• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所心理社会过程量表(PROPSIT)项目水平心理测量学分析在工人中的应用。

Item-Level Psychometric Analysis of the Psychosocial Processes at Work Scale (PROPSIT) in Workers.

机构信息

Instituto de Investigación de Psicología, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Lima 34, Peru.

Centro de Investigación Transdisciplinar en Psicología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Pico de Orizaba 1, Los Volcanes, Cuernavaca 62350, Mexico.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7972. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137972.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19137972
PMID:35805629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9265707/
Abstract

The structural attributes and correlates of items have an effect on their composite scores and exploring them strengthens the content validity of a measure adapted to another context. The objective of this study was to evaluate the item properties of a measure of psychosocial work factors (PWFs). Data were collected through a web platform from 188 Peruvian working adults (men = 101, 50.5%) holding various professions and jobs. The instrument was the Psychosocial Processes at Work Scale (PROPSIT), adapted for the Peruvian context. The distributional characteristics, the efficiency of its response options and its correlates with engagement, occupational self-efficacy, general stress and psychological distress (explored with a coefficient of maximum information and another of monotonic association) were analyzed. It was found that the items were asymmetrically distributed, without statistical normality and with a response tendency at low (for psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs)) and medium (favorable psychosocial resources) levels. The number of efficient response options was lower (approximately five options) than the original structure (seven options). The monotonic associations with gender and age were essentially zero and theoretically converged with the external constructs, except for some items related to job demands. The contributions of the results to the content validity of the PROPSIT and the orientation of working hypotheses about PROPSIT item constructs and measures of work effects are discussed.

摘要

项目的结构属性及其相关性会影响其综合得分,而对其进行探索则可以增强在另一种情境下适应的测量工具的内容有效性。本研究旨在评估一个社会心理工作因素(PWFs)测量工具的项目属性。数据通过网络平台收集了来自 188 名秘鲁成年工作者(男性=101,50.5%),他们从事各种职业和工作。研究工具是针对秘鲁情况改编的工作中的心理社会过程量表(PROPSIT)。分析了分布特征、其反应选项的效率以及与参与度、职业自我效能感、一般压力和心理困扰(通过最大信息系数和单调关联系数进行探索)的相关性。结果发现,项目呈非对称分布,没有统计正态性,且反应倾向处于低(社会心理危险因素(PSRFs))和中(有利的社会心理资源)水平。有效的反应选项数量较少(大约五个选项),而不是原始结构(七个选项)。与性别和年龄的单调关联基本上为零,并且与外部结构理论上是一致的,除了与工作需求相关的一些项目。本文讨论了结果对 PROPSIT 内容有效性的贡献以及关于 PROPSIT 项目结构和工作效果测量的工作假设的方向。

相似文献

1
Item-Level Psychometric Analysis of the Psychosocial Processes at Work Scale (PROPSIT) in Workers.工作场所心理社会过程量表(PROPSIT)项目水平心理测量学分析在工人中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7972. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137972.
2
Parametric and Nonparametric Analysis of the Internal Structure of the Psychosocial Work Processes Questionnaire (PROPSIT) as Applied to Workers.心理社会工作过程问卷(PROPSIT)的内部结构的参数和非参数分析及其在工人中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7970. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137970.
3
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
4
[Exposure to psychosocial stressors at work in the Pays de la Loire region in 2002].[2002年卢瓦尔河地区工作中的心理社会压力源暴露情况]
Encephale. 2007 Mar-Apr;33(2):160-8. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)91546-8.
5
Occupation-differential construct validity of the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) psychological job demands scale with physical job demands items: a mixed methods research.职业差异视角下工作内容问卷(JCQ)心理工作要求量表与体力工作要求项目的构建有效性:混合方法研究。
Ergonomics. 2012;55(4):425-39. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.645887.
6
Validity of a single-item measure of stress symptoms.压力症状单项测量的有效性。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Dec;29(6):444-51. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.752.
7
Ultrashort Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3): A Psychometric Assessment.超短版乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-3):心理测量评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):890. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020890.
8
Validation of the medium and short version of CENSOPAS-COPSOQ: a psychometric study in the Peruvian population.中短版 CENSOPAS-COPSOQ 的验证:秘鲁人群的心理测量学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 7;22(1):910. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13328-0.
9
Occupation-level automation probability is associated with psychosocial work conditions and workers' health: A multilevel study.职业自动化概率与心理社会工作条件和工人健康有关:一项多层次研究。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Feb;64(2):108-117. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23210. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
10
Monitoring psychosocial stress at work: development of the Psychosocial Working Conditions Questionnaire.监测工作中的心理社会压力:心理社会工作条件问卷的编制
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2000;Spec No:59-70. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2000.11105108.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Loss Aversion Scale's psychometric properties in Spain.探索西班牙的损失规避量表的心理测量学特性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 8;14(1):15756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66695-6.
2
Adaptation and validation of the university-to-work success scale among Chinese university graduates.中国大学毕业生从大学到工作成功量表的改编与验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 6;14:1258746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258746. eCollection 2023.
3
Psychometric properties of the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) in a sample of workers.工作人群样本中广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7(GAD-7)的心理测量特性
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 27;14:999242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.999242. eCollection 2023.
4
Review of the psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Spanish version in a sample of Puerto Rican workers.波多黎各工人样本中患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)西班牙语版本的心理测量特性综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 14;14:1024676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1024676. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Key Job Demands and Resources of Nursing Staff: An Integrative Review of Reviews.护理人员的关键工作要求与资源:综述的综合评价
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;11:84. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00084. eCollection 2020.
2
Avoid Cohen's 'Small', 'Medium', and 'Large' for Power Analysis.避免 Cohen 的“小”、“中”和“大”进行功效分析。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;24(3):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.009. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
3
What Does a Single-Item Measure of Job Stressfulness Assess?单项工作压力评估量表评估什么?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 26;16(9):1480. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091480.
4
[Psychosocial working conditions and major depression or depressive disorders: Review of studies].[心理社会工作条件与重度抑郁症或抑郁障碍:研究综述]
Med Pr. 2018 Oct 30;69(5):573-581. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00703. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
6
The Effect of Workplace Bullying Perception on Psychological Symptoms: A Structural Equation Approach.职场霸凌认知对心理症状的影响:一种结构方程方法。
Saf Health Work. 2018 Jun;9(2):210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
7
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.心理学定量研究期刊文章报告标准:APA 出版与传播委员会工作组报告。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25. doi: 10.1037/amp0000191.
8
Work-related stress assessed by a text message single-item stress question.通过短信单项压力问题评估工作相关压力。
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Dec 2;67(8):601-608. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx111.
9
Non-normal Distributions Commonly Used in Health, Education, and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review.健康、教育和社会科学中常用的非正态分布:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 14;8:1602. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01602. eCollection 2017.
10
Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems.工作会使人患上精神疾病吗?对常见心理健康问题的工作相关风险因素进行的系统元综述。
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Mar;74(4):301-310. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104015. Epub 2017 Jan 20.