Suppr超能文献

关节镜与开放腓骨隧道在后外侧角重建中的比较。

Comparison of Arthroscopic versus Open Placement of the Fibular Tunnel in Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2023 Jul;36(9):977-987. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748897. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Precise fibular tunnel placement in posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction is crucial in restoring rotational and lateral stability. Despite the recent progress of arthroscopic PLC reconstruction techniques, landmarks for arthroscopic fibular tunnel placement and a comparison to open tunnel placement have not yet been described. This study aimed to (1) identify reasonable soft-tissue and bony landmarks, which can be identified by either arthroscopy, fluoroscopy, or open surgery in anatomic fibular tunnel placement and (2) to compare accuracy and reliability of arthroscopic fibular tunnel placement with open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, 41 magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the knee were analyzed with emphasis on distances of an ideal anatomic fibular tunnel to 11 soft-tissue and bony landmarks. Subsequently, in eight cadaver knees, the ideal fibular tunnel was created arthroscopically and with a standard open technique from antero-latero-inferior to postero-medio-superior with a 2-mm K-wire. Positions of both tunnels were compared on postinterventional computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

Based on MRI measurements, the anatomic tunnel entry should be 14.50 (±2.18) mm distal to the tip of the fibular styloid and 10.76 (±1.37) mm posterior to the anterior edge of the fibula. The anatomic fibular tunnel exit was located 12.89 (±2.35) mm below the tip of the fibular head. Arthroscopic fibular tunnel placement was reliable in all cases. Instead, in five out of the eight cases with open surgery, the fibular tunnel crossed the defined safety distance to the closest cortical edge/tibiofibular joint (distance < 8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable soft-tissue and bony landmarks of the fibular head allow arthroscopic anatomic fibular tunnel placement in PLC surgery, which shows a lower risk of tunnel malposition compared with open surgical techniques. Future studies will have to show whether clinical results of arthroscopic PLC reconstruction are in line with this study's technical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

简介

在进行后外侧角(PLC)重建时,准确放置腓骨隧道对于恢复旋转和侧向稳定性至关重要。尽管关节镜下 PLC 重建技术最近取得了进展,但对于关节镜下腓骨隧道放置的标志以及与开放隧道放置的比较尚未进行描述。本研究旨在:(1)确定合理的软组织和骨性标志,这些标志可通过关节镜、透视或开放手术在解剖腓骨隧道中识别;(2)比较关节镜下腓骨隧道放置与开放手术的准确性和可靠性。

材料和方法

在一项回顾性研究中,对 41 例膝关节的磁共振成像(MRI)进行了分析,重点关注理想解剖腓骨隧道与 11 个软组织和骨性标志的距离。随后,在 8 例尸体膝关节中,从前外下到后内上以 2mm K 线经关节镜和标准开放技术创建理想的腓骨隧道。在介入后计算机断层扫描(CT)上比较两个隧道的位置。

结果

根据 MRI 测量,解剖隧道入口应位于腓骨茎突尖端后 14.50(±2.18)mm,腓骨前缘后 10.76(±1.37)mm。解剖腓骨隧道出口位于腓骨头尖端下 12.89(±2.35)mm。所有病例均能可靠地进行关节镜下腓骨隧道放置。然而,在 8 例开放性手术中,有 5 例腓骨隧道穿过了到最近皮质边缘/胫腓关节的定义安全距离(距离<8mm)。

结论

腓骨头可靠的软组织和骨性标志允许在 PLC 手术中进行关节镜下解剖腓骨隧道放置,与开放手术技术相比,这种方法隧道位置错位的风险较低。未来的研究必须表明,关节镜 PLC 重建的临床结果是否与本研究的技术结果一致。

证据等级

III 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验