Suppr超能文献

即时超声专家对6款手持式超声设备的比较:一项横断面研究。

Comparison of 6 handheld ultrasound devices by point-of-care ultrasound experts: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Perez-Sanchez Ariadna, Johnson Gordon, Pucks Neysan, Soni Riya N, Lund Terry J S, Andrade Anthony J, Le Minh-Phuong T, Solis-McCarthy Jessica, Wong Tanping, Ashraf Arsal, Kumar Andre D, Banauch Gisela I, Verner James R, Sodhi Amik, Thomas Meghan K, LoPresti Charles, Schmitz Hannah, Koratala Abhilash, Hunninghake John, Manninen Erik, Candotti Carolina, Minami Taro, Mathews Benji K, Bandak Ghassan, Sauthoff Harald, Mayo-Malasky Henry, Cho Joel, Villalobos Nick, Proud Kevin C, Boesch Brandon, Fenton Portillo Federico, Reierson Kreegan, Malik Manpreet, Abbas Firas, Johnson Tim, Haro Elizabeth K, Mader Michael J, Mayo Paul, Franco-Sadud Ricardo, Soni Nilam J

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, Joe R. Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7885, San Antonio, Texas, 78229, USA.

Division of Hospital Medicine, Legacy Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Ultrasound J. 2024 Oct 2;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00392-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as an essential bedside tool for clinicians, but lack of access to ultrasound equipment has been a top barrier to POCUS use. Recently, several handheld ultrasound devices ("handhelds") have become available, and clinicians are seeking data to guide purchasing decisions. Few comparative studies of different handhelds have been done. We conducted a cross-sectional study comparing 6 handhelds readily available in the United States (Butterfly iQ +  by Butterfly Network Inc.; Clarius by Clarius Mobile Health; Kosmos by EchoNous; TE Air by Mindray; Vscan Air SL and CL by General Electric; and Lumify by Philips Healthcare). A multi-specialty group of physician POCUS experts (n = 35) acquired three standard ultrasound views (abdominal right upper quadrant, cardiac apical 4-chamber, and superficial neck and lung views) in random order on the same standardized patients and rated the image quality. Afterward, a final survey of the overall ease of use, image quality, and satisfaction of each handheld was completed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five POCUS experts specializing in internal medicine/hospital medicine, critical care, emergency medicine, and nephrology acquired and rated right upper quadrant, apical 4-chamber, and superficial neck and lung views with 6 different handhelds. For image quality, the highest-rated handhelds were Vscan Air for the right upper quadrant view, Mindray TE Air for the cardiac apical 4-chamber view, and Lumify for superficial views of the neck and lung. Overall satisfaction with image quality was highest with Vscan Air, Lumify, and Mindray, while overall satisfaction with ease of use was highest with Vscan Air. The 5 most desirable characteristics of handhelds were image quality, ease of use, portability, probe size, and battery life. Ultimately, all 6 handhelds had notable advantages and disadvantages, with no single device having all desired qualities or features.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall satisfaction with image quality was rated highest with Vscan Air, Lumify, and Mindray TE Airwhen acquiring right upper quadrant, apical 4-chamber, and superficial neck and lung views. No single handheld was perceived to be superior in image quality for all views. Vscan Air was rated highest for overall ease of use and was the most preferred handheld for purchase by POCUS experts.

摘要

背景

床旁超声(POCUS)已成为临床医生必不可少的床旁工具,但无法获取超声设备一直是POCUS使用的最大障碍。最近,几款手持式超声设备(“手持设备”)已上市,临床医生正在寻求数据以指导购买决策。针对不同手持设备的比较研究很少。我们进行了一项横断面研究,比较了美国市场上 readily available 的6款手持设备(蝴蝶网络公司的 Butterfly iQ +;Clarius Mobile Health公司的Clarius;EchoNous公司的Kosmos;迈瑞公司的TE Air;通用电气公司的Vscan Air SL和CL;以及飞利浦医疗保健公司的Lumify)。一个由POCUS专家组成的多专业小组(n = 35)在同一标准化患者身上随机获取三个标准超声视图(腹部右上象限、心脏心尖四腔心以及颈部和肺部浅表视图),并对图像质量进行评分。之后,完成了对每个手持设备整体易用性、图像质量和满意度的最终调查。

结果

35名专门从事内科/医院医学、重症监护、急诊医学和肾脏病学的POCUS专家使用6种不同的手持设备获取并评估了右上象限、心尖四腔心以及颈部和肺部浅表视图。在图像质量方面,右上象限视图评分最高的手持设备是Vscan Air,心脏心尖四腔心视图是迈瑞TE Air,颈部和肺部浅表视图是Lumify。对图像质量的总体满意度最高的是Vscan Air、Lumify和迈瑞,而对易用性的总体满意度最高的是Vscan Air。手持设备最理想的5个特性是图像质量、易用性、便携性、探头尺寸和电池续航时间。最终,所有6款手持设备都有显著的优缺点,没有一款设备具备所有期望的品质或功能。

结论

在获取右上象限、心尖四腔心以及颈部和肺部浅表视图时,对图像质量的总体满意度最高的是Vscan Air、Lumify和迈瑞TE Air。没有一款手持设备在所有视图的图像质量方面被认为是 superior 的。Vscan Air在整体易用性方面评分最高,是POCUS专家最倾向购买的手持设备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01fc/11447175/eeb8ab0070b4/13089_2024_392_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验