Leisti Tuomas, Vaahteranoksa Mikko, Olives Jean-Luc, Peltoketo Veli-Tapani, Häkkinen Jukka
Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Huawei Technologies Oy (Finland) Co., Ltd., Helsinki, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 21;13:867874. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867874. eCollection 2022.
Imaging science has approached subjective image quality (IQ) as a perceptual phenomenon, with an emphasis on thresholds of defects. The paradigmatic design of subjective IQ estimation, the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) method, however, requires viewers to make decisions. We investigated decision strategies in three experiments both by asking the research participants to give reasons for their decisions and by examining the decision times. We found that typical for larger quality differences is a smaller set of subjective attributes, resulting from convergent attention toward the most salient attribute, leading to faster decisions and better accuracy. Smaller differences are characterized by divergent attention toward different attributes and an emphasis on preferential attributes instead of defects. In larger differences, attributes have sigmoidal relationships between their visibility and their occurrence in explanations. For other attributes, this relationship is more random. We also examined decision times in different attribute configurations to clarify the heuristics of IQ estimation, and we distinguished a top-down-oriented Take-the-Best heuristic and a bottom-up visual salience-based heuristic. In all experiments, heuristic one-reason decision-making endured as a prevailing strategy independent of quality difference or task.
成像科学将主观图像质量(IQ)视为一种感知现象,重点关注缺陷阈值。然而,主观IQ评估的典型设计——二选一强制选择(2AFC)方法,要求观察者做出决策。我们通过要求研究参与者给出决策理由并检查决策时间,在三个实验中研究了决策策略。我们发现,对于较大的质量差异,典型情况是主观属性集较小,这是由于注意力集中在最突出的属性上,从而导致决策更快且准确性更高。较小的差异则表现为对不同属性的分散注意力以及对偏好属性而非缺陷的强调。在较大差异中,属性在其可见性与其在解释中的出现之间具有S形关系。对于其他属性,这种关系则更为随机。我们还检查了不同属性配置下的决策时间,以阐明IQ评估的启发式方法,并区分了一种自上而下的“采用最佳”启发式方法和一种基于自下而上视觉显著性的启发式方法。在所有实验中,启发式的单理由决策作为一种普遍策略持续存在,与质量差异或任务无关。