• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单剂量头孢噻肟或头孢曲松对人体粪便菌群的影响。一项双盲研究。

Effect of a single dose of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone on human faecal flora. A double-blind study.

作者信息

Michéa-Hamzehpour M, Auckenthaler R, Kunz J, Pechère J C

机构信息

Département de Microbiologie, Centre Médical Universitaire, Genève.

出版信息

Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:6-11. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00004.

DOI:10.2165/00003495-198800352-00004
PMID:3396490
Abstract

The effect of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone on faecal flora was investigated in women undergoing routine vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy. Three groups of 9 patients received, in a double-blind fashion and just before surgery, cefotaxime 2g intravenously, ceftriaxone 2g intravenously or no antibiotic (controls). Stools were collected before prophylaxis (sample 1) and after surgery (samples 2 and 3). The only alteration after cefotaxime was a decrease of non-fastidious aerobic Gram-negative flora in sample 2. The same effect was more pronounced after ceftriaxone (p less than 0.01) which, in addition, increased yeast colonies (p less than 0.05) in sample 2. In sample 3, more resistant (MIC greater than 32 mg/L) aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were found after ceftriaxone (log10 median 7.5 and 9.0, respectively) than after cefotaxime (4.2 and 6.0) or in controls (4.4 and 6.6) [p less than 0.01 in each case]. Group D streptococci and Gram-positive cocci remained unchanged in the 3 groups. Clostridium difficile cytotoxin assays were negative. The effects on faecal flora were more pronounced after ceftriaxone.

摘要

在接受常规阴道或腹部子宫切除术的女性中,研究了头孢噻肟和头孢曲松对粪便菌群的影响。三组患者,每组9例,采用双盲法,在手术前静脉注射2g头孢噻肟、2g头孢曲松或不使用抗生素(对照组)。在预防性用药前(样本1)和手术后(样本2和3)采集粪便。使用头孢噻肟后唯一的变化是样本2中兼性需氧革兰氏阴性菌群减少。使用头孢曲松后同样的效果更明显(p<0.01),此外,样本2中的酵母菌落增加(p<0.05)。在样本3中,使用头孢曲松后发现的耐药性更强(最低抑菌浓度大于32mg/L)的需氧菌和厌氧菌(对数中位数分别为7.5和9.0)比使用头孢噻肟后(4.2和6.0)或对照组(4.4和6.6)更多[每种情况p<0.01]。三组中的D组链球菌和革兰氏阳性球菌保持不变。艰难梭菌细胞毒素检测为阴性。头孢曲松对粪便菌群的影响更明显。

相似文献

1
Effect of a single dose of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone on human faecal flora. A double-blind study.单剂量头孢噻肟或头孢曲松对人体粪便菌群的影响。一项双盲研究。
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:6-11. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00004.
2
Impact of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone on the bowel and vaginal flora after single-dose prophylaxis in vaginal hysterectomy.
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:163-8. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00035.
3
Influence of third-generation cephalosporins on aerobic intestinal flora.第三代头孢菌素对肠道需氧菌群的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:67-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.67.
4
The influence of third-generation cephalosporins on the aerobic intestinal flora.第三代头孢菌素对肠道需氧菌群的影响。
Infection. 1985;13 Suppl 1:S137-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01644235.
5
The effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract with the addition of systemic cefotaxime on the aerobic faecal flora of mice.添加全身性头孢噻肟对小鼠需氧粪便菌群进行消化道选择性去污的效果。
Epidemiol Infect. 1987 Jun;98(3):385-95. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800062154.
6
The effect of a single intravenous dose of cefotaxime on the faecal flora.单次静脉注射头孢噻肟对粪便菌群的影响。
Infection. 1985;13 Suppl 1:S134-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01644234.
7
Effects of imipenem, cefotaxime and cotrimoxazole on aerobic microbial colonization of the digestive tract.亚胺培南、头孢噻肟和复方新诺明对消化道需氧微生物定植的影响。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1993;25(4):473-8. doi: 10.3109/00365549309008529.
8
Influence of cephalosporines III generation with varying biliary excretion on fecal flora and emergence of resistant bacteria during and after cessation of therapy.不同胆汁排泄率的第三代头孢菌素对治疗期间及停药后粪便菌群及耐药菌出现的影响。
Padiatr Padol. 1986;21(4):335-42.
9
Ceftriaxone. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.头孢曲松。对其抗菌活性、药理特性及治疗用途的综述。
Drugs. 1984 Jun;27(6):469-527. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198427060-00001.
10
Effect of intramuscular ceftriaxone on aerobic oral and faecal flora of 11 healthy volunteers.肌肉注射头孢曲松对11名健康志愿者口腔和粪便需氧菌群的影响。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1991;23(5):625-33. doi: 10.3109/00365549109105188.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotics in anesthesia and critical care.麻醉与重症监护中的抗生素
Ann Transl Med. 2024 Feb 1;12(1):6. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5585. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
Clinical outcome of wild-type AmpC-producing Enterobacterales infection in critically ill patients treated with β-lactams: a prospective multicenter study.β-内酰胺类药物治疗重症患者产野生型AmpC肠杆菌科细菌感染的临床结局:一项前瞻性多中心研究
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Nov 17;12(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01079-5.
3
Modeling the bacterial dynamics in the gut microbiota following an antibiotic-induced perturbation.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of cefoperazone therapy on fecal flora.头孢哌酮治疗对粪便菌群的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Aug;22(2):226-30. doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.2.226.
2
Effect of cefoperazone on faecal flora.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Aug;12(2):163-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.2.163.
3
Impact of antimicrobial agents on the gastrointestinal microflora and the risk of infections.抗菌药物对胃肠道微生物群的影响及感染风险
Am J Med. 1984 May 15;76(5A):99-106. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90250-x.
模拟抗生素诱导扰动后肠道微生物群中的细菌动态。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;11(7):906-918. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12806. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
Ceftriaxone and Cefotaxime Have Similar Effects on the Intestinal Microbiota in Human Volunteers Treated by Standard-Dose Regimens.头孢曲松和头孢噻肟在标准剂量方案治疗的人类志愿者中的肠道微生物群中具有相似的作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 May 24;63(6). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02244-18. Print 2019 Jun.
5
Causes, consequences, and perspectives in the variations of intestinal density of colonization of multidrug-resistant enterobacteria.多药耐药肠杆菌定植肠道密度变化的原因、后果和展望。
Front Microbiol. 2013 May 28;4:129. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00129. eCollection 2013.
6
Imipenem or cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with vancomycin for therapy of presumed or proven infection in neutropenic cancer patients.亚胺培南或头孢哌酮-舒巴坦联合万古霉素用于治疗中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者的疑似或确诊感染。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Aug;15(8):625-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01691147.
7
Prospective evaluation of effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics on gastrointestinal yeast colonization of humans.广谱抗生素对人类胃肠道酵母菌定植影响的前瞻性评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jan;37(1):51-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.1.51.
8
Bacterial resistance: new threats, new challenges.细菌耐药性:新威胁,新挑战。
Support Care Cancer. 1993 May;1(3):124-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00366057.
9
In vitro stepwise selection of resistance to quinolones, beta-lactams and amikacin in nosocomial gram-negative bacilli.
Infection. 1994;22 Suppl 2:S105-10. doi: 10.1007/BF01793574.
10
Randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacies, costs, and vaginal flora alterations with single-dose ceftriaxone and multidose cefazolin prophylaxis in vaginal hysterectomy.单剂量头孢曲松与多剂量头孢唑林预防阴道子宫切除术中疗效、成本及阴道菌群改变的随机双盲比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jun;34(6):1194-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.6.1194.
4
Effect of broad-spectrum cephalosporins on the microbial flora of recipients.
J Infect Dis. 1983 Nov;148(5):892-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/148.5.892.
5
Ceftriaxone: renal and biliary excretion and effect on the colon microflora.头孢曲松:肾脏和胆汁排泄及对结肠微生物群的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Sep;10(3):207-15. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.3.207.
6
Cefotaxime in children: efficacy, tolerance and effect on the intestinal bacterial flora.儿童使用头孢噻肟:疗效、耐受性及对肠道菌群的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980 Sep;6 Suppl A:235-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/6.suppl_a.235.
7
Influence of third-generation cephalosporins on aerobic intestinal flora.第三代头孢菌素对肠道需氧菌群的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Sep;14 Suppl B:67-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_b.67.
8
Metabolism of cefotaxime: a review.头孢噻肟的代谢:综述
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Jun;2(3 Suppl):3S-12S.
9
Effect of moxalactam on human fecal microflora.羟羧氧酰胺菌素对人体粪便微生物区系的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jan;29(1):175-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.1.175.
10
Bowel flora changes in humans receiving cefixime (CL 284,635) or cefaclor.接受头孢克肟(CL 284,635)或头孢克洛治疗的人类肠道菌群变化。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Mar;31(3):443-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.3.443.