Suppr超能文献

接受头孢克肟(CL 284,635)或头孢克洛治疗的人类肠道菌群变化。

Bowel flora changes in humans receiving cefixime (CL 284,635) or cefaclor.

作者信息

Finegold S M, Ingram-Drake L, Gee R, Reinhardt J, Edelstein M A, MacDonald K, Wexler H

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Mar;31(3):443-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.3.443.

Abstract

Twelve healthy young male subjects received either cefixime, a new oral cephalosporin (CL 284,635), or cefaclor (six subjects on each drug) orally for 2 weeks. In the case of cefixime, single daily doses of 400 mg were taken; with cefaclor, the dosage was 250 mg three times daily. Modest changes in the fecal flora were noted in both drug groups, but the changes were of different types. In the case of cefixime, there was more of an impact on the indigenous flora, and in the case of cefaclor, there was more ingrowth of new flora. With cefixime, Enterobacteriaceae were usually decreased (the decrease in Escherichia coli count was statistically significant), as were counts of clostridia and sometimes Bifidobacterium spp.; the Bacteroides fragilis group was eliminated in one subject. Coincident with these decreases, four subjects had increases in counts of group D streptococci of 3 logs or more. There was new appearance of Clostridium difficile in four subjects and of Staphylococcus aureus in one; four new strains of Enterobacteriaceae appeared. With cefaclor, there was no decrease of E. coli counts; two subjects had elimination of Bifidobacterium spp. There was little change in counts of group D streptococci. On the other hand, there were 13 new strains of Enterobacteriaceae, two of S. aureus, and three of C. difficile.

摘要

12名健康年轻男性受试者口服新的口服头孢菌素头孢克肟(CL 284,635)或头孢克洛(每种药物6名受试者),持续2周。对于头孢克肟,每日单次服用400mg;对于头孢克洛,剂量为每日3次,每次250mg。两个药物组的粪便菌群均有适度变化,但变化类型不同。对于头孢克肟,对本土菌群的影响更大;对于头孢克洛,新菌群的生长更多。使用头孢克肟时,肠杆菌科细菌通常减少(大肠杆菌计数的减少具有统计学意义),梭菌以及有时双歧杆菌属的计数也减少;1名受试者的脆弱拟杆菌群被清除。与这些减少同时发生的是,4名受试者的D组链球菌计数增加了3个对数或更多。4名受试者出现了艰难梭菌,1名受试者出现了金黄色葡萄球菌;出现了4种新的肠杆菌科菌株。使用头孢克洛时,大肠杆菌计数没有减少;2名受试者的双歧杆菌属被清除。D组链球菌计数变化不大。另一方面,出现了13种新的肠杆菌科菌株、2种金黄色葡萄球菌和3种艰难梭菌。

相似文献

3
Safety and efficacy of cefixime versus cefaclor in respiratory tract infections.
J Chemother. 1989 Aug;1(4):257-60. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1989.11738903.
7
[Effects of cefixime and cefaclor on pharyngeal flora in children].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1991 May;65(5):546-51. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.546.

引用本文的文献

4
Effect of a single dose of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone on human faecal flora. A double-blind study.
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:6-11. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00004.

本文引用的文献

1
Inhibition of Clostridium difficile by faecal streptococci.粪链球菌对艰难梭菌的抑制作用。
J Med Microbiol. 1982 Nov;15(4):569-74. doi: 10.1099/00222615-15-4-569.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验