Liang Mengmeng, Yang Fan, Lu Shasha, Zhu Chen, Wang Juan, Yan Weigang
Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 3;11:20552076251376263. doi: 10.1177/20552076251376263. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Our research aims to assess the quality and reliability of videos related to prostate cancer on TikTok and Bilibili, and to compare content characteristics and information accuracy between the two platforms.
On May 1, 2025, we searched for the top 100 videos using the terms "prostate cancer" on TikTok and "" on Bilibili, resulting in 200 videos. Two independent reviewers evaluated the content of each video using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) score and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN). Both reviewers independently assessed each video's scope, reliability, and overall quality.
Significant differences were observed in GQS and mDISCERN scores between TikTok and Bilibili videos ( < 0.0001 for both). Videos on Bilibili demonstrated superior quality and reliability compared to those on TikTok, as indicated by median GQS scores of 4.00 versus 2.00 and mDISCERN scores of 4.00 versus 2.00, respectively. Videos uploaded by urologists were significantly more reliable and of higher quality than those uploaded by patients ( < 0.001). Similarly, videos focused on disease knowledge and treatment were of higher quality and reliability than those sharing personal experiences ( < 0.01).
Prostate cancer-related videos on Bilibili are generally of higher quality and reliability than those on TikTok. However, videos produced by urologists consistently demonstrated higher quality and reliability compared to those by patients across both platforms. Social media platforms should enhance the review and regulation of medical content to ensure its authenticity and accuracy, while content creators should aim to improve video quality to better meet the needs of a wider audience.
我们的研究旨在评估TikTok和哔哩哔哩上与前列腺癌相关视频的质量和可靠性，并比较两个平台的内容特征和信息准确性。
2025年5月1日，我们在TikTok上使用“前列腺癌”一词搜索了排名前100的视频，在哔哩哔哩上使用“前列腺癌”一词搜索了排名前100的视频，共得到200个视频。两名独立评审员使用全球质量量表（GQS）评分和改良的辨别力（mDISCERN）对每个视频的内容进行评估。两位评审员独立评估每个视频的范围、可靠性和整体质量。
TikTok和哔哩哔哩视频的GQS和mDISCERN评分存在显著差异（两者均<0.0001）。哔哩哔哩上的视频在质量和可靠性方面优于TikTok上的视频，GQS中位数评分分别为4.00对2.00，mDISCERN评分分别为4.00对2.00。泌尿科医生上传的视频比患者上传的视频可靠性显著更高、质量更高（<0.001）。同样，专注于疾病知识和治疗的视频比分享个人经历的视频质量和可靠性更高（<0.01）。
哔哩哔哩上与前列腺癌相关的视频总体质量和可靠性高于TikTok上的视频。然而，在两个平台上，泌尿科医生制作的视频与患者制作的视频相比，始终表现出更高的质量和可靠性。社交媒体平台应加强对医疗内容的审核和监管，以确保其真实性和准确性，而内容创作者应致力于提高视频质量，以更好地满足更广泛受众的需求。
