Shackford S R, Mackersie R C, Hoyt D B, Baxt W G, Eastman A B, Hammill F N, Knotts F B, Virgilio R W
Arch Surg. 1987 May;122(5):523-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400170029003.
We examined the impact of a trauma system on the survival of patients with a Trauma Score of 8 or less. We compared the observed survival with that predicted using a method that calculates the probability of survival (Ps) based on age, physiologic score, and anatomic severity of injury. Of 3394 patients triaged to trauma centers in a 12-month period, 283 (8.3%) had a Trauma Score of 8 or less. Sufficient data were available in 189 patients with blunt trauma to make the survival comparison. The Ps was 18%; the observed survival was 29%. Of 60 patients with penetrating trauma and complete data, the Ps was 8%; the observed survival was 20%. We attribute the improved survival to the integration of prehospital and hospital care and expeditious surgery.
我们研究了创伤系统对创伤评分在8分及以下患者生存率的影响。我们将观察到的生存率与使用基于年龄、生理评分和损伤解剖严重程度计算生存概率(Ps)的方法所预测的生存率进行了比较。在12个月内被分诊到创伤中心的3394例患者中,283例(8.3%)创伤评分为8分及以下。189例钝性创伤患者有足够的数据进行生存比较。生存概率为18%;观察到的生存率为29%。在60例有完整数据的穿透性创伤患者中,生存概率为8%;观察到的生存率为20%。我们将生存率的提高归因于院前和院内护理的整合以及快速手术。