• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性精索静脉曲张患者硬化栓塞治疗与显微外科精索静脉低位结扎术的临床疗效比较。

Clinical efficacy comparison of sclerosing embolization with 3% polidocanol and the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in primary varicocele patients.

机构信息

Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.

Vascular Surgery Department, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Andrologia. 2022 Nov;54(10):e14530. doi: 10.1111/and.14530. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1111/and.14530
PMID:35801615
Abstract

Varicocele is a more common male genitourinary system disease with sperm quality dysfunction or discomfort. This study was aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of sclerosing embolization with 3% polidocanol and the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in treating primary varicocele. Total of 59 patients with primary varicocele receiving a 3-month postoperative follow-up were included to analyse their biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes, including the operative time, hospitalization time, postoperative recurrence rates, and complication rate. Nineteen patients were treated with sclerosing embolization with 3% polidocanol (SE group), while 40 patients were treated with microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV group). For the SE group, 17 patients were treated on the left side, and two patients have treated on both without recurrences and complications during the follow-up period. For the MSV group, three patients were treated bilaterally, and 36 patients were treated separately on the left side with a total 5% recurrence rate and 10% complication rate. The duration of surgery and the hospitalization time of the SE group (46.2 ± 9.79 min and 2.53 ± 0.90 days, respectively) are significantly lower than MSV group (100.5 ± 13.76 min and 3.6 ± 1.58 days, respectively), p < 0.05. The total sperm count at 3 months was significantly higher in the SE group than in the MSV group (p < 0.05). In summary, sclerosing embolization is more effective for varicocele in improving sperm quality, shortening recovery time, and reducing recurrence rates and complications.

摘要

精索静脉曲张是一种较为常见的男性生殖泌尿系统疾病,可导致精子质量下降或出现不适症状。本研究旨在比较 3%聚多卡醇硬化栓塞术和显微镜下精索内静脉结扎术治疗原发性精索静脉曲张的临床疗效。共纳入 59 例原发性精索静脉曲张患者,术后随访 3 个月,分析其生化参数和临床结局,包括手术时间、住院时间、术后复发率和并发症发生率。其中 19 例患者接受 3%聚多卡醇硬化栓塞术(SE 组),40 例患者接受显微镜下精索内静脉结扎术(MSV 组)。SE 组左侧治疗 17 例,双侧治疗 2 例,随访期间无复发和并发症。MSV 组双侧治疗 3 例,左侧单独治疗 36 例,总复发率为 5%,并发症发生率为 10%。SE 组的手术时间和住院时间(46.2±9.79 分钟和 2.53±0.90 天)明显短于 MSV 组(100.5±13.76 分钟和 3.6±1.58 天),p<0.05。SE 组术后 3 个月的总精子计数明显高于 MSV 组(p<0.05)。总之,与显微镜下精索内静脉结扎术相比,硬化栓塞术治疗精索静脉曲张在改善精子质量、缩短恢复时间、降低复发率和并发症方面更具优势。

相似文献

1
Clinical efficacy comparison of sclerosing embolization with 3% polidocanol and the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in primary varicocele patients.原发性精索静脉曲张患者硬化栓塞治疗与显微外科精索静脉低位结扎术的临床疗效比较。
Andrologia. 2022 Nov;54(10):e14530. doi: 10.1111/and.14530. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
2
[Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis and ligation of gubernacular veins: Evaluation of clinical effects].[经腹股沟下显微精索静脉结扎术联合睾丸松解及精索静脉结扎术:临床效果评估]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2018 Mar;24(3):226-230.
3
Retroperitoneal high ligation versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: Effectiveness of two different varicocelectomy techniques on the treatment of painful varicocele.腹膜后高位结扎术与精索内静脉结扎术治疗精索静脉曲张的疗效比较:两种不同精索静脉曲张手术技术治疗精索静脉曲张性疼痛的效果。
Andrologia. 2019 Aug;51(7):e13293. doi: 10.1111/and.13293. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Comparison between Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy with and without Testicular Delivery for Infertile Men: Is Testicular Delivery an Unnecessary Procedure.对不育男性进行或不进行睾丸游离的显微外科腹股沟下精索静脉结扎术的比较:睾丸游离是否为不必要的步骤。
Urol J. 2015 Sep 4;12(4):2261-6.
5
Fate of Recurrent or Persistent Varicocele in the Era of Assisted Reproduction Technology: Microsurgical Subinguinal Redo Varicocelectomy Versus Observation.辅助生殖技术时代复发性或持续性精索静脉曲张的转归:显微外科腹股沟下再次精索静脉结扎术与观察对比
Urology. 2018 Jul;117:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.046. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
6
Evaluation of clinical effects of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery.评价显微外科精索下腹股沟途径精索静脉结扎术联合与不联合睾丸输送的临床效果。
Andrologia. 2020 Jul;52(6):e13605. doi: 10.1111/and.13605. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for male factor subfertility: ten-year experience.精索内显微外科精索静脉结扎术治疗男性因素不育症:十年经验。
Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Aug;19(4):334-40. doi: 10.12809/hkmj133884. Epub 2013 May 6.
8
Microsurgical varicocelectomy for clinical varicocele: A review for potential new indications.临床精索静脉曲张的显微外科精索静脉结扎术:潜在新适应证综述
Andrologia. 2017 Dec;49(10). doi: 10.1111/and.12827. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
9
Clinical effectiveness of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with enhanced recovery after surgery for varicocele.显微镜下腹股沟下精索静脉高位结扎术联合术后加速康复治疗精索静脉曲张的临床疗效
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Oct;10(10):3862-3872. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-908.
10
Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique.不育男性可触及精索静脉曲张的治疗:一项确定最佳技术的荟萃分析
J Androl. 2009 Jan-Feb;30(1):33-40. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.108.005967. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
EUS-guided lauromacrogol ablation with different concentrations of lauromacrogol for the treatment of pancreatic cystic neoplasm: A randomized controlled study.超声内镜引导下不同浓度聚桂醇消融治疗胰腺囊性肿瘤的随机对照研究
Endosc Ultrasound. 2025 Jan-Feb;14(1):4-12. doi: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000105. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Challenging cases of adherent periarterial vein during subinguinal Fisch technique and subinguinal micro-varicocelecotmy and sclerotherapy: a prospective comparative study.腹股沟下 Fisch 技术、腹股沟下显微精索静脉曲张切除术及硬化疗法中动脉周围粘连静脉的疑难病例:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Basic Clin Androl. 2025 Feb 4;35(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12610-025-00250-9.