• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饮食受思维方式影响:认知风格对食物感知及行为影响的综述

You Eat How You Think: A Review on the Impact of Cognitive Styles on Food Perception and Behavior.

作者信息

Beekman Thadeus L, Crandall Philip Glen, Seo Han-Seok

机构信息

Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA.

出版信息

Foods. 2022 Jun 25;11(13):1886. doi: 10.3390/foods11131886.

DOI:10.3390/foods11131886
PMID:35804702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9265608/
Abstract

Sensory perception is understood to be a complex area of research that requires investigations from a variety of different perspectives. Although researchers have tried to better understand consumers' perception of food, one area that has been minimally explored is how psychological cognitive theories can help them explain consumer perceptions, behaviors, and decisions in food-related experiences. The concept of cognitive styles has existed for nearly a century, with the majority of cognitive style theories existing along a continuum with two bookends. Some of the more common theories such as individualist-collectivist, left-brain-right-brain, and convergent-divergent theories each offered their own unique insight into better understanding consumer behavior. However, these theories often focused only on niche applications or on specific aspects of cognition. More recently, the analytic-holistic cognitive style theory was developed to encompass many of these prior theoretical components and apply them to more general cognitive tendencies of individuals. Through applying the analytic-holistic theory and focusing on modern cultural psychology work, this review may allow researchers to be able to answer one of the paramount questions of sensory and consumer sciences: how and why do consumers perceive and respond to food stimuli the way that they do?

摘要

感官知觉被认为是一个复杂的研究领域,需要从各种不同的角度进行调查。尽管研究人员试图更好地理解消费者对食物的感知,但一个极少被探索的领域是心理认知理论如何帮助他们解释消费者在与食物相关的体验中的感知、行为和决策。认知风格的概念已经存在了近一个世纪,大多数认知风格理论沿着一个连续体存在,有两个端点。一些更常见的理论,如个人主义 - 集体主义、左脑 - 右脑以及聚合 - 发散理论,都为更好地理解消费者行为提供了各自独特的见解。然而,这些理论往往只关注小众应用或认知的特定方面。最近,分析 - 整体认知风格理论被开发出来,以涵盖许多这些先前的理论成分,并将它们应用于个体更一般的认知倾向。通过应用分析 - 整体理论并关注现代文化心理学研究,本综述可能使研究人员能够回答感官和消费者科学中最重要的问题之一:消费者如何以及为何以他们的方式感知和回应食物刺激?

相似文献

1
You Eat How You Think: A Review on the Impact of Cognitive Styles on Food Perception and Behavior.饮食受思维方式影响:认知风格对食物感知及行为影响的综述
Foods. 2022 Jun 25;11(13):1886. doi: 10.3390/foods11131886.
2
Development and validation of a food-related analysis-holism scale (F-AHS).食品相关分析整体主义量表(F-AHS)的编制与验证。
J Food Sci. 2023 Mar;88(S1):205-226. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16504. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Analytic-holistic cognitive styles affect consumer responses to food and beverage samples during sensory evaluation.分析-整体认知风格会影响消费者在感官评价过程中对食品和饮料样品的反应。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2023 Nov 10;8:100635. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100635. eCollection 2024.
4
Influence of consumers' cognitive style on results from projective mapping.消费者认知风格对投射映射结果的影响。
Food Res Int. 2017 Sep;99(Pt 1):693-701. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Explaining Consumer Safe Food Handling Through Behavior-Change Theories: A Systematic Review.通过行为改变理论解释消费者安全食品处理行为:一项系统综述
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2017 Nov;14(11):609-622. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2017.2288. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
6
[Role of the implicit theories of intelligence in learning situations].[智力的内隐理论在学习情境中的作用]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):456-63. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95460-7.
7
Assessment of nutrition-focused mobile apps' influence on consumers' healthy food behaviour and nutrition knowledge.评估以营养为重点的移动应用程序对消费者健康食品行为和营养知识的影响。
Food Res Int. 2020 Feb;128:108766. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108766. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Conspiratorial Beliefs and Cognitive Styles: An Integrated Look on Analytic Thinking, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Reasoning in Relation to (Dis)trust in Conspiracy Theories.阴谋论信念与认知风格:关于分析性思维、批判性思维和科学推理与对阴谋论的(不)信任之间关系的综合审视。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:736838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838. eCollection 2021.
9
[Study of the categorization process among patients with eating disorders: a new cognitive approach to psychopathology].[饮食失调患者分类过程的研究:精神病理学的一种新认知方法]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):82-91. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82376-0.
10
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Pandemic Recipes-Nutritional Values of Recipes in Legacy Media.大流行食谱——传统媒体中食谱的营养价值
Nutrients. 2025 May 28;17(11):1830. doi: 10.3390/nu17111830.
2
Analytic-holistic cognitive styles affect consumer responses to food and beverage samples during sensory evaluation.分析-整体认知风格会影响消费者在感官评价过程中对食品和饮料样品的反应。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2023 Nov 10;8:100635. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100635. eCollection 2024.
3
Green-Labelled Rice versus Conventional Rice: Perception and Emotion of Chinese Consumers Based on Review Mining.绿色标签大米与传统大米:基于评论挖掘的中国消费者认知与情感
Foods. 2022 Dec 24;12(1):87. doi: 10.3390/foods12010087.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the link between personality and food behavior?个性与饮食行为之间有什么联系?
Curr Res Food Sci. 2021 Dec 8;5:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.12.001. eCollection 2022.
2
Analytic and Holistic Thinkers: Differences in the Dynamics of Heart Rate Complexity When Solving a Cognitive Task in Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Conditions.分析型与整体型思维者:在场依存和场独立条件下解决认知任务时心率复杂性动态变化的差异。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 26;12:762225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762225. eCollection 2021.
3
Impact of consumer global-local identity on attitude towards and intention to buy local foods.消费者全球 - 本土身份对其对本地食品的态度及购买意愿的影响。
Food Qual Prefer. 2022 Mar;96:104428. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104428. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
4
Development and Validation of the Holistic Cognition Scale.整体认知量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:551623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.551623. eCollection 2021.
5
Individual differences in thinking style and dealing with contradiction: The mediating role of mixed emotions.思维风格和处理矛盾的个体差异:混合情绪的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257864. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparing Meal Satisfaction Based on Different Types of Tableware: An Experimental Study of Japanese Cuisine Culture.基于不同类型餐具的用餐满意度比较:日本饮食文化的实验研究
Foods. 2021 Jul 4;10(7):1546. doi: 10.3390/foods10071546.
7
Do Experiences Studying Abroad Promote Dialectical Thinking? Empirical Evidence From Chinese International Students.出国留学经历能促进辩证思维吗?来自中国留学生的实证证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:595935. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.595935. eCollection 2021.
8
Getting started with virtual reality for sensory and consumer science: Current practices and future perspectives.虚拟现实在感官和消费科学中的应用:当前实践与未来展望。
Food Res Int. 2021 Jul;145:110410. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110410. Epub 2021 May 12.
9
Differences in Hedonic Responses, Facial Expressions and Self-Reported Emotions of Consumers Using Commercial Yogurts: A Cross-Cultural Study.使用商业酸奶的消费者享乐反应、面部表情和自我报告情绪的差异:一项跨文化研究。
Foods. 2021 May 29;10(6):1237. doi: 10.3390/foods10061237.
10
Effect of physiological factors, pathologies, and acquired habits on the sweet taste threshold: A systematic review and meta-analysis.生理因素、病理学和习得习惯对甜味阈值的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Nov;19(6):3755-3773. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12643. Epub 2020 Oct 10.