• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Money earlier or later? Simple heuristics explain intertemporal choices better than delay discounting does.早得钱还是晚得钱?简单启发式策略比延迟折扣更能解释跨期选择。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):826-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797615572232. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
2
The cancellation heuristic in intertemporal choice shifts people's time preferences.时间偏好的跨期选择中的取消启发式会改变人们的时间偏好。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 17;12(1):4627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07906-w.
3
Differences in Discounting Behavior and Brain Responses for Food and Money Reward.食物和金钱奖励的折扣行为和大脑反应的差异。
eNeuro. 2024 Apr 3;11(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0153-23.2024. Print 2024 Apr.
4
Weighing outcomes by time or against time? Evaluation rules in intertemporal choice.权衡时间或与时间的结果?跨期选择中的评价规则。
Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;38(3):399-438. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12104. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
5
The delay-reward heuristic: What do people expect in intertemporal choice tasks?延迟奖励启发式:人们在跨期选择任务中期望得到什么?
Judgm Decis Mak. 2020 Sep;15(5):611-629.
6
A probabilistic, dynamic, and attribute-wise model of intertemporal choice.一种跨期选择的概率性、动态性和属性导向模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1489-514. doi: 10.1037/a0035976. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
7
Single- and cross-commodity discounting among cocaine addicts: the commodity and its temporal location determine discounting rate.可卡因成瘾者的单一和交叉商品贴现:商品及其时间位置决定贴现率。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Sep;217(2):177-87. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2272-x. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
8
Temporal discounting when outcomes are experienced in the moment: Validation of a novel paradigm and comparison with a classic hypothetical intertemporal choice task.当结果在当下体验时的时间折扣:一种新颖范式的验证及其与经典假设跨期选择任务的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251480. eCollection 2021.
9
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
10
Glucose-specific signaling effects on delay discounting in intertemporal choice.葡萄糖特异性信号对跨期选择中延迟折扣的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2017 Feb 1;169:195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Grit, discounting, & time inconsistency.坚毅、贴现与时间不一致性。
J Risk Uncertain. 2025;70(3):201-223. doi: 10.1007/s11166-025-09456-8. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
Ambiguity preferences in intertemporal and risky choice: A large-scale study using drift-diffusion modelling.跨期与风险选择中的模糊性偏好:一项使用漂移扩散模型的大规模研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02709-2.
3
Privacy Relevance and Disclosure Intention in Mobile Apps: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Privacy Calculus and Temporal Distance.移动应用中的隐私相关性与披露意图:隐私权衡和时间距离的中介与调节作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;15(3):324. doi: 10.3390/bs15030324.
4
Neural reward system reflects individual value comparison strategy in cost-benefit decisions.神经奖励系统反映了个体在成本效益决策中的价值比较策略。
Commun Biol. 2024 Nov 12;7(1):1488. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07210-5.
5
Attribute latencies causally shape intertemporal decisions.属性潜伏期会对跨期决策产生因果影响。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 5;15(1):2948. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46657-2.
6
Differences in Discounting Behavior and Brain Responses for Food and Money Reward.食物和金钱奖励的折扣行为和大脑反应的差异。
eNeuro. 2024 Apr 3;11(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0153-23.2024. Print 2024 Apr.
7
The date/delay effect in intertemporal choice: A combined fMRI and eye-tracking study.时间间隔选择中的日期/延迟效应:一项 fMRI 和眼动追踪研究的结合。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 15;45(3):e26585. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26585.
8
Effort Foraging Task reveals positive correlation between individual differences in the cost of cognitive and physical effort in humans.努力觅食任务揭示了人类在认知和体力努力成本上的个体差异之间存在正相关关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 12;120(50):e2221510120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221510120. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
9
Neural mechanisms of intertemporal and risky decision-making in individuals with internet use disorder: A perspective from directed functional connectivity.网络使用障碍个体跨期决策和风险决策的神经机制:来自有向功能连接的视角。
J Behav Addict. 2023 Dec 4;12(4):907-919. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00068. Print 2023 Dec 22.
10
Measuring Time Preferences.测量时间偏好。
J Econ Lit. 2020 Jun;58(2):299-347. doi: 10.1257/jel.20191074.

本文引用的文献

1
DRIFT: an analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice.DRIFT:时间偏好选择中结果框架的分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):573-88. doi: 10.1037/a0029177. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
2
The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs.跨期权衡的心理学。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):925-44. doi: 10.1037/a0019619.
3
Individual differences in delay discounting: relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex.延迟折扣中的个体差异:与智力、工作记忆及前额叶前部皮质的关系。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;19(9):904-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02175.x.
4
Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: a query-theory account.跨期选择中的非对称贴现:一种查询理论解释
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jun;18(6):516-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.x.
5
Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.决策场理论:一种在不确定环境中进行决策的动态认知方法。
Psychol Rev. 1993 Jul;100(3):432-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432.
6
Reason-based choice.基于理性的选择。
Cognition. 1993 Oct-Nov;49(1-2):11-36. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-s.
7
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.决策的框架与选择的心理学。
Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683.
8
Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.似是而非的奖励:冲动与冲动控制的行为理论
Psychol Bull. 1975 Jul;82(4):463-96. doi: 10.1037/h0076860.

早得钱还是晚得钱?简单启发式策略比延迟折扣更能解释跨期选择。

Money earlier or later? Simple heuristics explain intertemporal choices better than delay discounting does.

作者信息

Ericson Keith M Marzilli, White John Myles, Laibson David, Cohen Jonathan D

机构信息

School of Management, Boston University National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Department of Psychology, Princeton University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):826-33. doi: 10.1177/0956797615572232. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1177/0956797615572232
PMID:25911124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4516222/
Abstract

Heuristic models have been proposed for many domains involving choice. We conducted an out-of-sample, cross-validated comparison of heuristic models of intertemporal choice (which can account for many of the known intertemporal choice anomalies) and discounting models. Heuristic models outperformed traditional utility-discounting models, including models of exponential and hyperbolic discounting. The best-performing models predicted choices by using a weighted average of absolute differences and relative percentage differences of the attributes of the goods in a choice set. We concluded that heuristic models explain time-money trade-off choices in experiments better than do utility-discounting models.

摘要

针对许多涉及选择的领域,人们提出了启发式模型。我们对跨期选择的启发式模型(它可以解释许多已知的跨期选择异常现象)和贴现模型进行了样本外交叉验证比较。启发式模型的表现优于传统的效用贴现模型,包括指数贴现模型和双曲线贴现模型。表现最佳的模型通过对选择集中商品属性的绝对差异和相对百分比差异进行加权平均来预测选择。我们得出结论,在实验中,启发式模型比效用贴现模型能更好地解释时间与金钱的权衡选择。