• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从美国计划生育服务提供者的角度看政策变化的影响:一项定性研究的结果。

The impact of policy changes from the perspective of providers of family planning care in the US: results from a qualitative study.

机构信息

Senior Research Scientist, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.

Research Associate, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2089322. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2089322.

DOI:10.1080/26410397.2022.2089322
PMID:35791904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9262356/
Abstract

In recent years, there have been several state and federal policies that have disrupted access to publicly supported family planning care in the United States, including the 2019 rule that altered the federal Title X family planning program. In late 2020, we conducted in-depth interviews with health care providers from 55 facilities providing family planning care in Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin with the aim of learning how sites were affected by policy changes. We identified perceived effects on clinic finances, patient confidentiality, contraceptive counselling and service provision, and options counselling resulting from state and federal policy changes. Some clinics lost funding and had to pass some of the cost of services on to patients, raising new confidentiality concerns and creating new burdens on staff to carry out financial counselling with patients. Other sites had to grapple with restrictions on the pregnancy options counselling that they could provide, concentrate counselling on fertility awareness-based methods, and increase efforts to include parents/guardians in the care of adolescent patients. State and federal policies impact how publicly supported family planning care is provided, and compromise efforts to provide patient-centred care.

摘要

近年来,美国有几项州和联邦政策扰乱了公众支持的计划生育保健服务的获取,包括 2019 年改变联邦计划生育 X 标题项目的规定。2020 年底,我们对亚利桑那州、爱荷华州和威斯康星州 55 家提供计划生育服务的医疗机构的医疗服务提供者进行了深入访谈,旨在了解这些机构如何受到政策变化的影响。我们确定了州和联邦政策变化对诊所财务、患者保密性、避孕咨询和服务提供以及选择咨询的影响。一些诊所失去了资金,不得不将部分服务费用转嫁给患者,这引发了新的保密性问题,并给工作人员带来了新的负担,需要与患者一起进行财务咨询。其他诊所则不得不应对提供的妊娠选择咨询的限制,专注于生育意识为基础的方法的咨询,并增加努力,让父母/监护人参与青少年患者的护理。州和联邦政策影响着公众支持的计划生育保健服务的提供方式,并损害了以患者为中心的护理服务。

相似文献

1
The impact of policy changes from the perspective of providers of family planning care in the US: results from a qualitative study.从美国计划生育服务提供者的角度看政策变化的影响:一项定性研究的结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2089322. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2089322.
2
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
3
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
4
Clinic provision of contraceptive services to managed care enrollees.为管理式医疗参保人提供避孕服务的临床实践。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jul-Aug;30(4):156-62.
5
A qualitative study of safe abortion and post-abortion family planning service experiences of women attending private facilities in Kenya.肯尼亚私人医疗机构中接受人工流产和人工流产后计划生育服务的女性的安全流产及计划生育服务经历的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 24;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0509-4.
6
Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994.1994年美国的计划生育诊所服务
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 May-Jun;28(3):92-100.
7
Family planning service provision in rural areas: a survey in Washington State.农村地区的计划生育服务提供情况:华盛顿州的一项调查
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 May-Jun;30(3):139-42, 147.
8
Provision of contraceptive and related services by publicly funded family planning clinics, 2003.2003年由公共资助的计划生育诊所提供的避孕及相关服务
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Sep;38(3):139-47. doi: 10.1363/psrh.38.139.06.
9
Adolescent Access to Federally Funded Clinics Providing Confidential Family Planning Following Changes to Title X Funding Regulations.青少年获得联邦资金资助的诊所提供保密的计划生育服务,这些诊所是根据 Title X 资金法规的变化而设立的。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2217488. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17488.
10
Insurance-related Practices at Title X-funded Family Planning Centers under the Affordable Care Act: Survey and Interview Findings.平价医疗法案下,接受 Title X 资助的计划生育服务中心的保险相关实践:调查和访谈结果。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Title X Policy Shifts and Michigan's Reproductive Health Safety Net.第十章政策转变与密歇根州的生殖健康安全网
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522203. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22203.
2
Improving Access to Contraception Care at a Local Nonprofit Clinic: A Quality Improvement Project.改善当地非营利性诊所的避孕护理服务:一项质量改进项目。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2025 Apr;27(2):286-293. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01660-z. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
3
Early national trends in non-abortion reproductive care access after .在 之后,非堕胎生殖保健服务获取的早期全国趋势。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 8;12:1309068. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1309068. eCollection 2024.
4
Provision of DMPA-SC for self-administration in different practice settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from providers across the United States.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在不同的实践环境中提供 DMPA-SC 供自我管理:来自美国各地提供者的数据。
Contraception. 2024 Mar;131:110360. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110360. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
5
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on publicly supported clinics providing contraceptive services in four US states.新冠疫情对美国四个州提供避孕服务的公立诊所的影响。
Contracept X. 2023 Jul 5;5:100096. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100096. eCollection 2023.
6
Changes in the Frequency and Type of Barriers to Reproductive Health Care Between 2017 and 2021.2017 年至 2021 年期间,生殖健康护理障碍的频率和类型发生变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e237461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7461.
7
Patient's experience and satisfaction with self-administered subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use during the first year of COVID-19.患者在 COVID-19 第一年期间自行皮下注射 depot 醋酸甲羟孕酮的体验和满意度。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110008. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110008. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive access: a person-centered framework for advancing high-quality, equitable contraceptive care.超越当日长效可逆避孕措施的可及性:以患者为中心的框架,推进高质量、公平的避孕护理。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S878.e1-S878.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1279. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
2
US abortion gag: clinics that leave family planning programme may have to destroy contraceptives.美国堕胎限制令:退出计划生育项目的诊所可能必须销毁避孕药具。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 31;366:l4969. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4969.
3
Proposed Title X Regulatory Changes: Silencing Health Care Providers and Undermining Quality of Care.提议的标题X监管变化:压制医疗服务提供者并损害医疗质量。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Nov-Dec;28(6):477-479. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
5
Providing Family Planning Services at Primary Care Organizations after the Exclusion of Planned Parenthood from Publicly Funded Programs in Texas: Early Qualitative Evidence.在德克萨斯州将计划生育组织从公共资助项目中排除后,在初级保健组织中提供计划生育服务:早期定性证据。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2770-2786. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12783. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Effect of Removal of Planned Parenthood from the Texas Women's Health Program.从德克萨斯州妇女健康计划中移除计划生育服务的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):853-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1511902. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
Development and validation of a reproductive autonomy scale.生殖自主权量表的编制与验证。
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Mar;45(1):19-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00374.x.