• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肛门成形术治疗解剖性肛门狭窄:并发症和复发的系统评价。

Anoplasty for anatomical anal stenosis: systematic review of complications and recurrences.

机构信息

Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Surgical Unit 'M. Rubino', Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University 'Aldo Moro of Bari', Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2022 Dec;24(12):1462-1471. doi: 10.1111/codi.16248. Epub 2022 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1111/codi.16248
PMID:35792887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10086798/
Abstract

AIM

The optimal surgical treatment for anatomical anal stenosis (AS) remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to determine the rates of complications and recurrence after anoplasty for anatomical AS and, wherever feasible, compare the outcomes for the various techniques.

METHOD

A PROSPERO-registered systematic review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library of Systematic Review, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to May 2021. Studies that assessed the outcomes of anoplasty in adult patients with anatomical AS were selected. The primary outcomes were complications and recurrence. The methodological quality of studies was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

From the total of 2705 unique screened records, 151 were assessed for eligibility. Only 29 studies (two prospective) met the inclusion criteria, reporting data on 556 patients [mean age 53 (18-83) years, 46% female]. Previous history of surgery for haemorrhoidal disease accounted for three quarters of cases. A total of 14 types of anoplasty were found, with the Y-V flap being the most performed technique [27% of cases (n = 149)]. Complications frequently occurred, with a pooled prevalence of 10.2% (95% CI 3.9%-24.1%) after Y-V flap and 11.5% (5.3%-23.0%) after rhomboid/diamond flap. Patients undergoing house flap achieved better results in terms of clinical improvement, satisfaction and quality of life compared with Y-V flap and rhomboid/diamond flap. When considering only studies with at least 12 months of follow-up, the pooled prevalence of recurrence was 4.7% (2.2%-9.8%), with significantly higher rates observed in the prospective versus retrospective series [pooled prevalence 18.9% (11.5%-29.5%) vs. 3.6% (1.7-7.8%), respectively; p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Both complications and recurrence were significantly lower after house flap compared with rhomboid/diamond and Y-V flap. Better designed multicentre studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021239493.

摘要

目的

解剖性肛门狭窄(AS)的最佳手术治疗方法仍有待确定。本研究旨在确定肛门成形术治疗解剖性 AS 的并发症和复发率,并在可行的情况下比较各种技术的结果。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目的原则,对 PROSPERO 注册的系统评价进行了报告。检索了截至 2021 年 5 月发表的评估成人解剖性 AS 患者肛门成形术结果的文章,包括 Medline、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 系统评价图书馆、Scopus 和 Web of Science。选择评估成人解剖性 AS 患者肛门成形术结果的研究。主要结局是并发症和复发。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的批判性评估工具评估研究的方法学质量。

结果

在总共 2705 份筛选记录中,有 151 份符合入选标准,仅 29 项研究(两项前瞻性)符合纳入标准,报告了 556 例患者的数据[平均年龄 53(18-83)岁,46%为女性]。既往痔病手术史占病例的四分之三。共发现 14 种肛门成形术,其中 Y-V 皮瓣是最常进行的技术[27%(n=149)]。并发症发生率较高,Y-V 皮瓣的总发生率为 10.2%(95%CI 3.9%-24.1%),菱形/钻石皮瓣为 11.5%(5.3%-23.0%)。与 Y-V 皮瓣和菱形/钻石皮瓣相比,行房式皮瓣的患者在临床改善、满意度和生活质量方面的结果更好。当仅考虑随访至少 12 个月的研究时,复发的总发生率为 4.7%(2.2%-9.8%),前瞻性系列的发生率明显高于回顾性系列[总发生率分别为 18.9%(11.5%-29.5%)和 3.6%(1.7%-7.8%);p<0.001]。

结论

与菱形/钻石和 Y-V 皮瓣相比,房式皮瓣的并发症和复发率明显较低。需要更好设计、更长随访的多中心研究来证实这些发现。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021239493。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/0885fa140393/CODI-24-1462-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/d9d2bc8b66f3/CODI-24-1462-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/44e8a816030d/CODI-24-1462-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/9fb42c38c348/CODI-24-1462-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/0885fa140393/CODI-24-1462-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/d9d2bc8b66f3/CODI-24-1462-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/44e8a816030d/CODI-24-1462-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/9fb42c38c348/CODI-24-1462-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b3d/10086798/0885fa140393/CODI-24-1462-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Anoplasty for anatomical anal stenosis: systematic review of complications and recurrences.肛门成形术治疗解剖性肛门狭窄:并发症和复发的系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Dec;24(12):1462-1471. doi: 10.1111/codi.16248. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
2
Comparative study of the house advancement flap, rhomboid flap, and y-v anoplasty in treatment of anal stenosis: a prospective randomized study.肛门狭窄治疗中房式推进皮瓣、菱形皮瓣与 Y-V 成形术的对比研究:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 May;53(5):790-7. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d3205a.
3
Anoplasty for the treatment of anal stenosis.肛门成形术治疗肛门狭窄。
Am J Surg. 1998 Feb;175(2):158-60. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00266-3.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Surgical Treatment of Anal Stenosis with Diamond Flap Anoplasty Performed in a Calibrated Fashion.采用校准方式施行菱形皮瓣肛门成形术治疗肛门狭窄
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Mar;59(3):230-5. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000530.
6
House advancement flap anoplasty for severe post-hemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis.肛门后位严重狭窄的经肛门皮瓣推进术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Mar;24(3):261-262. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02139-y. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
7
New Techniques in Hemorrhoidal Disease but the Same Old Problem: Anal Stenosis.痔病新技术,但同样存在老问题:肛门狭窄。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 1;58(3):362. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030362.
8
Is anoplasty superior to scar revision surgery for post-hemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis? Six years of experience.肛门成形术在痔切除术后肛门狭窄治疗方面是否优于瘢痕修复手术?六年经验总结。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Aug 6;10(22):7698-7707. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7698.
9
Anal stenosis: use of an algorithm to provide a tension-free anoplasty.肛门狭窄:使用一种算法进行无张力肛门成形术。
ANZ J Surg. 2010 May;80(5):337-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05044.x.
10
Repair of anal stricture and mucosal ectropion with Y-V or pedicle flap anoplasty.采用Y-V或带蒂皮瓣肛门成形术修复肛门狭窄和黏膜外翻。
Am J Surg. 1993 Jul;166(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80583-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Sclerotherapy with 3% polidocanol foam for the treatment of mucocutaneous bridges and/or residual piles after open excisional hemorrhoidectomy.聚多卡醇泡沫硬化剂注射治疗痔切除术后黏膜桥和(或)残余痔赘
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):2087-2090. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01798-3. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Editorial: Advances in proctology and colorectal surgery.社论:直肠病学与结直肠外科的进展
Front Surg. 2023 Dec 11;10:1344739. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1344739. eCollection 2023.
3
Bilateral Transposition Flap for Postoperative Anal Stenosis after Reconstruction for Paget Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
A worldwide survey on proctological practice during COVID-19 lockdown (ProctoLock 2020): a cross-sectional analysis.一项关于 COVID-19 封锁期间直肠肛门病学实践的全球调查(ProctoLock 2020):一项横断面分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jan;23(1):246-264. doi: 10.1111/codi.15394. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
A tailored rhomboid mucocutaneous advancement flap to treat anal stenosis.
双侧转位皮瓣用于佩吉特病重建术后的肛门狭窄
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Aug 3;11(8):e5142. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005142. eCollection 2023 Aug.
一种用于治疗肛门狭窄的定制菱形黏膜皮肤推进皮瓣。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Oct;22(10):1388-1395. doi: 10.1111/codi.15118. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
House advancement flap anoplasty for severe post-haemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis - a video vignette.用于严重痔切除术后肛门狭窄的肛管前移皮瓣肛门成形术——视频病例
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22(9):1207-1208. doi: 10.1111/codi.15059. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
5
House advancement flap anoplasty for severe post-hemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis.肛门后位严重狭窄的经肛门皮瓣推进术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Mar;24(3):261-262. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02139-y. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study.影响日间手术患者选择椎管内麻醉或全身麻醉的因素:一项多中心观察性研究的结果。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):527-540. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01171-6. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
7
Bilateral Rotational S Flap Technique for Preventing Restenosis in Patients With Severe Circular Anal Stenosis: A Review of 2 Cases.双侧旋转S皮瓣技术预防重度环状肛门狭窄患者再狭窄:2例病例回顾
Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Aug 31;35(4):221-224. doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.10.16. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
8
Anoplasty for Post-hemorrhoidectomy Low Anal Stenosis: A New Technique.痔切除术后低位肛门狭窄的肛门成形术:一种新技术
World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):3015-3020. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4561-6.
9
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons.美国结直肠外科医师协会和美国胃肠与内镜外科医师协会发布的《结肠直肠手术后加速康复临床实践指南》
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Aug;60(8):761-784. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000883.
10
Treatment of Complete Anal Stricture after Diverting Colostomy for Fournier's Gangrene.福尼尔坏疽行转流性结肠造口术后完全性肛门狭窄的治疗
Case Rep Surg. 2017;2017:2062157. doi: 10.1155/2017/2062157. Epub 2017 Jan 31.