Le Minh-Phuong T, Voigt Lara, Nathanson Robert, Maw Anna M, Johnson Gordon, Dancel Ria, Mathews Benji, Moreira Alvaro, Sauthoff Harald, Gelabert Christopher, Kurian Linda M, Dumovich Jenna, Proud Kevin C, Solis-McCarthy Jessica, Candotti Carolina, Dayton Christopher, Arena Alexander, Boesch Brandon, Flores Saul, Foster Mark T, Villalobos Nicholas, Wong Tanping, Ortiz-Jaimes Gabriel, Mader Michael, Sisson Craig, Soni Nilam J
Division of General & Hospital Medicine, Joe R. and Terry Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7885, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Section of Hospital Medicine, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Ultrasound J. 2022 Jul 7;14(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13089-022-00274-6.
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is rapidly becoming ubiquitous across healthcare specialties. This is due to several factors including its portability, immediacy of results to guide clinical decision-making, and lack of radiation exposure to patients. The recent growth of handheld ultrasound devices has improved access to ultrasound for many clinicians. Few studies have directly compared different handheld ultrasound devices among themselves or to cart-based ultrasound machines. We conducted a prospective observational study comparing four common handheld ultrasound devices for ease of use, image quality, and overall satisfaction. Twenty-four POCUS experts utilized four handheld devices (Butterfly iQ+™ by Butterfly Network Inc., Kosmos™ by EchoNous, Vscan Air™ by General Electric, and Lumify™ by Philips Healthcare) to obtain three ultrasound views on the same standardized patients using high- and low-frequency probes.
Data were collected from 24 POCUS experts using all 4 handheld devices. No single ultrasound device was superior in all categories. For overall ease of use, the Vscan Air™ was rated highest, followed by the Lumify™. For overall image quality, Lumify™ was rated highest, followed by Kosmos™. The Lumify™ device was rated highest for overall satisfaction, while the Vscan Air™ was rated as the most likely to be purchased personally and carried in one's coat pocket. The top 5 characteristics of handheld ultrasound devices rated as being "very important" were image quality, ease of use, portability, total costs, and availability of different probes.
In a comparison of four common handheld ultrasound devices in the United States, no single handheld ultrasound device was perceived to have all desired characteristics. POCUS experts rated the Lumify™ highest for image quality and Vscan Air™ highest for ease of use. Overall satisfaction was highest with the Lumify™ device, while the most likely to be purchased as a pocket device was the Vscan Air™. Image quality was felt to be the most important characteristic in evaluating handheld ultrasound devices.
即时超声检查(POCUS)在各个医疗专业中迅速普及。这归因于几个因素,包括其便携性、能即时得出结果以指导临床决策,以及对患者无辐射暴露。近年来,手持式超声设备的发展使许多临床医生更容易使用超声检查。很少有研究直接比较不同的手持式超声设备,或将它们与台式超声机进行比较。我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,比较了四种常见的手持式超声设备在易用性、图像质量和总体满意度方面的表现。24名POCUS专家使用四种手持式设备(蝴蝶网络公司的Butterfly iQ+™、EchoNous公司的Kosmos™、通用电气公司的Vscan Air™和飞利浦医疗保健公司的Lumify™),通过高频和低频探头,对同一组标准化患者进行三种超声检查。
收集了24名POCUS专家使用所有4种手持式设备的数据。没有一种超声设备在所有类别中都表现出色。在总体易用性方面,Vscan Air™的评分最高,其次是Lumify™。在总体图像质量方面,Lumify™的评分最高,其次是Kosmos™。Lumify™设备在总体满意度方面的评分最高,而Vscan Air™被评为最有可能被个人购买并放在外套口袋里携带的设备。被评为“非常重要”的手持式超声设备的前5个特征是图像质量、易用性、便携性、总成本和不同探头的可用性。
在美国对四种常见手持式超声设备的比较中,没有一种手持式超声设备被认为具备所有理想的特征。POCUS专家对Lumify™的图像质量评分最高,对Vscan Air™的易用性评分最高。Lumify™设备的总体满意度最高,而最有可能作为口袋设备购买的是Vscan Air™。图像质量被认为是评估手持式超声设备时最重要的特征。