Suppr超能文献

《基于 SMART 目标设定的 12 周核心力量训练对青少年体质和运动态度的影响:一项随机对照试验》

Effects of a SMART Goal Setting and 12-Week Core Strength Training Intervention on Physical Fitness and Exercise Attitudes in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Sport Science, College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.

Center for Sports Modernization and Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7715. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137715.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the impacts of a 12-week core strength training (CST) and goal-setting (GS) program on the core endurance, agility, sprinting, jumping, grip strength, and exercise attitude in a group of adolescents. This study followed a randomized parallel design in which 362 adolescents (age: 14.5 ± 1.07 years; body mass index: 19.82 ± 3.64) were allocated to a GS (n = 89), CST (n = 92), or GS + CST (n = 90) program or to a control group (n = 91). Participants were assessed two times (baseline and postintervention) for the following tests: (i) 50 m dash, (ii) grip strength, (iii) long jump, (iv) 1000 m running for boys and 800 m for girls, (v) core endurance, and (vi) exercise attitude. Significant differences (p < 0.05, η2p = 0.035−0.218) were found between the four groups of the six components of physical fitness and the three components of attitude toward exercise (target attitudes, behavioral habits, and sense of behavioral control). Between-group analysis revealed that the GS + CST had significant advantages (p < 0.05) over the CON in terms of the 50 m dash (Cohen’s d = 0.06), grip strength (Cohen’s d = 0.19_left, 0.31_right), 800/1000 m running (Cohen’s d = 0.41), core endurance (Cohen’s d = 0.95), and sense of behavioral control (Cohen’s d = 0.35). Between-group analysis also revealed that the CST had significant advantages over the CON in terms of grip strength (Cohen’s d = 0.27_left, 0.39_right), 50 m (Cohen’s d = 0.04), long jump (Cohen’s d = 0.21), 800/1000 m (Cohen’s d = 0.09), and core stability (Cohen’s d = 0.63), which were significantly different from CON (p < 0.05). GS differed from CON only on 50 m (Cohen’s d = 0.02) and core stability (Cohen’s d = 0.13) with a small effect (p < 0.05). We conclude that the combined intervention of GS and CST is more effective in promoting fitness in adolescents, i.e., GS + CST > CST and GS + CST > GS.

摘要

这项研究旨在分析为期 12 周的核心力量训练(CST)和目标设定(GS)计划对一组青少年的核心耐力、敏捷性、冲刺、跳跃、握力和锻炼态度的影响。本研究采用随机平行设计,将 362 名青少年(年龄:14.5±1.07 岁;体重指数:19.82±3.64)分为 GS(n=89)、CST(n=92)、GS+CST(n=90)或对照组(n=91)。参与者在两次评估(基线和干预后)中接受以下测试:(i)50 米冲刺,(ii)握力,(iii)跳远,(iv)男孩 1000 米跑和女孩 800 米跑,(v)核心耐力,和(vi)锻炼态度。在六个身体成分和三个锻炼态度成分(目标态度、行为习惯和行为控制感)方面,四个组之间存在显著差异(p<0.05,η2p=0.035-0.218)。组间分析显示,GS+CST 在 50 米冲刺(Cohen's d=0.06)、握力(Cohen's d=0.19_left,0.31_right)、800/1000 米跑(Cohen's d=0.41)、核心耐力(Cohen's d=0.95)和行为控制感(Cohen's d=0.35)方面明显优于 CON。组间分析还显示,CST 在握力(Cohen's d=0.27_left,0.39_right)、50 米冲刺(Cohen's d=0.04)、跳远(Cohen's d=0.21)、800/1000 米跑(Cohen's d=0.09)和核心稳定性(Cohen's d=0.63)方面明显优于 CON,与 CON 差异显著(p<0.05)。GS 仅在 50 米(Cohen's d=0.02)和核心稳定性(Cohen's d=0.13)方面与 CON 存在差异,差异较小(p<0.05)。我们得出结论,GS 和 CST 的联合干预更能有效促进青少年的健康,即 GS+CST>CST 和 GS+CST>GS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aed/9265703/347b2d9f5edd/ijerph-19-07715-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验