• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童阅读过程中的在线推理和理解监控:来自眼动的证据。

Online inference making and comprehension monitoring in children during reading: Evidence from eye movements.

机构信息

Institute of Education, University of Reading, Reading, UK.

Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jul;74(7):1202-1224. doi: 10.1177/1747021821999007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1177/1747021821999007
PMID:33586535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8189006/
Abstract

Inference generation and comprehension monitoring are essential elements of successful reading comprehension. While both improve with age and reading development, little is known about when and how children make inferences and monitor their comprehension during the reading process itself. Over two experiments, we monitored the eye movements of two groups of children (age 8-13 years) as they read short passages and answered questions that tapped local (Experiment 1) and global (Experiment 2) inferences. To tap comprehension monitoring, the passages contained target words which were consistent or inconsistent with the context. Comprehension question location was also manipulated with the question appearing before or after the passage. Children made local inferences during reading, but the evidence was less clear for global inferences. Children were sensitive to inconsistencies that relied on the generation of an inference, consistent with successful comprehension monitoring, although this was seen only very late in the eye movement record. Although question location had a large effect on reading times, it had no effect on global comprehension in one experiment and reading the question first had a detrimental effect in the other. We conclude that children appear to prioritise efficiency over completeness when reading, generating inferences spontaneously only when they are necessary for establishing a coherent representation of the text.

摘要

推理生成和理解监控是成功阅读理解的重要组成部分。虽然这两者都随着年龄和阅读能力的发展而提高,但对于儿童在阅读过程中何时以及如何进行推理和监控他们的理解,我们知之甚少。在两项实验中,我们监测了两组儿童(8-13 岁)在阅读短文并回答问题时的眼动,这些问题涉及局部(实验 1)和全局(实验 2)推理。为了挖掘理解监控,短文包含了与上下文一致或不一致的目标词。理解问题的位置也通过问题出现在短文之前或之后进行了操作。儿童在阅读过程中会进行局部推理,但对于全局推理,证据就不那么明显了。儿童对依赖推理生成的不一致性很敏感,这与成功的理解监控是一致的,尽管这只在眼动记录的很晚阶段才出现。虽然问题位置对阅读时间有很大影响,但在一个实验中对全局理解没有影响,而在另一个实验中先阅读问题则产生了不利影响。我们的结论是,儿童在阅读时似乎更注重效率而不是完整性,只有在为文本建立连贯的表示形式有必要时,才会自发地进行推理。

相似文献

1
Online inference making and comprehension monitoring in children during reading: Evidence from eye movements.儿童阅读过程中的在线推理和理解监控:来自眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jul;74(7):1202-1224. doi: 10.1177/1747021821999007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Assessment of inference-making in children using comprehension questions and story retelling: Effect of text modality and a story presentation format.使用理解性问题和故事复述对儿童推理能力的评估:文本模态和故事呈现形式的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):637-652. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12620.
3
Strategies of readers with autism when responding to inferential questions: An eye-movement study.自闭症读者回答推理问题时的策略:一项眼动研究。
Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):888-900. doi: 10.1002/aur.1731. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
Brief report: Autistic students read between lines.简要报告:自闭症学生能读懂字里行间的意思。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 May;54(5):2055-2059. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05648-2. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Does Online Comprehension Monitoring Make a Unique Contribution to Reading Comprehension in Beginning Readers? Evidence from Eye Movements.在线阅读理解监控对初学者的阅读理解有独特贡献吗?来自眼动的证据。
Sci Stud Read. 2018;22(5):367-383. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1457680. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
6
Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.儿童的阅读“足够好”吗?儿童阅读句法歧义句时在线加工与理解之间的联系。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(5):855-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
7
The effects of question previewing on response accuracy and text processing: An eye-movement study.问题预览对反应准确性和文本处理的影响:一项眼动研究。
J Sch Psychol. 2024 Jun;104:101313. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101313. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
8
Text integration processes in children with Childhood Epilepsy with Centro-Temporal Spikes.伴有中央颞区棘波的儿童癫痫患者的文本整合过程
Epilepsy Res. 2023 May;192:107136. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107136. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
9
Assessing school-aged children's inference-making: the effect of story test format in listening comprehension.评估学龄儿童的推理能力:故事测试形式对听力理解的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jan;52(1):95-105. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12260. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
Understanding mechanisms in transitive inferences: an eye-tracking study in Korean reading.理解传递推理中的机制:一项关于韩语阅读的眼动研究。
Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Dec;117(3):761-74. doi: 10.2466/22.24.PMS.117x28z1.

引用本文的文献

1
EMTeC: A corpus of eye movements on machine-generated texts.EMTeC:机器生成文本上的眼动语料库。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 3;57(7):189. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02677-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert.终结阅读之争:新手到专家的阅读习得。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Jun;19(1):5-51. doi: 10.1177/1529100618772271.
3
The repeated name penalty effect in children's natural reading: Evidence from eye tracking.儿童自然阅读中的重复姓名惩罚效应:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):403-412. doi: 10.1177/1747021818757712. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
4
False Positives and Other Statistical Errors in Standard Analyses of Eye Movements in Reading.阅读中眼动标准分析中的假阳性及其他统计误差。
J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:119-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
Individual differences in fifth graders' reading and language predict their comprehension monitoring development: An eye-movement study.五年级学生阅读与语言方面的个体差异可预测其阅读理解监控能力的发展:一项眼动研究。
Sci Stud Read. 2015;19(2):114-134. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.943905.
6
Working memory, reading ability and the effects of distance and typicality on anaphor resolution in children.工作记忆、阅读能力以及距离和典型性对儿童指代消解的影响。
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2015 Jul 4;27(5):622-639. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2015.1005095.
7
Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension.低工作记忆容量与阅读理解能力差只是虚假相关。
Cognition. 2014 Jun;131(3):373-403. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
8
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
9
Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill.使用E-Z Reader来研究眼动控制与阅读技能的同步发展。
Dev Rev. 2013 Jun;33(2):110-149. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.03.001.
10
Children's and adults' on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences during reading.儿童和成人在阅读中对句法歧义句的在线处理。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054141. Epub 2013 Jan 17.