Zhang Jin-Zhu, Chen Hao, Wang Xin, Xu Kan
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jun 6;10(16):5230-5240. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i16.5230.
The prognosis of cerebrovascular diseases treated with mechanical ventilation during perioperative has not been clearly reported.
To analyze mortality and functional disability and to determine predictors of unfavorable outcome in the patients with cerebrovascular diseases treated with mechanical ventilation.
A retrospective follow-up study of 111 cerebrovascular disease patients who underwent mechanical ventilation during the perioperative period in the First Hospital of Jilin University from June 2016 to June 2019 was performed. Main measurements were mortality and functional outcome in-hospital and after 3-month follow-up. According to the modified rankin scale (mRS), the functional outcome was divided into three groups: Good recovery (mRS ≤ 3), severe disability (mRS = 4 or 5) and death (mRS = 6). Univariate analysis was used to compare the differences between three functional outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to for risk factors of mortality and severe disability.
The average age of 111 patients was 56.46 ± 12.53 years, 59 (53.15%) were males. The mortality of in-hospital and 3-month follow-up were 36.9% and 45.0%, respectively. Of 71 discharged patients, 46.47% were seriously disabled and 12.67% died after three months follow-up. Univariate analysis showed that preoperative glasgow coma scale, operation start time and ventilation reasons had statistically significant differences in different functional outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the cause of ventilation was related to the death and poor prognosis of patients with cerebrovascular diseases. Compared with brainstem compression, the risk of death or severe disability of pulmonary disease, status epilepticus, impaired respiratory center function, and shock were 0.096 (95%CI: 0.028-0.328), 0.026 (95%CI: 0.004-0.163), 0.095 (95%CI: 0.013-0.709), 0.095 (95%CI: 0.020-0.444), respectively.
The survival rate and prognostic outcomes of patients with cerebrovascular diseases treated with mechanical ventilation during the perioperative period were poor. The reason for mechanical ventilation was a statistically significant predictor for mortality and severe disability.
围手术期接受机械通气治疗的脑血管疾病患者的预后情况尚未得到明确报道。
分析围手术期接受机械通气治疗的脑血管疾病患者的死亡率和功能残疾情况,并确定不良预后的预测因素。
对吉林大学第一医院2016年6月至2019年6月期间围手术期接受机械通气治疗的111例脑血管疾病患者进行回顾性随访研究。主要测量指标为住院期间及3个月随访后的死亡率和功能结局。根据改良Rankin量表(mRS),将功能结局分为三组:恢复良好(mRS≤3)、重度残疾(mRS = 4或5)和死亡(mRS = 6)。采用单因素分析比较三种功能结局之间的差异。采用多因素logistic回归分析死亡率和重度残疾的危险因素。
111例患者的平均年龄为56.46±12.53岁,男性59例(53.15%)。住院期间和3个月随访时的死亡率分别为36.9%和45.0%。在71例出院患者中,46.47%严重残疾,12.67%在3个月随访后死亡。单因素分析显示,术前格拉斯哥昏迷量表、手术开始时间和通气原因在不同功能结局中存在统计学显著差异。多因素logistic回归分析显示,通气原因与脑血管疾病患者的死亡和预后不良有关。与脑干受压相比,肺部疾病、癫痫持续状态、呼吸中枢功能受损和休克导致死亡或重度残疾的风险分别为0.096(95%CI:0.028 - 0.328)、0.026(95%CI:0.004 - 0.163)、0.095(95%CI:0.013 - 0.709)、0.095(95%CI:0.020 - 0.444)。
围手术期接受机械通气治疗的脑血管疾病患者的生存率和预后较差。机械通气的原因是死亡率和重度残疾的统计学显著预测因素。