Suppr超能文献

用于估计股骨矿物质密度的射频超声多光谱测定法的可重复性和准确性以及原发性和废用性骨质疏松症患者股骨脆性评分的鉴别能力。

Reproducibility and Accuracy of the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry for Femoral Mineral Density Estimation and Discriminative Power of the Femoral Fragility Score in Patients with Primary and Disuse-Related Osteoporosis.

作者信息

Lalli Piera, Mautino Claudia, Busso Chiara, Bardesono Francesca, Di Monaco Marco, Lippi Lorenzo, Invernizzi Marco, Minetto Marco Alessandro

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.

Division of Spinal Unit, Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 29;11(13):3761. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133761.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the reproducibility and accuracy of Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) for femoral BMD estimation and the reproducibility and discriminative power of the REMS-derived femoral fragility score. 175 patients with primary and disuse-related osteoporosis were recruited: one femoral Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan and two femoral REMS scans were acquired. No significant test-retest differences were observed for all REMS-derived variables. The diagnostic concordance between DXA and REMS was 63% (Cohen's kappa = 0.31) in patients with primary osteoporosis and 13% (Cohen's kappa: -0.04) in patients with disuse-related osteoporosis. No significant difference was observed between REMS and DXA for either femoral neck BMD (mean difference between REMS and DXA: -0.015 g/cm) or total femur BMD (mean difference: -0.004 g/cm) in patients with primary osteoporosis. Significant differences between the two techniques were observed in patients with disuse-related osteoporosis (femoral neck BMD difference: 0.136 g/cm; total femur BMD difference: 0.236 g/cm). Statistically significant differences in the fragility score were obtained between the fractured and non-fractured patients for both populations. In conclusion, REMS showed excellent test-retest reproducibility, but the diagnostic concordance between DXA and REMS was between minimal and poor. Further studies are required to improve the REMS-derived estimation of femoral BMD.

摘要

我们旨在研究射频超声多光谱法(REMS)用于股骨骨密度(BMD)评估的可重复性和准确性,以及REMS得出的股骨骨折风险评分的可重复性和鉴别能力。招募了175例原发性和废用性骨质疏松患者:进行了一次股骨双能X线吸收法(DXA)扫描和两次股骨REMS扫描。对于所有源自REMS的变量,未观察到显著的重测差异。在原发性骨质疏松患者中,DXA与REMS之间的诊断一致性为63%(科恩kappa系数=0.31),在废用性骨质疏松患者中为13%(科恩kappa系数:-0.04)。在原发性骨质疏松患者中,REMS与DXA在股骨颈BMD(REMS与DXA的平均差异:-0.015 g/cm²)或全股骨BMD(平均差异:-0.004 g/cm²)方面均未观察到显著差异。在废用性骨质疏松患者中观察到两种技术之间存在显著差异(股骨颈BMD差异:0.136 g/cm²;全股骨BMD差异:0.236 g/cm²)。在这两个人群中,骨折患者与未骨折患者在骨折风险评分上均获得了统计学上的显著差异。总之,REMS显示出极好的重测可重复性,但DXA与REMS之间的诊断一致性在最低到较差之间。需要进一步研究以改进REMS得出的股骨BMD估计值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e70/9267756/2cf8c6f5cb32/jcm-11-03761-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验