Heavey Laura, Wright Rachel, Ryan Muiriosa, Murphy Edward, Blake Martina, Cloney Ben, Kavanagh Paul, Doyle Frank
Department of Public Health Medicine, HSE Midlands, Tullamore, Ireland.
HSE Communications, Dublin, Ireland.
Tob Prev Cessat. 2022 Jun 24;8:24. doi: 10.18332/tpc/149910. eCollection 2022.
While promising evidence from trials of social-media-based stop smoking support informs service-planning, there is a need for more prospective, observational studies of smoking cessation interventions to build 'real-world' evidence. Specifically, user experiences have been under-explored with qualitative methods to date. This mixed-method evaluation of a closed Facebook group-based behavioral stop smoking support program, which was conducted in Ireland in 2018, aimed to address these issues.
Pre- and post-program surveys measured smoking abstinence (self-reported 7-day point prevalence), changes in smoking attitudes and behavior, and participant experiences. Engagement with Facebook was measured through counting 'likes' and comments, and was used to categorize groups as 'more active' and 'less active' over a 12-week period of support. Thematic content analysis of semi-structured participant interviews explored program experience in depth.
In total, 13 of 52 participants reported smoking abstinence post-program (25.0%, 95% CI: 14.0-39.0). Participant engagement with Facebook was variable and decreased over the program. Membership of a 'more active' group was associated with better reported participant experience (e.g. 90.9% agreeing 'Facebook group helped me to quit or reduce smoking', versus 33.3% in the 'less active' group, p<0.05). Qualitative analysis identified three over-arching themes: importance of social interactions; perception of health information; and appeal of online support.
Facebook can be used to deliver group-based behavioral stop smoking support in the real world. In Ireland, the one-month post-program abstinence outcomes achieved by other stop smoking services is approximately 50%, and while the outcomes for this service was lower (25%), it is still better than outcomes estimated for unassisted quitting. Engagement and peer-to-peer interactivity should be maximized to support positive participant experience.
虽然基于社交媒体的戒烟支持试验提供了有前景的证据,为服务规划提供了参考,但仍需要更多前瞻性的观察性研究来构建关于戒烟干预措施的“真实世界”证据。具体而言,迄今为止,用户体验尚未通过定性方法得到充分探索。2018年在爱尔兰进行的这项对基于Facebook封闭群组的行为戒烟支持项目的混合方法评估旨在解决这些问题。
项目前后的调查测量了戒烟情况(自我报告的7天点患病率)、吸烟态度和行为的变化以及参与者的体验。通过计算“点赞”和评论来衡量对Facebook的参与度,并用于在为期12周的支持期内将群组分类为“更活跃”和“不太活跃”。对参与者半结构化访谈的主题内容分析深入探讨了项目体验。
在52名参与者中,共有13人在项目结束后报告戒烟(25.0%,95%置信区间:14.0 - 39.0)。参与者对Facebook的参与度各不相同,且在项目过程中有所下降。“更活跃”群组的成员报告的参与者体验更好(例如,90.9%的人同意“Facebook群组帮助我戒烟或减少吸烟”,而“不太活跃”群组中这一比例为33.3%,p<0.05)。定性分析确定了三个总体主题:社交互动的重要性;对健康信息的认知;以及在线支持的吸引力。
Facebook可用于在现实世界中提供基于群组的行为戒烟支持。在爱尔兰,其他戒烟服务在项目结束后一个月的戒烟率约为50%,虽然该服务的结果较低(25%),但仍优于无辅助戒烟的估计结果。应最大限度地提高参与度和 peer-to-peer 互动性,以支持积极的参与者体验。 (注:“peer-to-peer”直译为“对等的、点对点的”,这里结合语境可理解为“同伴之间的”,但由于要求不添加解释,所以保留英文。)