Suppr超能文献

医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险按服务收费计划中老年患者的糖尿病管理:糖尿病协作登记处。

Diabetes Care Among Older Adults Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Medicare Fee-For-Service Plans: The Diabetes Collaborative Registry.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2022 Jul 7;45(7):1549-1557. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1178.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Medicare Advantage (MA), Medicare's managed care program, is quickly expanding, yet little is known about diabetes care quality delivered under MA compared with traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years old enrolled in the Diabetes Collaborative Registry from 2014 to 2019 with type 2 diabetes treated with one or more antihyperglycemic therapies. Quality measures, cardiometabolic risk factor control, and antihyperglycemic prescription patterns were compared between Medicare plan groups, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Among 345,911 Medicare beneficiaries, 229,598 (66%) were enrolled in FFS and 116,313 (34%) in MA plans (for ≥1 month). MA beneficiaries were more likely to receive ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers for coronary artery disease, tobacco cessation counseling, and screening for retinopathy, foot care, and kidney disease (adjusted P ≤ 0.001 for all). MA beneficiaries had modestly but significantly higher systolic blood pressure (+0.2 mmHg), LDL cholesterol (+2.6 mg/dL), and HbA1c (+0.1%) (adjusted P < 0.01 for all). MA beneficiaries were independently less likely to receive glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (6.9% vs. 9.0%; adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.77-0.84) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (5.4% vs. 6.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95). When integrating Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked data from 2014 to 2017 and more recent unlinked data from the Diabetes Collaborative Registry through 2019 (total N = 411,465), these therapeutic differences persisted, including among subgroups with established cardiovascular and kidney disease.

CONCLUSIONS

While MA plans enable greater access to preventive care, this may not translate to improved intermediate health outcomes. MA beneficiaries are also less likely to receive newer antihyperglycemic therapies with proven outcome benefits in high-risk individuals. Long-term health outcomes under various Medicare plans requires surveillance.

摘要

目的

医疗保险优势计划(MA)是医疗保险的管理式医疗计划,正在迅速扩张,但与传统的按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险相比,人们对 MA 下提供的糖尿病护理质量知之甚少。

研究设计和方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2014 年至 2019 年期间参加糖尿病协作登记处的年龄≥65 岁的医疗保险受益人的数据,这些患者患有 2 型糖尿病,接受一种或多种抗高血糖治疗。在调整了社会人口统计学和临床因素后,比较了医疗保险计划组之间的质量指标、心血管代谢风险因素控制和抗高血糖处方模式。

结果

在 345911 名医疗保险受益人中,229598 人(66%)参加了 FFS,116313 人(34%)参加了 MA 计划(至少参加了 1 个月)。与 FFS 计划相比,MA 计划的患者更有可能接受 ACE 抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗冠心病、戒烟咨询、视网膜病变筛查、足部护理和肾脏疾病筛查(所有调整后的 P 值均≤0.001)。MA 计划的患者收缩压(+0.2mmHg)、LDL 胆固醇(+2.6mg/dL)和 HbA1c(+0.1%)略有但显著升高(所有调整后的 P 值均<0.01)。MA 计划的患者接受胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(6.9% vs. 9.0%;调整后的比值比 0.80,95%CI 0.77-0.84)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(5.4% vs. 6.7%;调整后的比值比 0.91,95%CI 0.87-0.95)的可能性显著降低。当将 2014 年至 2017 年的医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心相关数据与 2019 年通过糖尿病协作登记处获得的最新非相关数据(总计 411465 人)整合在一起时,这些治疗差异仍然存在,包括在有明确心血管和肾脏疾病的亚组中。

结论

虽然 MA 计划可以更方便地获得预防保健,但这可能并不能转化为改善中间健康结果。MA 计划的患者也不太可能接受新的抗高血糖疗法,这些疗法在高危人群中具有良好的疗效。各种医疗保险计划下的长期健康结果需要进行监测。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Care of Diabetes and the Sacrifice of Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Equity.糖尿病护理与循证医学和健康公平的牺牲。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(12):2333-2337. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08907-3. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

10
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S98-S110. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S009.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验