Suppr超能文献

使用连续血糖监测三个月,确定与 HbA1c≤7% 相关的时间在 1 型糖尿病患者前瞻性队列中的比例。

Determination of Time in Range Associated With HbA1c ≤7% in a Prospective Cohort of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Three Months.

机构信息

Endocrinology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Mar;18(2):345-350. doi: 10.1177/19322968221108424. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Finding a goal of time in range (%TIR) that defines good glycemic control is necessary. Previous retrospective studies suggest good concordance between HbA1c ≤7% with a TIR >70%; however, the studies that included the largest number of patients used blood glucose measurement data with a follow-up time of less than 90 days. This study defined the TIR value that best discriminates HbA1c ≤7%.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of diagnostic tests based on a cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with a hybrid closed loop (HCL) followed for three months. The ability of %TIR to distinguish patients with HbA1c ≤7% was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We determined the %TIR cutoff point with the best operating characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included (58.1% women, 47% overweight or obese, and 33% with high glycemic variability). A moderate negative correlation ( = -.54, < .001) was found between %TIR and HbA1c. The discrimination ability was moderate, with an area under the curve of 0.7485 (95% confidence interval = 0.6608-0.8363). The cutoff point that best predicted HbA1c ≤7% was %TIR ≥75.5 (sensitivity 70%, specificity 67%). The findings were similar among those with a coefficient of variation (CV%) ≥36%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the %TIR adequately identifies patients with HbA1c ≤7%. A target of TIR ≥75%, rather than the currently recommended TIR ≥70%, may be a more suitable value for optimal glycemic control.

摘要

简介

寻找一个能够定义良好血糖控制的时间范围内血糖(%TIR)目标是必要的。先前的回顾性研究表明,HbA1c≤7%与 TIR>70%之间具有良好的一致性;然而,纳入患者数量最多的研究使用的是随访时间少于 90 天的血糖测量数据。本研究定义了能够最佳区分 HbA1c≤7%的 TIR 值。

方法

我们对接受混合闭环(HCL)治疗的 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,这些患者随访了三个月。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析评估了 %TIR 区分 HbA1c≤7%患者的能力。我们确定了具有最佳工作特征的 %TIR 截止点。

结果

共纳入 118 例患者(58.1%为女性,47%超重或肥胖,33%血糖波动较大)。%TIR 与 HbA1c 呈中度负相关(=-.54,<0.001)。其区分能力为中度,曲线下面积为 0.7485(95%置信区间为 0.6608-0.8363)。预测 HbA1c≤7%的最佳截止点为 %TIR≥75.5(敏感性 70%,特异性 67%)。在变异系数(CV%)≥36%的患者中,结果相似。

结论

我们的数据表明,%TIR 可以充分识别 HbA1c≤7%的患者。TIR≥75%,而不是目前推荐的 TIR≥70%,可能是实现最佳血糖控制的更合适的目标。

相似文献

10

本文引用的文献

3
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S73-S84. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S006.
7
Positioning time in range in diabetes management.糖尿病管理中的定位时间在范围内。
Diabetologia. 2020 Feb;63(2):242-252. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05027-0. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验