• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用预测编码模型模拟儿童绘画行为的发展和个体差异

Simulating Developmental and Individual Differences of Drawing Behavior in Children Using a Predictive Coding Model.

作者信息

Philippsen Anja, Tsuji Sho, Nagai Yukie

机构信息

International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Institute for AI and Beyond, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Front Neurorobot. 2022 Jun 20;16:856184. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.856184. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnbot.2022.856184
PMID:35795004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9251405/
Abstract

Predictive coding has recently been proposed as a mechanistic approach to explain human perception and behavior based on the integration of perceptual stimuli (bottom-up information) and the predictions about the world based on previous experience (top-down information). However, the gap between the computational accounts of cognition and evidence of behavioral studies remains large. In this study, we used a computational model of drawing based on the mechanisms of predictive coding to systematically investigate the effects of the precision of top-down and bottom-up information when performing a drawing completion task. The results indicated that sufficient precision of both signals was required for the successful completion of the stimuli and that a reduced precision in either sensory or prediction (i.e., prior) information led to different types of atypical drawing behavior. We compared the drawings produced by our model to a dataset of drawings created by children aged between 2 and 8 years old who drew on incomplete drawings. This comparison revealed that a gradual increase in children's precision of top-down and bottom-up information as they develop effectively explains the observed change of drawing style from scribbling toward representational drawing. Furthermore, individual differences that are prevalent in children's drawings, might arise from different developmental pathways regarding the precision of these two signals. Based on these findings we propose a theory of how both general and individual development of drawing could be explained in a unified manner within the framework of predictive coding.

摘要

预测编码最近被提出作为一种机制方法,用于基于感知刺激(自下而上的信息)与基于先前经验对世界的预测(自上而下的信息)的整合来解释人类的感知和行为。然而,认知的计算模型与行为研究证据之间的差距仍然很大。在本研究中,我们使用了一个基于预测编码机制的绘画计算模型,系统地研究在执行绘画完成任务时自上而下和自下而上信息的精度的影响。结果表明,成功完成刺激需要两种信号都具有足够的精度,并且感觉或预测(即先验)信息中任何一种精度的降低都会导致不同类型的非典型绘画行为。我们将模型生成的绘画与2至8岁儿童在不完整绘画上进行创作的绘画数据集进行了比较。这种比较表明,随着儿童的成长,他们自上而下和自下而上信息的精度逐渐提高,这有效地解释了观察到的绘画风格从涂鸦向具象绘画的变化。此外,儿童绘画中普遍存在的个体差异可能源于这两种信号精度的不同发展路径。基于这些发现,我们提出了一种理论,即在预测编码框架内如何以统一的方式解释绘画的一般发展和个体发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/7f59cf7dc7d9/fnbot-16-856184-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/469a09b8c25b/fnbot-16-856184-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/5926761df06e/fnbot-16-856184-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/498f07f71692/fnbot-16-856184-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/bf7cc558638c/fnbot-16-856184-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/1a0216624b48/fnbot-16-856184-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/793d9491134b/fnbot-16-856184-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/d46ee978ebb9/fnbot-16-856184-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/e1d8bedc7e6c/fnbot-16-856184-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/ab55323e668e/fnbot-16-856184-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/2512f012c42b/fnbot-16-856184-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/7f59cf7dc7d9/fnbot-16-856184-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/469a09b8c25b/fnbot-16-856184-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/5926761df06e/fnbot-16-856184-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/498f07f71692/fnbot-16-856184-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/bf7cc558638c/fnbot-16-856184-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/1a0216624b48/fnbot-16-856184-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/793d9491134b/fnbot-16-856184-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/d46ee978ebb9/fnbot-16-856184-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/e1d8bedc7e6c/fnbot-16-856184-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/ab55323e668e/fnbot-16-856184-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/2512f012c42b/fnbot-16-856184-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf9/9251405/7f59cf7dc7d9/fnbot-16-856184-g0011.jpg

相似文献

1
Simulating Developmental and Individual Differences of Drawing Behavior in Children Using a Predictive Coding Model.使用预测编码模型模拟儿童绘画行为的发展和个体差异
Front Neurorobot. 2022 Jun 20;16:856184. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.856184. eCollection 2022.
2
Quantifying developmental and individual differences in spontaneous drawing completion among children.量化儿童自发绘画完成过程中的发育差异和个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 11;13:783446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783446. eCollection 2022.
3
Autistic traits are associated with atypical precision-weighted integration of top-down and bottom-up neural signals.自闭症特征与自上而下和自下而上神经信号的非典型精确加权整合有关。
Cognition. 2020 Jun;199:104236. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104236. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
Deficits in Prediction Ability Trigger Asymmetries in Behavior and Internal Representation.预测能力的缺陷引发行为和内部表征的不对称。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 20;11:564415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.564415. eCollection 2020.
5
Reconsidering the scribbling stage of drawing: a new perspective on toddlers' representational processes.重新审视绘画涂鸦阶段:对幼儿表征过程的新视角
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 21;6:1227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01227. eCollection 2015.
6
Rigidity in children's drawings and its relation with representational change.儿童绘画中的刻板性及其与表征变化的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2003 Oct;86(2):124-52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0965(03)00109-7.
7
Developmental Changes in Early Comprehension and Production of Drawings: Evidence From Two Socioeconomic Backgrounds.早期绘画理解与创作中的发展变化:来自两种社会经济背景的证据。
J Genet Psychol. 2017 Jul-Aug;178(4):217-228. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2017.1328385. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
8
Human figure drawings by schooled and unschooled children in Papua New Guinea.巴布亚新几内亚受过教育和未受过教育的儿童所画的人物画。
Child Dev. 1996 Dec;67(6):2743-62.
9
Children aged two to four are able to scribble and draw using a smartphone app.两到四岁的儿童能够使用智能手机应用程序涂鸦和画画。
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Jun;106(6):991-994. doi: 10.1111/apa.13818. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
10
Drawing across media: A cross-sectional experiment on preschoolers' drawings produced using traditional versus electronic mediums.跨媒体绘画:一项关于使用传统和电子媒介创作的学龄前儿童绘画的横断面实验。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Jan;56(1):28-39. doi: 10.1037/dev0000825. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring cognitive individuality and the underlying creativity in statistical learning and phase entrainment.探索统计学习和相位同步中的认知个体性及潜在创造力。
EXCLI J. 2023 Aug 4;22:828-846. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6135. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying developmental and individual differences in spontaneous drawing completion among children.量化儿童自发绘画完成过程中的发育差异和个体差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 11;13:783446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783446. eCollection 2022.
2
No increased circular inference in adults with high levels of autistic traits or autism.高自闭症特质或自闭症成人中不存在环形推理增加。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 24;17(9):e1009006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009006. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Predictive Processing in Cognitive Robotics: A Review.
认知机器人中的预测处理:综述。
Neural Comput. 2021 Apr 13;33(5):1402-1432. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01383.
4
Deficits in Prediction Ability Trigger Asymmetries in Behavior and Internal Representation.预测能力的缺陷引发行为和内部表征的不对称。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 20;11:564415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.564415. eCollection 2020.
5
A review on neural network models of schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder.精神分裂症和自闭症谱系障碍的神经网络模型研究综述。
Neural Netw. 2020 Feb;122:338-363. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Nine-month-old infants update their predictive models of a changing environment.9 个月大的婴儿会更新他们对不断变化的环境的预测模型。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Aug;38:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100680. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
7
Predictive learning: its key role in early cognitive development.预测学习:其在早期认知发展中的关键作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 29;374(1771):20180030. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0030.
8
A Neurorobotics Simulation of Autistic Behavior Induced by Unusual Sensory Precision.由异常感官精度诱发的自闭症行为的神经机器人模拟
Comput Psychiatr. 2018 Dec;2:164-182. doi: 10.1162/cpsy_a_00019.
9
Prediction in infants and adults: A pupillometry study.婴儿和成人的预测:瞳孔测量研究。
Dev Sci. 2019 Jul;22(4):e12780. doi: 10.1111/desc.12780. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis.精神病的预测编码理论。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;84(9):634-643. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 25.