Integrative Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Oct;122(10):2189-2200. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-04992-6. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) have a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease and low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). CRF is an important predictor of survival in BCS. However, the physiological factors that contribute to low CRF in BCS have not been completely elucidated. To assess differences in physiological factors (cardiac, pulmonary, muscle function) related to CRF between BCS and controls. Twenty-three BCS and 23 age-body mass index (BMI) matched controls underwent a peak cycling exercise test to determine CRF, with physiological factors measured at resting and at peak exercise. Cardiac hemodynamics (stroke volume [SV], SVindex, heart rate [HR], cardiac output [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]index) were evaluated using ultrasonography. Pulmonary function was evaluated using the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), ventilation to carbon dioxide production slope [Formula: see text] and breathing reserve at peak exercise (BR). Muscle oxygenation variables (oxygenated [HbO] deoxygenated [HHb] and total hemoglobin [Hb], and tissue oxygenation index [TSI]) were measured with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Both groups had similar CRF and similarly increased all hemodynamic variables (HR, SV, SVindex, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]index) at peak exercise compared to resting (p < 0.001). BCS had higher overall HR and lower SVindex (group effect, p < 0.05). BCS had similar OUES, [Formula: see text] and BR compared to the controls. Both groups decreased TSI, and increased Hb and HHb similarly at peak exercise compared to resting (p < 0.001). Our data suggest BCS do not exhibit differences in cardiac, pulmonary, or muscle function at peak exercise compared to controls, when both groups have similar CRF and physical activity.
乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)心血管疾病患病率高,心肺功能(CRF)较低。CRF 是 BCS 患者生存的重要预测因素。然而,导致 BCS 患者 CRF 降低的生理因素尚未完全阐明。评估 BCS 和对照组之间与 CRF 相关的生理因素(心脏、肺部、肌肉功能)的差异。23 名 BCS 和 23 名年龄-体重指数(BMI)匹配的对照组接受了峰值踏车运动测试以确定 CRF,并在静息和峰值运动时测量生理因素。使用超声心动图评估心脏血液动力学(每搏量 [SV]、SV 指数、心率 [HR]、心输出量 [Formula: see text]和 [Formula: see text]指数)。使用摄氧量效率斜率(OUES)评估肺功能,使用峰值运动时的通气二氧化碳产生斜率 [Formula: see text]和呼吸储备(BR)。使用近红外光谱(NIRS)测量肌肉氧合变量(含氧 [HbO]、去氧 [HHb]和总血红蛋白 [Hb]以及组织氧合指数 [TSI])。与静息相比,两组在峰值运动时均具有相似的 CRF,并同样增加了所有血液动力学变量(HR、SV、SV 指数、[Formula: see text]和 [Formula: see text]指数)(p<0.001)。BCS 的总 HR 较高,SV 指数较低(组间差异,p<0.05)。BCS 的 OUES、[Formula: see text]和 BR 与对照组相似。两组在峰值运动时 TSI 均降低,Hb 和 HHb 均较静息时增加(p<0.001)。我们的数据表明,与对照组相比,BCS 在峰值运动时的心脏、肺部或肌肉功能没有差异,当两组的 CRF 和身体活动相似时。