Agasarov Lev G, Konchugova Tatiana V, Kulchitskaya Detelina B, Davyan Olga S, Apkhanova Tatiana V, Fesyun Anatoliy D, Rachin Andrey P, Yakovlev Maxim Yu, Terentev Kirill V, Sanina Natalia P
Federal State Budgetary Institution "National medical research center for rehabilitation and balneology", Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia; Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia; Non-profit Partnership "Professional association of reflexologists".
Federal State Budgetary Institution "National medical research center for rehabilitation and balneology", Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia; Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow.
Eur J Transl Myol. 2022 Jul 8;32(3):10684. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2022.10684.
The characteristic resistance of dorsopathies to conventional therapy explains the attention to new technologies that combine several therapeutic links and, in particular, ozone therapy. The study involved 90 patients under the age of 55 in the exacerbation phase of lumbar and sacrum dorsopathy with the leading vascular component. The patients were divided into three groups, in which basic medical and physical treatment was given. At the same time, ozone therapy was used the first two groups: the 1st group received standard ozone therapy, with a predominant selection of algic zones, the 2nd - according to the rules of biopuncture, affecting the complex of segmental, distant and "vascular" points. In the 3rd control group, the correction was limited to a standard therapeutic complex. The verification of the observed changes was carried out through clinical, psychological and electrophysiological analysis. As a result, both ozone therapy schemes (effective in 69% and 73% of observations respectively) were found to have a reliable advantage over the base complex, where 49% of patients demonstrated improvement. Differences within the ozone therapy groups themselves related to the achievement of a stable effect (in the 2nd group 2.6 days earlier) and the degree of reduction of vaso-reflex reactions (observed in 50% and 75% of observations respectively). Thus, by bringing in additional control methods, it has been proven that the implementation of ozone therapy in compliance with the rules of biopuncture ensures faster and more sustainable effects.
背部疾病对传统治疗的耐药特性解释了为何人们会关注结合多种治疗环节的新技术,尤其是臭氧疗法。该研究纳入了90名55岁以下处于腰椎和骶椎疾病加重期且主要伴有血管病变的患者。这些患者被分为三组,均接受基础药物和物理治疗。与此同时,前两组采用了臭氧疗法:第一组接受标准臭氧疗法,主要选择疼痛区域;第二组按照生物针刺规则,作用于节段性、远隔性和“血管性”穴位复合体。第三组为对照组,仅采用标准治疗方案。通过临床、心理和电生理分析对观察到的变化进行验证。结果发现,两种臭氧疗法方案(分别在69%和73%的观察中有效)相对于基础治疗方案均具有显著优势,基础治疗方案中只有49%的患者病情有所改善。臭氧疗法组内部的差异体现在达到稳定疗效的时间(第二组提前2.6天)以及血管反射反应的减轻程度(分别在50%和75%的观察中出现)。因此,通过引入额外的对照方法,已证明按照生物针刺规则实施臭氧疗法可确保更快且更持久的疗效。