Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, 110434La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Qual Health Res. 2022 Aug;32(10):1419-1432. doi: 10.1177/10497323221110092. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
In this article, we analyse interview data on how alcohol policy stakeholders in Australia, Canada and Sweden understand the relationship between men, masculinities, alcohol and violence. Using influential feminist scholarship on public policy and liberal political theory to analyse interviews with 42 alcohol policy stakeholders, we argue that while these stakeholders view men's violence as a key issue for intervention, masculinities are backgrounded in proposed responses and men positioned as unamenable to intervention. Instead, policy stakeholders prioritise generic interventions understood to protect all from the harms of men's drinking and violence without marking men for special attention. Shared across the data is a prioritisation of interventions that focus on harms recognised as relating to men's drinking but apply equally to all people and, as such, avoid naming men and masculinities as central to alcohol-related violence. We argue that this process works to background the role of masculinities in violence, leaving men unmarked and many possible targeted responses unthinkable.
在本文中,我们分析了澳大利亚、加拿大和瑞典的酒精政策利益相关者如何理解男性、男子气概、酒精和暴力之间的关系。我们使用有影响力的关于公共政策和自由政治理论的女性主义学术理论,对 42 名酒精政策利益相关者进行了访谈,我们认为,尽管这些利益相关者认为男性的暴力行为是需要干预的关键问题,但在提出的应对措施中,男子气概被置于次要地位,而男性则被认为难以干预。相反,政策利益相关者优先考虑一般性干预措施,这些措施被理解为可以保护所有人免受男性饮酒和暴力的伤害,而不会特别关注男性。数据中共同存在的是,优先考虑那些关注被认为与男性饮酒有关的伤害的干预措施,但这些措施同样适用于所有人,因此避免将男性和男子气概视为与酒精相关暴力的核心。我们认为,这一过程使得男子气概在暴力中的作用被边缘化,使男性不受关注,许多可能的针对性应对措施也无法被考虑。