Gupta Mitali, Torrico Damir D, Hepworth Graham, Gras Sally L, Ong Lydia, Cottrell Jeremy J, Dunshea Frank R
School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Future Food Hallmark Research Initiative Project, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Foods. 2021 May 29;10(6):1237. doi: 10.3390/foods10061237.
Hedonic scale testing is a well-accepted methodology for assessing consumer perceptions but is compromised by variation in voluntary responses between cultures. Check-all-that-apply (CATA) methods using emotion terms or emojis and facial expression recognition (FER) are emerging as more powerful tools for consumer sensory testing as they may offer improved assessment of voluntary and involuntary responses, respectively. Therefore, this experiment compared traditional hedonic scale responses for overall liking to (1) CATA emotions, (2) CATA emojis and (3) FER. The experiment measured voluntary and involuntary responses from 62 participants of Asian (53%) versus Western (47%) origin, who consumed six divergent yogurt formulations (Greek, drinkable, soy, coconut, berry, cookies). The hedonic scales could discriminate between yogurt formulations but could not distinguish between responses across the cultural groups. Aversive responses to formulations were the easiest to characterize for all methods; the hedonic scale was the only method that could not characterize differences in cultural preferences, with CATA emojis displaying the highest level of discrimination. In conclusion, CATA methods, particularly the use of emojis, showed improved characterization of cross-cultural preferences of yogurt formulations compared to hedonic scales and FER.
享乐尺度测试是一种广泛接受的评估消费者感知的方法,但因不同文化间自发反应的差异而受到影响。使用情感词汇或表情符号的多选法(CATA)以及面部表情识别(FER)正逐渐成为消费者感官测试中更强大的工具,因为它们可能分别对自发和非自发反应提供更好的评估。因此,本实验将总体喜好的传统享乐尺度反应与以下三种情况进行了比较:(1)CATA情感;(2)CATA表情符号;(3)FER。该实验测量了62名参与者(其中53%为亚洲人,47%为西方人)的自发和非自发反应,这些参与者食用了六种不同的酸奶配方(希腊酸奶、可饮用酸奶、豆奶酸奶、椰子酸奶、浆果酸奶、曲奇酸奶)。享乐尺度能够区分不同的酸奶配方,但无法区分不同文化群体的反应。对于所有方法而言,对配方的厌恶反应最容易描述;享乐尺度是唯一无法描述文化偏好差异的方法,CATA表情符号表现出最高的区分度。总之,与享乐尺度和FER相比,CATA方法,尤其是表情符号的使用,在描述酸奶配方的跨文化偏好方面表现更佳。