Suppr超能文献

阿普米司特在临床实践中的保留率:一项来自意大利多中心研究的观察结果。

Apremilast retention rate in clinical practice: observations from an Italian multi-center study.

机构信息

Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Rheumatology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Oct;41(10):3219-3225. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06255-3. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There are few real-world setting studies focused on apremilast effectiveness (i.e., retention rate) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The main aim of this retrospective observational study is the assessment of apremilast 3-year retention rate in real-world PsA patients. Moreover, the secondary objective is to report the reasons of apremilast discontinuation and the factors related to treatment persistence.

METHODS

In fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers, all PsA consecutive patients who received apremilast were enrolled. Anamnestic data, treatment history, and PsA disease activity (DAPSA) at baseline were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox analysis computed the apremilast retention rate and treatment persistence-related risk factors. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The 356 enrolled patients (median age 60 [interquartile range IQR 52-67] yrs; male prevalence 42.7%) median observation period was 17 [IQR 7-34] months (7218 patients-months). The apremilast retention rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 85.6%, 73.6%, and 61.8%. The main discontinuation reasons were secondary inefficacy (34% of interruptions), gastro-intestinal intolerance (24%), and primary inefficacy (19%). Age and oligo-articular phenotype were related to treatment persistence (respectively hazard ratio 0.98 IQR 0.96-0.99; p = 0.048 and 0.54 IQR 0.31-0.95; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Almost three-fifths of PsA patients receiving apremilast were still in treatment after 3 years. This study confirmed its effectiveness and safety profile. Apremilast appears as a good treatment choice in all oligo-articular PsA patients and in those ones burdened by relevant comorbidities. Key Points • Apremilast retention rates in this real-life cohort and trials are comparable. • The oligo-articular phenotype is associated with long-lasting treatment (i.e., 3 years). • No different or more prevalent adverse events were observed.

摘要

目的

针对银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者,目前仅有少数真实世界研究关注阿普米司特的疗效(即保留率)。本回顾性观察研究的主要目的是评估阿普米司特在真实世界中治疗 PsA 患者的 3 年保留率。此外,次要目标是报告阿普米司特停药的原因以及与治疗持续相关的因素。

方法

在意大利 15 个风湿病转诊中心,连续纳入接受阿普米司特治疗的所有 PsA 患者。记录患者的病史资料、治疗史以及基线时的银屑病关节炎疾病活动度(DAPSA)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 分析计算阿普米司特的保留率和治疗持续相关的危险因素。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

356 例入组患者(中位年龄 60 岁[四分位距 IQR 52-67]岁;男性占比 42.7%)的中位观察期为 17 个月[IQR 7-34](7218 患者-月)。阿普米司特在 12、24 和 36 个月的保留率分别为 85.6%、73.6%和 61.8%。主要停药原因为继发疗效不佳(34%的中断)、胃肠不耐受(24%)和原发疗效不佳(19%)。年龄和少关节炎表型与治疗持续相关(分别为风险比 0.98 IQR 0.96-0.99;p=0.048 和 0.54 IQR 0.31-0.95;p=0.03)。

结论

接受阿普米司特治疗的 PsA 患者中有近五分之三在 3 年后仍在接受治疗。本研究证实了其疗效和安全性。阿普米司特似乎是所有少关节炎型 PsA 患者以及伴有相关合并症的患者的一种较好的治疗选择。关键点:• 在真实世界队列和临床试验中,阿普米司特的保留率相当。• 少关节炎表型与长期治疗(即 3 年)相关。• 未观察到不同或更常见的不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验