• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第十章政策转变与密歇根州的生殖健康安全网

Title X Policy Shifts and Michigan's Reproductive Health Safety Net.

作者信息

Compton Sarah D, Pangori Andrea, Widner Audrey, Davis-Wilson Kamilah, Wallett Sarah, Dalton Vanessa K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Planned Parenthood of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522203. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22203.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22203
PMID:40690214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12281240/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Title X Family Planning Program is a US federal grant program designed to offer comprehensive and confidential family planning and preventive health services to individuals in the US, regardless of their ability to pay. In 2019, a major change to the program-called the Final Rule-led to about 25% of participating clinics, including all Planned Parenthood affiliates, leaving the Title X program. Because Planned Parenthood of Michigan (PPMI) had served about 70% of Michigan's Title X clients, its withdrawal from Michigan's Title X program was anticipated to significantly alter the service coverage provided by the Title X program in the state.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the changes in geographic distribution, organizational profiles, and service delivery volumes of Title X health centers in Michigan-including those that left the program and then rejoined-before and after the implementation of the Final Rule.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included Title X-funded health centers in Michigan's 83 counties from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023.

EXPOSURE

The enactment and reversal of the Title X Final Rule.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Changes in service delivery volume, seen in (1) Title X penetration rate (number of unique females served at Title X-funded health centers), (2) PPMI penetration rate (number of unique females served by PPMI), and (3) reproductive health safety net penetration rate (sum of the females served by the Title X program and PPMI during the years it was excluded from Title X).

RESULTS

Title X service delivery counts decreased from 92 clinics before the implementation of the Final Rule in 2019 to 76 clinics during the Final Rule and increased to 92 after reversal of the Final Rule. Penetration rates were significantly higher before implementation of the Final Rule (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 3.98; 95% CI, 3.93-4.02) and after the Final Rule period (IRR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.93-3.00). However, when PPMI service counts were included during the Final Rule period when PPMI was not formally part of Title X, there was considerably more stability in service delivery rates across the 3 periods (preperiod vs Final Rule period: IRR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.32-1.34; and postperiod vs Final Rule period: IRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00). The mean PPMI penetration rate was only 1.41 times higher in the preperiod than in the Final Rule period (IRR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.40-1.43).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study highlights PPMI's role in the state's Title X program and overall reproductive health safety net. During the relatively short time the Final Rule was in place, PPMI was able to maintain service delivery, protecting the public's health against these regulations. It is not clear if PPMI, or similar organizations, could maintain service delivery over a longer period.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77ed/12281240/e5713f4366b2/jamanetwopen-e2522203-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77ed/12281240/9cec1012f53c/jamanetwopen-e2522203-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77ed/12281240/17ab19cd7b4b/jamanetwopen-e2522203-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77ed/12281240/e5713f4366b2/jamanetwopen-e2522203-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77ed/12281240/9cec1012f53c/jamanetwopen-e2522203-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77ed/12281240/17ab19cd7b4b/jamanetwopen-e2522203-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77ed/12281240/e5713f4366b2/jamanetwopen-e2522203-g003.jpg
摘要

重要性

第十条计划生育项目是一项美国联邦拨款项目,旨在为美国个人提供全面且保密的计划生育及预防性健康服务,无论其支付能力如何。2019年,该项目的一项重大变更——即“最终规则”——导致约25%的参与诊所(包括所有计划生育联合会分支机构)退出第十条项目。由于密歇根州计划生育组织(PPMI)服务了密歇根州约70%的第十条项目客户,预计其退出密歇根州的第十条项目将显著改变该州第十条项目所提供的服务覆盖范围。

目的

研究在“最终规则”实施前后,密歇根州第十条健康中心(包括那些退出项目后又重新加入的中心)在地理分布、组织概况和服务提供量方面的变化。

设计、背景和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了2017年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间密歇根州83个县中由第十条项目资助的健康中心。

暴露因素

第十条“最终规则”的颁布与撤销。

主要结局和指标

服务提供量的变化,体现在(1)第十条渗透率(在第十条项目资助的健康中心接受服务的独特女性数量)、(2)PPMI渗透率(由PPMI服务的独特女性数量)以及(3)生殖健康安全网渗透率(在第十条项目排除PPMI的那些年份里,由第十条项目和PPMI服务的女性总数)。

结果

第十条项目的服务提供诊所数量从2019年“最终规则”实施前的92家减少至“最终规则”实施期间的76家,在“最终规则”撤销后又增加到92家。渗透率在“最终规则”实施前(发病率比值[IRR],3.98;95%置信区间,3.93 - 4.02)和“最终规则”实施后(IRR,2.96;95%置信区间,2.93 - 3.00)显著更高。然而,当在“最终规则”期间将PPMI的服务数量纳入(此时PPMI并非第十条项目的正式组成部分)时,三个时期的服务提供率有了相当大的稳定性(前期与“最终规则”时期:IRR,1.33;95%置信区间1.32 - 1.34;后期与“最终规则”时期:IRR,0.99;95%置信区间,0.98 - 1.00)。前期的平均PPMI渗透率仅比“最终规则”时期高1.41倍(IRR,1.41;95%置信区间,1.40 - 1.43)。

结论及意义

这项队列研究凸显了PPMI在该州第十条项目及整体生殖健康安全网中的作用。在“最终规则 ”实施的相对短时间内,PPMI能够维持服务提供,保护公众健康免受这些规定的影响。目前尚不清楚PPMI或类似组织能否在更长时期内维持服务提供。

相似文献

1
Title X Policy Shifts and Michigan's Reproductive Health Safety Net.第十章政策转变与密歇根州的生殖健康安全网
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522203. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22203.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care.用于预防性医疗保健的手机短信服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007457.pub2.
5
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
7
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
10
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of policy changes from the perspective of providers of family planning care in the US: results from a qualitative study.从美国计划生育服务提供者的角度看政策变化的影响:一项定性研究的结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2089322. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2089322.
2
Trends in Health Insurance Coverage of Title X Family Planning Program Clients, 2005-2015.《2005-2015 年计划生育项目客户的健康保险覆盖趋势》
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 May;27(5):684-690. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6465. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
The availability of community health center services and access to medical care.
社区卫生中心服务的可及性和医疗保健的可及性。
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Dec;5(4):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Differences in Family Planning Services by Rural-urban Geography: Survey of Title X-Supported Clinics In Great Plains and Midwestern States.城乡地域的计划生育服务差异:对大平原和中西部各州第十类计划支持诊所的调查
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Mar;48(1):9-16. doi: 10.1363/48e7116. Epub 2016 Feb 3.