MacLean Mark A, Kureshi Nelofar, Shankar Jai, Stewart Samuel A, Christie Sean D
Division of Neurosurgery, Dalhousie University.
Division of Neuroradiology, Diagnostic Imaging, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre.
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 May 1;34(4):E205-E210. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001076.
Retrospective cohort study.
To examine the relationship between preoperative Modic change (MC) and postoperative clinical assessment scores for patients receiving lumbar discectomy or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disk herniation.
Lumbar disk herniation is a risk factor for MC development. MC on spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been associated with worse preoperative and postoperative clinical assessment scores.
We reviewed data for 285 primary single-level surgeries. Preoperative and 12-month postoperative assessment scores were recorded using the visual analog scale leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary. MC subgroup on preoperative MRI was recorded by a single neuroradiologist.
One hundred seventy-nine patients (female, 56%; age-53±13 y) with preoperative MRI were included. Age and sex were similar across MC subgroups. The sample prevalence of MC on preoperative MRI was 62%, and MC2 was the most common subgroup (35%). No differences in preoperative assessment scores were identified, regardless of presence or absence of MC. For the overall cohort, improvement in assessment scores were observed: Short Form-36 improved an average of 8.2 points [95% CI (95% CI), 5.8-10.7], Oswestry Disability Index by 11.3 points (95% CI, 8.7-14.0), and visual analog scale by 2.8 points (95% CI, 2.1-3.5). In nearly all cases, MCID values were met, even when stratifying by MC subgroup. Few differences in postoperative assessment scores were identified when comparing across MC1, MC2, or no MC groups.
Statistically and clinically significant improvement in postoperative clinical assessment scores was observed for both lumbar discectomy and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion groups. MC on preoperative MRI was not associated with worse preoperative or postoperative clinical assessment scores.
Level III.
回顾性队列研究。
探讨接受腰椎间盘切除术或经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者术前Modic改变(MC)与术后临床评估评分之间的关系。
腰椎间盘突出症是MC发生的一个危险因素。脊柱磁共振成像(MRI)上的MC与术前和术后较差的临床评估评分相关。
我们回顾了285例初次单节段手术的数据。使用视觉模拟量表腿痛、Oswestry功能障碍指数和简明健康调查量表身体成分汇总表记录术前和术后12个月的评估评分。术前MRI上的MC亚组由一名神经放射科医生记录。
纳入179例术前行MRI检查的患者(女性占56%;年龄53±13岁)。各MC亚组的年龄和性别相似。术前MRI上MC的样本患病率为62%,MC2是最常见的亚组(35%)。无论有无MC,术前评估评分均无差异。对于整个队列,观察到评估评分有所改善:简明健康调查量表身体成分汇总表平均提高8.2分[95%可信区间(95%CI),5.8 - 10.7],Oswestry功能障碍指数提高11.3分(95%CI,8.7 - 14.0),视觉模拟量表提高2.8分(95%CI,2.1 - 3.5)。几乎在所有情况下,即使按MC亚组分层,也达到了最小临床重要差异(MCID)值。比较MC1、MC2或无MC组时,术后评估评分几乎没有差异。
腰椎间盘切除术和经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术组术后临床评估评分在统计学和临床上均有显著改善。术前MRI上的MC与术前或术后较差的临床评估评分无关。
三级。