Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
IHPI Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Surg. 2023 Jun 1;277(6):958-963. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005475. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
While there is a broad understanding that patient factors, hospital characteristics, and an individual's neighborhoods all contribute to the observed disparities, the relationship between these factors remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of neighborhood deprivation improve postoperative outcomes for White and Black Medicare beneficiaries equally.
We performed a cross-sectional Retrospective cohort study from 2014 to 2018 of 1372,487 White and Black Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who underwent an inpatient colon resection, coronary artery bypass, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or incisional hernia repair. We compared postoperative complications, readmission, and mortality by race across neighborhood deprivation. Outcomes were risk-adjusted using a multivariable logistical regression model accounting for patient factors (age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidities), admission type (elective, urgent, emergency), type of operation, and each neighborhoods Area Deprivation Index; a modern-day measure of neighborhood disadvantage that includes education, employment, housing quality, and poverty measures.
Overall, 1372,487 Medicare beneficiaries with mean age 72.1 years, 50.3% female, 91.2% White, residing in 1107,051 unique neighborhoods underwent 1 of 5 operations. The proportion of Black beneficiaries was 6.5% within the lowest deprivation neighborhoods and increased to 16.9% within the highest deprivation neighborhoods ( P <0.001). The interaction between beneficiary neighborhood and race demonstrated that the association of neighborhood on outcomes varied by race. Specifically, White beneficiaries had 1.5% absolute mortality decrease from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods [odds ratio (OR):1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-1.38; P <0.001], whereas Black beneficiaries had a 0.72% absolute mortality decrease from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24; P =0.018). Similarly, White beneficiaries had 3.6% absolute decrease in complication rate from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.21-1.28; P <0.001) while Black beneficiaries had a 1.2%% absolute decrease in complication rate from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13; P =0.017). For 30-day readmission rates, White beneficiaries realized a 2.3% absolute decrease from the highest to lowest deprivation neighborhoods (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24; P <0.001), whereas Black beneficiaries saw no change (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97-1.10; P =0.269).
Lower neighborhood deprivation is associated with improved outcomes across both White and Black Medicare beneficiaries; however, improvement in neighborhood deprivation disproportionately favored White beneficiaries. These findings provide a cautionary example of the misperception of the protective effect of higher social class for Black patients and provide a cautionary example that improvements in neighborhoods may have disparate health impact on its members.
尽管人们普遍认为患者因素、医院特征和个人所在社区都对观察到的差异有贡献,但这些因素之间的关系仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估社区贫困程度的改善是否同样能提高白人和黑人医疗保险受益人的术后结果。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,从 2014 年至 2018 年,纳入了 1372487 名年龄在 65 岁及以上的白人医疗保险受益人和黑人医疗保险受益人,他们接受了住院结肠切除术、冠状动脉旁路移植术、胆囊切除术、阑尾切除术或切口疝修补术。我们比较了不同社区贫困程度下的术后并发症、再入院和死亡率。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,对患者因素(年龄、性别、Elixhauser 合并症)、入院类型(择期、紧急、急诊)、手术类型和每个社区的区域剥夺指数进行风险调整;区域剥夺指数是衡量社区劣势的现代指标,包括教育、就业、住房质量和贫困指标。
总体而言,1372487 名医疗保险受益人平均年龄为 72.1 岁,50.3%为女性,91.2%为白人,居住在 1107051 个独特的社区,接受了 5 种手术中的一种。在最低贫困社区中,黑人受益人的比例为 6.5%,在最高贫困社区中增加到 16.9%(P<0.001)。受益人的社区与种族之间的交互作用表明,社区对结果的关联因种族而异。具体来说,白人受益人的绝对死亡率从最高贫困社区到最低贫困社区降低了 1.5%(比值比[OR]:1.32,95%置信区间[CI]:1.27-1.38;P<0.001),而黑人受益人的绝对死亡率从最高贫困社区到最低贫困社区降低了 0.72%(OR:1.13,95%CI:1.02-1.24;P=0.018)。同样,白人受益人的并发症发生率从最高贫困社区到最低贫困社区绝对降低了 3.6%(OR:1.23,95%CI:1.21-1.28;P<0.001),而黑人受益人的并发症发生率从最高贫困社区到最低贫困社区绝对降低了 1.2%(OR:1.07,95%CI:1.01-1.13;P=0.017)。对于 30 天再入院率,白人受益人的绝对下降了 2.3%,从最高贫困社区到最低贫困社区(OR:1.19,95%CI:1.02-1.24;P<0.001),而黑人受益人的再入院率没有变化(OR:1.03,95%CI:0.97-1.10;P=0.269)。
较低的社区贫困程度与白人和黑人医疗保险受益人的术后结果改善相关;然而,社区贫困程度的改善对白人受益人的益处更大。这些发现提供了一个警示性的例子,说明对黑人患者的较高社会阶层的保护作用存在误解,并提供了一个警示性的例子,说明社区的改善可能对其成员的健康产生不同的影响。