Luo Jing, Zhang Bo, Cao Mengyang, Roberts Brent W
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Texas A&M University, College Station, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2023 May;27(2):128-194. doi: 10.1177/10888683221104002. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
The current study presented the first meta-analytic review on the associations between the Big Five personality traits and stress measured under different conceptualizations (stressor exposure, psychological and physiological stress responses) using a total of 1,575 effect sizes drawn from 298 samples. Overall, neuroticism was found to be positively related to stress, whereas extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness were negatively linked to stress. When stress assessed under different conceptualizations was tested, only neuroticism, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were related to stressor exposure. All of the Big Five personality traits were significantly associated with psychological stress perception, whereas the five personality traits showed weak to null associations with physiological stress response. Further moderation analyses suggested that the associations between personality traits and stress under different conceptualizations were also contingent upon different characteristics of stress, sample, study design, and measures. The results supported the important role of personality traits in individual differences in stress.
本研究首次进行了荟萃分析综述,探讨了大五人格特质与在不同概念化下测量的压力(应激源暴露、心理和生理应激反应)之间的关联,共使用了来自298个样本的1575个效应量。总体而言,神经质与压力呈正相关,而外向性、宜人性、尽责性和开放性与压力呈负相关。当对在不同概念化下评估的压力进行测试时,只有神经质、宜人性和尽责性与应激源暴露有关。所有大五人格特质都与心理压力感知显著相关,而这五种人格特质与生理应激反应的关联较弱或不存在。进一步的调节分析表明,不同概念化下人格特质与压力之间的关联也取决于压力、样本、研究设计和测量的不同特征。研究结果支持了人格特质在压力个体差异中的重要作用。