Suppr超能文献

平行组、随机、对照、非劣效性试验:高流量鼻导管与无创通气治疗急性心源性肺水肿急诊患者的比较:研究方案。

Parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for emergency patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: study protocol.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 7;12(7):e052761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052761.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an innovative oxygen-delivering technique, which has been shown to effectively decrease the intubation risk in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure of various aetiologies compared with conventional oxygen therapy. Also, it has proved to be non-inferior to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure primarily due to pneumonia. Evidence on its benefits compared with NIPPV, which is the standard of care for patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPE) with hypoxaemic respiratory distress, is limited. Therefore, we planned this study to investigate the effects of HFNC compared with NIPPV for emergency patients with ACPE.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this single-centred, non-blinded, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, we will randomly allocate 240 patients visiting the emergency department with ACPE in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HFNC or NIPPV for at least 4 hours using computer-generated mixed-block randomisation concealed by sealed opaque envelopes. The primary outcome is the intubation rate in 72 hours after randomisation. The main secondary outcomes are intolerance rate, mortality rate and treatment failure rate (a composite of intolerance, intubation and mortality). The outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to the intervention. These categorical outcomes will be analysed by calculating the risk ratio. Interim analyses evaluating the primary outcome will be performed after half of the expected sample size are recruited.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol has been approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (study ID: Si 271/2021). It has been granted the Siriraj Research and Development Fund. All participants or their authorised third parties will provide written informed consent prior to trial inclusion. The study results will be published in a peer-reviewed international journal and presented at national and international scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

TCTR20210413001.

摘要

简介

高流量鼻导管(HFNC)是一种创新的供氧技术,与常规氧疗相比,它已被证明可有效降低各种病因导致低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的插管风险。此外,在主要由肺炎引起的低氧性呼吸衰竭患者中,它与无创正压通气(NIPPV)相比已被证明非劣效。与 NIPPV 相比,HFNC 的益处证据有限,NIPPV 是急性心源性肺水肿(ACPE)合并低氧性呼吸窘迫患者的标准治疗方法。因此,我们计划进行这项研究,以调查 HFNC 与 NIPPV 治疗 ACPE 急诊患者的效果。

方法和分析

在这项单中心、非盲、平行组、随机、对照、非劣效试验中,我们将使用计算机生成的混合区组随机化,通过密封不透明信封隐藏,以 1:1 的比例将 240 名就诊于急诊科的 ACPE 患者随机分配至接受 HFNC 或 NIPPV 治疗,至少 4 小时。主要结局是随机分组后 72 小时内的插管率。主要次要结局是不耐受率、死亡率和治疗失败率(不耐受、插管和死亡的复合结局)。结局评估者和数据分析师将对干预措施设盲。这些分类结局将通过计算风险比进行分析。在预期样本量的一半被招募后,将进行中期分析以评估主要结局。

伦理和传播

本研究方案已获得 Siriraj 机构审查委员会(研究 ID:Si 271/2021)的批准。它已获得 Siriraj 研究和发展基金的资助。所有参与者或其授权的第三方将在入组前签署书面知情同意书。研究结果将发表在同行评议的国际期刊上,并在国内外科学会议上展示。

试验注册号

TCTR20210413001。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea38/9263936/38e4e6b61e70/bmjopen-2021-052761f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验