Neurosurgery Department, Atatürk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Neurosurgery Department, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
World Neurosurg. 2022 Sep;165:e750-e756. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.143. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
There are currently no standard criteria for evaluating the risk of recurrent disk herniation after surgical repair. This study investigated the predictive values of 5 presurgical imaging parameters: paraspinal muscle quality, annular tear size, Modic changes, modified Phirrmann disk degeneration grade, and presence of sacralization or fusion.
Between 2015 and 2018, 188 patients (89 female, 99 male, median age 50) receiving first corrective surgery for lumbar disk herniation were enrolled. Microdiskectomy was performed in 161 of these patients, and endoscopic translaminar diskectomy approach was performed in 27 patients. Clinical status was evaluated before surgery and 4, 12, and 24 months post surgery using a visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36.
Recurrent disk herniation was observed in 21 of 188 patients. Seventeen of the recurrent disk herniations were seen in those who underwent microdiskectomy and 4 in those who underwent endoscopic translaminar diskectomy. There were significant differences in visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36 scores at 4, 12, and 24 months between patients with recurrence and the 167 no-recurrence patients. The median annular tear length was significantly greater in patients with recurrence than without recurrence. In addition, there were significant differences in recurrence rate according to Modic change type distribution, sacralization or fusion presence, Pfirmann disk; degeneration grade distribution, dichotomized annular tear size, dichotomized Modic change; and type and simplified 3-tier muscle degeneration classification distribution.
Patients with poor clinical scores and recurrence exhibited additional radiologic abnormalities before surgery, such as poor paraspinal muscle quality, longer annular tears, higher Modic change type, higher modified Phirrmann disk degeneration grade, and sacralization or fusion. This risk evaluation protocol may prove valuable for patient selection, surgical planning, and choice of postoperative recovery regimen.
目前尚无评估手术修复后椎间盘突出复发风险的标准标准。本研究调查了 5 种术前影像学参数的预测值:椎旁肌质量、环形撕裂大小、Modic 改变、改良 Phirrmann 椎间盘退变分级以及存在骶骨化或融合。
2015 年至 2018 年间,纳入了 188 名(女性 89 名,男性 99 名,中位年龄 50 岁)因腰椎间盘突出症接受初次矫正手术的患者。其中 161 例患者行微椎间盘切除术,27 例行内镜经椎板间椎间盘切除术。使用视觉模拟评分法、Oswestry 残疾指数和简短形式 36 分别在术前、术后 4、12 和 24 个月评估临床状态。
188 例患者中有 21 例出现复发性椎间盘突出。17 例复发见于行微椎间盘切除术的患者,4 例见于行内镜经椎板间椎间盘切除术的患者。在 4、12 和 24 个月时,复发组与 167 例无复发组患者的视觉模拟评分、Oswestry 残疾指数和简短形式 36 评分均有显著差异。复发组的环形撕裂长度中位数明显大于无复发组。此外,根据 Modic 改变类型分布、骶骨化或融合存在、Pfirmann 椎间盘退变分级分布、二分法环形撕裂大小、二分法 Modic 改变以及类型和简化 3 级肌肉退变分类分布,复发率存在显著差异。
临床评分较差且有复发的患者在术前存在其他影像学异常,如椎旁肌质量差、环形撕裂较大、Modic 改变类型较高、改良 Phirrmann 椎间盘退变分级较高以及骶骨化或融合。这种风险评估方案可能对患者选择、手术计划和选择术后康复方案有价值。