• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续护理干预对乳腺癌患者术中压疮相关并发症的疗效:系统评价与Meta分析。

The efficacy of continuing nursing interventions on intraoperative pressure ulcer-related complications in breast cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ding Lin, Ding Shuang, He Chunmei, Zhang Qifa, An Jingjing

机构信息

Operating Room, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital, Kunming, China.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2022 Jun;11(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-258.

DOI:10.21037/gs-22-258
PMID:35800736
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9253194/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study systematically reviewed the effects of continuous nursing intervention on intraoperative pressure ulcers (PUs) and related complications in breast cancer patients. The effectiveness of continuous nursing intervention for intraoperative pressure ulcers related complications in breast cancer patients is highly controversial. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically review and address this issue by means of meta-analysis.

METHODS

By searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were screened. Quality evaluation and data extraction were performed for the included studies, and meta-analysis was performed for the included RCTs using Review Manager 5.2 software. Literature was included in strict compliance with the PICOS principle, and bias risk was analyzed by -test and funnel plot.

RESULTS

A total of 1,431 patients were enrolled in 9 studies, and meta-analysis showed that there was a significant statistical difference between the experimental group and the control group in the incidence of PUs [odds ratio (OR) =0.18, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.13-0.24, P<0.00001], the Braden pressure ulcer risk score after nursing [mean difference (MD) =2.64, 95% CI: 1.47-3.81, P<0.0001], and the quality of life after nursing (MD =9.76, 95% CI: 6.82-12.69, P<0.00001).

DISCUSSION

Continuous care can reduce the incidence of PUs in patients with advanced breast cancer, reduce the severity of wounds in the healing process of PUs, and improve the knowledge of PUs in patients with advanced breast cancer risk.

摘要

背景

本研究系统评价了连续性护理干预对乳腺癌患者术中压疮及相关并发症的影响。连续性护理干预对乳腺癌患者术中压疮相关并发症的有效性存在高度争议。因此,有必要通过荟萃分析对这一问题进行系统评价并加以解决。

方法

通过检索考克兰图书馆、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase以及中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)进行筛选。对纳入研究进行质量评价和数据提取,使用Review Manager 5.2软件对纳入的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。严格按照PICOS原则纳入文献,并通过检验和漏斗图分析偏倚风险。

结果

9项研究共纳入1431例患者,荟萃分析显示,试验组与对照组在压疮发生率[比值比(OR)=0.18,95%置信区间(95%CI):0.13-0.24,P<0.00001]、护理后Braden压疮风险评分[平均差(MD)=2.64,95%CI:1.47-3.81,P<0.0001]以及护理后生活质量(MD =9.76,95%CI:6.82-12.69,P<0.00001)方面存在显著统计学差异。

讨论

连续性护理可降低晚期乳腺癌患者压疮的发生率,减轻压疮愈合过程中伤口的严重程度,并提高晚期乳腺癌风险患者对压疮的认知。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of continuing nursing interventions on intraoperative pressure ulcer-related complications in breast cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.持续护理干预对乳腺癌患者术中压疮相关并发症的疗效:系统评价与Meta分析。
Gland Surg. 2022 Jun;11(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-258.
2
Effects of comprehensive nursing intervention on pressure ulcer after traumatic brain injury surgery: A meta-analysis.综合护理干预对颅脑损伤术后压疮的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Mar;21(3):e14494. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14494. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults.成人压力性溃疡预防中的体位调整
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 3;2014(4):CD009958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009958.pub2.
4
Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.《Braden 量表对重症监护压疮风险预测的有效性:一项荟萃分析》。
Nurs Crit Care. 2020 May;25(3):165-170. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12500. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
Effects of cluster nursing interventions on the prevention of pressure ulcers in intensive care units patients: A meta-analysis.集束化护理干预对预防重症监护病房患者压疮的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Mar;21(3):e14776. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14776.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of muscle relaxation training conventional nursing on the depression, anxiety and life quality of patients with breast cancer.肌肉放松训练与传统护理对乳腺癌患者抑郁、焦虑及生活质量影响的系统评价与Meta分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Mar;11(3):548-558. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-428.
7
Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.压力性溃疡的预防:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(2):1-104. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Nonpharmacologic Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers in Older Patients: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (The Software ENgine for the Assessment and optimization of drug and non-drug Therapy in Older peRsons [SENATOR] Definition of Optimal Evidence-Based Non-drug Therapies in Older People [ONTOP] Series).预防老年患者压疮的非药物干预措施:系统评价概述(老年人药物和非药物治疗评估与优化软件[SENATOR]老年人最佳循证非药物治疗定义[ONTOP]系列)
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):370.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.091. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
Comparing alternating pressure mattresses and high-specification foam mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: the PRESSURE 2 RCT.比较交替式压力床垫和高规格泡沫床垫预防高危患者压疮的效果:PRESSURE 2 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(52):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23520.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of psychological intervention nursing on the quality of life of breast cancer patients.心理干预护理对乳腺癌患者生活质量的疗效及安全性的系统评价与Meta分析
Gland Surg. 2022 May;11(5):882-891. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-206.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalized and continuous care intervention affects rehabilitation, living quality, and negative emotions of patients with breast cancer.个性化持续护理干预对乳腺癌患者的康复、生活质量及负性情绪有影响。
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 19;14(6):876-883. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.876.
2
Clarification of issues brought up by ''.对由“...”提出的问题进行澄清。
Gland Surg. 2022 Aug;11(8):1445-1446. doi: 10.21037/gs-2022-06.
3
Is continuing nursing interventions reduce the incidence of intraoperative pressure ulcers for breast cancer patients?持续护理干预措施是否能降低乳腺癌患者术中压疮的发生率?
Gland Surg. 2022 Aug;11(8):1443-1444. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-388.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes of nursing staff towards pressure ulcer prevention in primary and specialised health care: A correlational cross-sectional study.医护人员对初级和专科保健中的压疮预防的态度:一项相关性横断面研究。
Int Wound J. 2022 Feb;19(2):399-410. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13641. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
2
Barriers and enablers to the implementation of evidence-based practice in pressure ulcer prevention and management in an integrated community care setting: A qualitative study informed by the theoretical domains framework.在社区综合护理环境中预防和管理压疮的循证实践实施的障碍和促进因素:基于理论领域框架的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):766-779. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13322. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
Using the 'aSSKINg' model in pressure ulcer prevention and care planning.使用“aSSKINg”模型进行压疮预防和护理计划。
Nurs Stand. 2021 Feb 3;36(2):61-66. doi: 10.7748/ns.2021.e11674. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
4
Wnt signaling in breast cancer: biological mechanisms, challenges and opportunities.Wnt 信号通路在乳腺癌中的作用:生物学机制、挑战与机遇。
Mol Cancer. 2020 Nov 24;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01276-5.
5
A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and molecular aberrations.化生性乳腺癌的全面概述:临床特征和分子异常。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Nov 4;22(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01353-z.
6
Finnish and Swedish prehospital emergency care providers' knowledge and attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention.芬兰语和瑞典语的院前急救护理人员对压疮预防的知识和态度。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Mar;55:100873. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100873. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale for Patients in Intensive Care Units.评估一种新的 ICU 患者压疮风险评估量表的效度和信度。
Wound Manag Prev. 2020 Feb;66(2):24-33. doi: 10.25270/wmp.2020.2.2433.
8
Effect of preventive care interventions on pressure ulcer rates in a national sample of rural and urban nursing units: Longitudinal associations over 4 years.预防保健干预对全国农村和城市护理单元压疮发生率的影响:4 年的纵向关联。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 May;105:103455. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103455. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
Identification and validation of immune-related lncRNA prognostic signature for breast cancer.鉴定和验证与免疫相关的长链非编码 RNA 预后标志物用于乳腺癌。
Genomics. 2020 May;112(3):2640-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.《Braden 量表对重症监护压疮风险预测的有效性:一项荟萃分析》。
Nurs Crit Care. 2020 May;25(3):165-170. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12500. Epub 2020 Jan 27.