Ericson Keith M Marzilli, White John Myles, Laibson David, Cohen Jonathan D
School of Management, Boston University National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Department of Psychology, Princeton University.
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):826-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797615572232. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
Heuristic models have been proposed for many domains involving choice. We conducted an out-of-sample, cross-validated comparison of heuristic models of intertemporal choice (which can account for many of the known intertemporal choice anomalies) and discounting models. Heuristic models outperformed traditional utility-discounting models, including models of exponential and hyperbolic discounting. The best-performing models predicted choices by using a weighted average of absolute differences and relative percentage differences of the attributes of the goods in a choice set. We concluded that heuristic models explain time-money trade-off choices in experiments better than do utility-discounting models.
针对许多涉及选择的领域,人们提出了启发式模型。我们对跨期选择的启发式模型(它可以解释许多已知的跨期选择异常现象)和贴现模型进行了样本外交叉验证比较。启发式模型的表现优于传统的效用贴现模型,包括指数贴现模型和双曲线贴现模型。表现最佳的模型通过对选择集中商品属性的绝对差异和相对百分比差异进行加权平均来预测选择。我们得出结论,在实验中,启发式模型比效用贴现模型能更好地解释时间与金钱的权衡选择。