Senni Michele, Alemayehu Wendimagegn G, Sim David, Edelmann Frank, Butler Javed, Ezekowitz Justin, Hernandez Adrian F, Lam Carolyn S P, O'Connor Christopher M, Pieske Burkert, Ponikowski Piotr, Roessig Lothar, Voors Adriaan A, Westerhout Cynthia M, McMullan Ciaran, Armstrong Paul W
University of Milan - Bicocca, Milan, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Sep;24(9):1614-1622. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2608. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
We assessed a subset of the 5040 patients in VICTORIA receiving sacubitril/valsartan, either at randomization (n = 731) or post-randomization drop-in use (n = 425), to evaluate the relationship between the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vericiguat.
The efficacy of vericiguat on the primary composite endpoint, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and all-cause mortality was assessed. Safety outcomes included symptomatic hypotension, syncope, worsening renal function, and hyperkalaemia. At randomization, 731 patients received sacubitril/valsartan; they were more frequently from Western Europe or North America, had lower ejection fraction and systolic blood pressure, and more use of triple background HF therapy (65.9% vs. 58.6%), biventricular pacemakers (17.9% vs. 14.1%), or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (42.3% vs. 25.3%). For patients on versus not on sacubitril/valsartan at randomization, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for vericiguat's treatment effect on the primary composite outcome, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization were 0.92 (0.71-1.19) versus 0.89 (0.80-0.98), 0.71 (0.45-1.12) versus 0.95 (0.82-1.11), and 0.98 (0.74-1.29) versus 0.87 (0.78-0.98), respectively. No significant interaction existed between sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat's treatment effect (p-values for interaction: 0.81, 0.23 and 0.47, respectively). Post-randomization, more drop-in sacubitril/valsartan use occurred in those assigned to placebo (n = 238) versus vericiguat (n = 187) (p = 0.007). Symptomatic hypotension (21.0% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.41), renal dysfunction (29.9% vs. 31.9%; p = 0.50), and hyperkalaemia (10.3% vs. 7.9%; p = 0.20) in patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan (n = 992) for ≥3 months were not different by treatment arm.
Concomitant use of sacubitril/valsartan for at least 3 months did not alter the efficacy of vericiguat and was similarly safe and tolerated in both study arms. Sacubitril/valsartan was initiated more frequently after randomization in patients assigned to placebo versus vericiguat.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02861534.
我们评估了维多利亚研究中5040例接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗患者的一个子集,这些患者在随机分组时(n = 731)或随机分组后转而使用该药(n = 425),以评估维立西呱联合治疗的疗效与安全性之间的关系。
评估了维立西呱对主要复合终点、心力衰竭(HF)住院和全因死亡率的疗效。安全性结局包括症状性低血压、晕厥、肾功能恶化和高钾血症。随机分组时,731例患者接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗;他们更多来自西欧或北美,射血分数和收缩压较低,三联背景HF治疗(65.9%对58.6%)、双心室起搏器(17.9%对14.1%)或植入式心脏复律除颤器(42.3%对25.3%)的使用更为频繁。对于随机分组时接受与未接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的患者,维立西呱对主要复合结局、心血管死亡和HF住院的治疗效果的调整风险比(95%置信区间)分别为0.92(0.71 - 1.19)对0.89(0.80 - 0.98)、0.71(0.45 - 1.12)对0.95(0.82 - 1.11)、0.98(0.74 - 1.29)对0.87(0.78 - 0.98)。沙库巴曲缬沙坦与维立西呱的治疗效果之间不存在显著交互作用(交互作用的p值分别为0.81、0.23和0.47)。随机分组后,分配至安慰剂组(n = 238)的患者比分配至维立西呱组(n = 187)的患者更多转而使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦(p = 0.007)。接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗≥3个月的患者(n = 992)中,症状性低血压(21.0%对23.1%;p = 0.41)、肾功能不全(29.9%对31.9%;p = 0.50)和高钾血症(10.3%对7.9%;p = 0.20)在各治疗组之间无差异。
同时使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦至少3个月不会改变维立西呱的疗效,且在两个研究组中安全性和耐受性相似。随机分组后,分配至安慰剂组的患者比分配至维立西呱组的患者更频繁地开始使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02861534