Suppr超能文献

支持和促进地方当局的健康研究(SERLA):一项探索性研究。

Supporting and enabling health research in a local authority (SERLA): an exploratory study.

机构信息

National Institute for Health Research, Clinical Research Network Wessex, Southampton, UK.

Public Health, Southampton City Council, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 9;22(1):1316. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13396-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of research evidence to underpin public health practice and policy decisions in local government is strongly promoted but its implementation has not been straightforward. This study aimed to explore the factors, relationships and processes that contribute towards accessing, using, and generating research evidence that is relevant to local authority public health and social care and shapes its practice.

METHODS

Semi-structured individual interviews with elected councillors, officers directly involved with public health and social care and with community members from one urban unitary authority in South England were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Fourteen participants took part in the semi-structured interviews. Local knowledge and evidence are prioritised, and anecdotal evidence is valued. The Director of Public Health was the principal source of information and support. Academics were rarely mentioned as information sources, and their involvement was ad hoc. The use of research evidence varied between individuals and departments, with wider engagement among public health specialists. Key barriers to the use of research evidence included access (not reported among public health professionals), research timeliness, local applicability, competence in finding and interpreting evidence and the role of research evidence within a political context. Public health and adult social care teams are not currently research active or research ready. Major barriers exist due to financial constraints and the socio-political context of local authorities. COVID-19 disrupted siloed ways of working, strengthening and opening potential collaborations within the local authority. This changed perspectives about the value of research but is likely time-limited unless underpinned by sustainable funding.

CONCLUSION

Creating strategic level roles within local government to work with the Director of Public Health to champion the research agenda and embedding researchers within and across teams would build capacity for local authorities to sustainably co-create, undertake, and use evidence to better inform future actions.

摘要

背景

尽管强烈提倡将研究证据用于支持地方政府的公共卫生实践和政策决策,但其实践并非一帆风顺。本研究旨在探讨有助于获取、使用和生成与地方当局公共卫生和社会保健相关并塑造其实践的研究证据的因素、关系和过程。

方法

对英格兰南部一个城市单一管理区的民选议员、直接参与公共卫生和社会保健工作的人员以及社区成员进行了半结构式个人访谈。访谈进行了录音、逐字记录,并进行了主题分析。

结果

14 名参与者参加了半结构式访谈。地方知识和证据是优先考虑的,并且重视轶事证据。公共卫生主任是主要的信息和支持来源。学术界很少被提及为信息来源,其参与是临时性的。研究证据的使用因人而异,因部门而异,公共卫生专家的参与更为广泛。使用研究证据的主要障碍包括获取(公共卫生专业人员未报告)、研究及时性、地方适用性、查找和解释证据的能力以及研究证据在政治背景下的作用。公共卫生和成人社会保健团队目前并非具有研究能力或准备好进行研究。由于财政限制和地方当局的社会政治背景,存在重大障碍。COVID-19 打破了孤立的工作方式,加强并开启了地方当局内部和跨部门的潜在合作。这改变了对研究价值的看法,但除非有可持续的资金支持,否则这种情况可能是有限的。

结论

在地方政府内部创建战略级别角色,与公共卫生主任合作,倡导研究议程,并将研究人员嵌入团队内部和跨团队,将为地方当局建立可持续的共同创造、开展和使用证据的能力,以更好地为未来的行动提供信息。

相似文献

9

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Making the most of public health research.充分利用公共卫生研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(4):673-674. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy213.
7
Twelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews.进行定性研究访谈的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):1002-1006. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497149. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验