• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧肝胆管结石外科治疗的长期疗效:单中心 60 年真实世界经验

Long-term outcomes of surgical approaches for bilateral hepatolithiasis: A real-world six-decade experience at a single center.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Sep;29(9):994-1003. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1204. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.1204
PMID:35794790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bilateral hepatolithiasis is an intractable disease and repeated attacks of acute cholangitis seriously threaten patient health. The surgical approaches evolve along with gradually greater understanding of its pathophysiology.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study for bilateral hepatolithiasis from January 1958 to December 2018. Before May 1993 (Group A, n = 70), three surgical approaches were adopted: 37 patients with common bile duct exploration (CBDE), 29 with choledochoenterostomy (CE) and four with partial hepatectomy (PH). After June 1993 (Group B, n = 150), 101 patients underwent Oddi sphincter-preserved cholangioplasty with hepatico-subcutaneous stoma (OSPCHS), and 16 with CBDE, 21 with CE, 12 with PH. The perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

After 1993, the cholangitis recurrence rate significantly decreased from 49.2% to 20.9%, and the stone recurrence rate from 76.3% to 37.1% (both P < .001). Also, the stone-/cholangitis-free durations were prolonged significantly (median: 50.8 vs 26.4/49.6 vs 16.2 months, both P < .001). Preoperative cholangitis was an independent risk factor for stone recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.863, P = .018), and residual stone for cholangitis recurrence (HR = 2.838, P < .001). OSPCHS and PH were protective surgical approaches for recurrent stone (CBDE: reference; OSPCHS: HR = .469, P = .016, PH: HR = .219, P = .018) and cholangitis (CBDE: reference; OSPCHS: HR = .421, P = .010, PH: HR = .283, P = .093).

CONCLUSIONS

For bilateral hepatolithiasis, the management should focus on hepatobiliary lesion eradication and Oddi sphincter function preservation.

摘要

背景

双侧肝胆管结石是一种难治性疾病,反复发作的急性胆管炎严重威胁患者健康。手术方式的演变是随着对其病理生理学认识的不断深入而发展的。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1958 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间的双侧肝胆管结石患者。1993 年 5 月 1 日前(A 组,n=70),采用了三种手术方式:37 例行胆总管探查术(CBDE),29 例行胆肠吻合术(CE),4 例行部分肝切除术(PH)。1993 年 6 月后(B 组,n=150),101 例行Oddi 括约肌保留的胆管成形术联合肝皮下造口术(OSPCHS),16 例行 CBDE,21 例行 CE,12 例行 PH。比较两组患者的围手术期和长期疗效。

结果

1993 年后,胆管炎复发率从 49.2%显著降至 20.9%,结石复发率从 76.3%显著降至 37.1%(均 P < .001)。同时,结石/胆管炎无复发时间显著延长(中位数:50.8 个月比 26.4/49.6 个月比 16.2 个月,均 P < .001)。术前胆管炎是结石复发的独立危险因素(风险比[HR] 1.863,P=0.018),残余结石是胆管炎复发的独立危险因素(HR 2.838,P < .001)。OSPCHS 和 PH 是预防结石复发的保护因素(CBDE 为参照;OSPCHS:HR 0.469,P=0.016,PH:HR 0.219,P=0.018)和胆管炎复发的保护因素(CBDE 为参照;OSPCHS:HR 0.421,P=0.010,PH:HR 0.283,P=0.093)。

结论

对于双侧肝胆管结石,治疗重点应放在肝胆管病变的根治和Oddi 括约肌功能的保留上。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of surgical approaches for bilateral hepatolithiasis: A real-world six-decade experience at a single center.双侧肝胆管结石外科治疗的长期疗效:单中心 60 年真实世界经验
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Sep;29(9):994-1003. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1204. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
2
Oddi sphincter preserved cholangioplasty with hepatico-subcutaneous stoma for hepatolithiasis.保留Oddi括约肌的胆管成形术联合肝皮下造口术治疗肝内胆管结石
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 7;21(45):12865-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12865.
3
Laparoscopic hepaticoplasty using gallbladder as a subcutaneous tunnel for hepatolithiasis.利用胆囊作为皮下隧道的腹腔镜肝成形术治疗肝内胆管结石
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 28;20(12):3350-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3350.
4
Intrahepatic bile duct exploration lithotomy is a useful adjunctive hepatectomy method for bilateral primary hepatolithiasis: an eight-year experience at a single centre.肝内胆管探查取石术是一种用于双侧原发性肝内胆管结石的有用的辅助性肝切除术方法:单中心八年经验。
BMC Surg. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0480-1.
5
Evaluation of long-term results and recurrent factors after operative and nonoperative treatment for hepatolithiasis.肝内胆管结石手术及非手术治疗后的长期疗效及复发因素评估
Surgery. 2009 Nov;146(5):843-53. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 28.
6
Liver resection for hepatolithiasis: A multicenter experience in Latin America.肝内胆管结石的肝切除术:拉丁美洲的多中心经验
Surgery. 2023 Feb;173(2):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.10.024. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
7
Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: a critical appraisal.肝内胆管结石的肝管空肠吻合术:批判性评估
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul 14;12(26):4170-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170.
8
Hepatectomy with primary closure of common bile duct for hepatolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.肝切除术联合胆总管一期缝合治疗肝内胆管结石合并胆总管结石
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3564-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3564.
9
T-tube drainage versus choledochojejunostomy in hepatolithiasis patients with sphincter of Oddi laxity: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.T 型管引流与胆肠吻合术治疗Oddi 括约肌松弛的胆石病患者:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04483-z.
10
Is Oddi sphincterotomy an indication for hepatolithiasis?Oddi 括约肌切开术是否适用于肝胆管结石?
Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2268-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0304-3. Epub 2009 Jan 28.