• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多血统多基因风险评分与前列腺癌特定年龄风险的验证:不同人群中的荟萃分析。

Validation of a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score and age-specific risks of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis within diverse populations.

机构信息

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States.

Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2022 Jul 8;11:e78304. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78304.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.78304
PMID:35801699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9322982/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We recently developed a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score (PRS) that effectively stratifies prostate cancer risk across populations. In this study, we validated the performance of the PRS in the multi-ancestry Million Veteran Program and additional independent studies.

METHODS

Within each ancestry population, the association of PRS with prostate cancer risk was evaluated separately in each case-control study and then combined in a fixed-effects inverse-variance-weighted meta-analysis. We further assessed the effect modification by age and estimated the age-specific absolute risk of prostate cancer for each ancestry population.

RESULTS

The PRS was evaluated in 31,925 cases and 490,507 controls, including men from European (22,049 cases, 414,249 controls), African (8794 cases, 55,657 controls), and Hispanic (1082 cases, 20,601 controls) populations. Comparing men in the top decile (90-100% of the PRS) to the average 40-60% PRS category, the prostate cancer odds ratio (OR) was 3.8-fold in European ancestry men (95% CI = 3.62-3.96), 2.8-fold in African ancestry men (95% CI = 2.59-3.03), and 3.2-fold in Hispanic men (95% CI = 2.64-3.92). The PRS did not discriminate risk of aggressive versus nonaggressive prostate cancer. However, the OR diminished with advancing age (European ancestry men in the top decile: ≤55 years, OR = 7.11; 55-60 years, OR = 4.26; >70 years, OR = 2.79). Men in the top PRS decile reached 5% absolute prostate cancer risk ~10 years younger than men in the 40-60% PRS category.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings validate the multi-ancestry PRS as an effective prostate cancer risk stratification tool across populations. A clinical study of PRS is warranted to determine whether the PRS could be used for risk-stratified screening and early detection.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers U19 CA214253 to C.A.H., U01 CA257328 to C.A.H., U19 CA148537 to C.A.H., R01 CA165862 to C.A.H., K99 CA246063 to B.F.D, and T32CA229110 to F.C), the Prostate Cancer Foundation (grants 21YOUN11 to B.F.D. and 20CHAS03 to C.A.H.), the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation Los Angeles Founder Chapter to B.F.D, and the Million Veteran Program-MVP017. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 42195. This research is based on data from the Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, and the Veterans Health Administration. This publication does not represent the views of the Department of Veteran Affairs or the United States Government.

摘要

背景

我们最近开发了一种多民族多基因风险评分(PRS),可有效跨人群分层前列腺癌风险。在这项研究中,我们在多民族百万退伍军人计划和其他独立研究中验证了 PRS 的性能。

方法

在每个祖先群体内,分别在每个病例对照研究中评估 PRS 与前列腺癌风险的关联,然后在固定效应逆方差加权荟萃分析中进行合并。我们进一步评估了年龄的效应修饰,并估计了每个祖先群体的特定年龄的前列腺癌绝对风险。

结果

该 PRS 在 31925 例病例和 490507 例对照中进行了评估,包括来自欧洲(22049 例,414249 例对照)、非洲(8794 例,55657 例对照)和西班牙裔(1082 例,20601 例对照)人群的男性。将处于最高十分位数(PRS 的 90%-100%)的男性与平均 40%-60%PRS 类别的男性进行比较,欧洲裔男性的前列腺癌比值比(OR)为 3.8 倍(95%CI=3.62-3.96),非洲裔男性为 2.8 倍(95%CI=2.59-3.03),西班牙裔男性为 3.2 倍(95%CI=2.64-3.92)。PRS 不能区分侵袭性与非侵袭性前列腺癌的风险。然而,随着年龄的增长,OR 逐渐降低(欧洲裔男性处于最高十分位数:≤55 岁,OR=7.11;55-60 岁,OR=4.26;>70 岁,OR=2.79)。处于最高 PRS 十分位数的男性达到 5%的前列腺癌绝对风险的年龄比处于 40%-60%PRS 类别男性早约 10 年。

结论

我们的研究结果验证了多民族 PRS 是一种有效的跨人群前列腺癌风险分层工具。需要进行 PRS 的临床研究,以确定 PRS 是否可用于风险分层筛查和早期检测。

资助

这项工作得到了美国国立卫生研究院国家癌症研究所(CAH 博士的 U19 CA214253、U01 CA257328、U19 CA148537、R01 CA165862、BFD 博士的 K99 CA246063 和 FC 博士的 T32CA229110 等资助)、前列腺癌基金会(BFD 博士的 21YOUN11 和 CAH 博士的 20CHAS03 等资助)、成就奖励大学生科学基金会洛杉矶创始人分会(BFD 博士)和百万退伍军人计划-MVP017。这项研究是使用英国生物银行资源进行的,申请编号为 42195。这项研究基于百万退伍军人计划、研究与发展办公室和退伍军人健康管理局的数据。本出版物不代表退伍军人事务部或美国政府的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/c5f73beb3508/elife-78304-app1-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/dada7ad25ed7/elife-78304-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/a9bd2574a811/elife-78304-fig1-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/5766184cff9d/elife-78304-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/7b46f48e91e5/elife-78304-fig2-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/5c6c2ef86cc3/elife-78304-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/c5f73beb3508/elife-78304-app1-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/dada7ad25ed7/elife-78304-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/a9bd2574a811/elife-78304-fig1-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/5766184cff9d/elife-78304-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/7b46f48e91e5/elife-78304-fig2-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/5c6c2ef86cc3/elife-78304-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4514/9322982/c5f73beb3508/elife-78304-app1-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score and age-specific risks of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis within diverse populations.多血统多基因风险评分与前列腺癌特定年龄风险的验证:不同人群中的荟萃分析。
Elife. 2022 Jul 8;11:e78304. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78304.
2
Evaluating approaches for constructing polygenic risk scores for prostate cancer in men of African and European ancestry.评估构建非洲裔和欧洲裔男性前列腺癌多基因风险评分的方法。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Jul 6;110(7):1200-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Evidence of Novel Susceptibility Variants for Prostate Cancer and a Multiancestry Polygenic Risk Score Associated with Aggressive Disease in Men of African Ancestry.新型前列腺癌易感变异证据和多祖先种系多基因风险评分与非洲裔男性侵袭性疾病相关。
Eur Urol. 2023 Jul;84(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.01.022. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
4
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
5
Evaluation of a Multiethnic Polygenic Risk Score Model for Prostate Cancer.多民族多基因风险评分模型评估前列腺癌。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 May 9;114(5):771-774. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab058.
6
Evaluating Approaches for Constructing Polygenic Risk Scores for Prostate Cancer in Men of African and European Ancestry.评估为非洲和欧洲血统男性构建前列腺癌多基因风险评分的方法。
medRxiv. 2023 May 15:2023.05.12.23289860. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.12.23289860.
7
Performance of Polygenic Risk Scores for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Populations of African Descent.非洲裔人群中原发性开角型青光眼多基因风险评分的表现
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 1;143(1):7-14. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4784.
8
Testing the generalizability of ancestry-specific polygenic risk scores to predict prostate cancer in sub-Saharan Africa.检测基于祖源的多基因风险评分在撒哈拉以南非洲预测前列腺癌的泛化能力。
Genome Biol. 2022 Sep 13;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02766-z.
9
Genome-wide polygenic risk score for retinopathy of type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病视网膜病变的全基因组多基因风险评分。
Hum Mol Genet. 2021 May 29;30(10):952-960. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddab067.
10
Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Heart Disease Based on an Ancestrally Diverse Genome-Wide Association Study and Population-Specific Optimization.基于具有多种祖先的全基因组关联研究和人群特异性优化的冠心病多祖先多基因风险评分。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2024 Jun;17(3):e004272. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.123.004272. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A landmark federal interagency collaboration to promote data science in health care: Million Veteran Program-Computational Health Analytics for Medical Precision to Improve Outcomes Now.一项具有里程碑意义的联邦跨部门合作,旨在促进医疗保健领域的数据科学发展:百万退伍军人计划——用于医疗精准性以改善当前治疗效果的计算健康分析。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Nov 6;7(4):ooae126. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae126. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Understanding the Biological Basis of Polygenic Risk Scores and Disparities in Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Genomic Analysis.了解前列腺癌多基因风险评分的生物学基础及差异:一项全面的基因组分析
Cancer Inform. 2024 Oct 21;23:11769351241276319. doi: 10.1177/11769351241276319. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a Multiethnic Polygenic Risk Score Model for Prostate Cancer.多民族多基因风险评分模型评估前列腺癌。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 May 9;114(5):771-774. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab058.
2
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021.NCCN 指南解读:前列腺癌,第 1.2021 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Feb 2;19(2):134-143. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008.
3
Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction.
Heterogeneous genetic architectures of prostate cancer susceptibility in sub-Saharan Africa.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区前列腺癌易感性的异质性遗传结构。
Nat Genet. 2024 Oct;56(10):2093-2103. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01931-3. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
4
Circum-Mediterranean influence in the Y-chromosome lineages associated with prostate cancer in Mexican men: A Converso heritage founder effect?环地中海地区对墨西哥男性前列腺癌相关 Y 染色体谱系的影响:康索罗特人遗传创始人效应?
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 16;19(8):e0308092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308092. eCollection 2024.
5
Colorectal Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Is Associated With Screening Colonoscopy Findings but Not Follow-Up Outcomes.结直肠癌多基因风险评分与筛查结肠镜检查结果相关,但与随访结果无关。
Gastro Hep Adv. 2023 Oct 10;3(2):151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.10.001. eCollection 2024.
6
Early Prostate Cancer Deaths Among Men With Higher vs Lower Genetic Risk.具有较高遗传风险与较低遗传风险的男性中前列腺癌早期死亡的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420034. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20034.
7
Screening guidelines for individuals at increased risk for prostate cancer.前列腺癌高危个体的筛查指南。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Oct;18(10):E301-E307. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8710.
8
Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools.多基因评分的最新进展:转化、公平性、方法与FAIR工具
Genome Med. 2024 Feb 19;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01304-9.
9
Characterizing prostate cancer risk through multi-ancestry genome-wide discovery of 187 novel risk variants.通过对 187 个新风险变体的多祖裔全基因组发现,描绘前列腺癌风险。
Nat Genet. 2023 Dec;55(12):2065-2074. doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01534-4. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
10
Heterogeneous genetic architectures and evolutionary genomics of prostate cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区前列腺癌的异质性遗传结构与进化基因组学
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 12:rs.3.rs-3378303. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3378303/v1.
泛种族全基因组关联荟萃分析前列腺癌确定新的易感性位点并为遗传风险预测提供信息。
Nat Genet. 2021 Jan;53(1):65-75. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00748-0. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction.泛癌分析表明,将多基因风险评分与可改变的风险因素相结合可以提高风险预测。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 27;11(1):6084. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19600-4.
5
A Custom Genotyping Array Reveals Population-Level Heterogeneity for the Genetic Risks of Prostate Cancer and Other Cancers in Africa.定制基因分型阵列揭示了非洲人群中前列腺癌和其他癌症遗传风险的群体水平异质性。
Cancer Res. 2020 Jul 1;80(13):2956-2966. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2165. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Polygenic and clinical risk scores and their impact on age at onset and prediction of cardiometabolic diseases and common cancers.多基因和临床风险评分及其对发病年龄和心血管代谢疾病及常见癌症预测的影响。
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):549-557. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0800-0. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
7
Genotyping Array Design and Data Quality Control in the Million Veteran Program.百万老兵计划中的基因分型阵列设计和数据质量控制。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Apr 2;106(4):535-548. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.03.004.
8
Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study.多基因风险定制前列腺癌筛查:一项获益-危害和成本效益建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 20;16(12):e1002998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002998. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Harmonizing Genetic Ancestry and Self-identified Race/Ethnicity in Genome-wide Association Studies.全基因组关联研究中遗传祖源与自我认定的种族/族群的协调。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Oct 3;105(4):763-772. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification.比较乳腺癌风险预测模型的验证及对未来风险分层的预测。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Mar 1;112(3):278-285. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz113.