独使用的个人保护率分别为 33.3%和 50%。PermaNet® 2.0 单独使用和 PermaNet® 3.0 单独使用的平均杀灭效果分别为 2%和 49%。PermaNet® 2.0 单独使用和 PermaNet® 3.0 单独使用的小屋的激扰驱避作用明显高于对照小屋。然而,IRS+未处理蚊帐小屋、IRS+PermaNet® 2.0 小屋和 IRS+PermaNet® 3.0 小屋的蚊子死亡率彼此之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。此外,在 Actellic 300CS 喷雾表面的锥体生物测定试验中,预先接触 PBO 并没有降低敏感的按蚊实验室品系和野生冈比亚按蚊的感虫率,与没有预先接触 PBO 的死亡率相比。

结论

IRS 单独使用的小屋的蚊子死亡率与联合使用媒介控制干预工具(IRS+ITN)的小屋的蚊子死亡率相似,而单独使用 PBO 蚊帐的小屋的蚊子死亡率明显高于仅使用拟除虫菊酯的蚊帐的小屋。本研究结果有助于为未来更经济有效的媒介控制干预工具的选择提供决策依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95ce/9392245/c412d98192b5/12936_2022_4263_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验