Lüke Florian, Harrer Dennis Christoph, Pantziarka Pan, Pukrop Tobias, Ghibelli Lina, Gerner Christopher, Reichle Albrecht, Heudobler Daniel
Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Division of Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Regensburg, Germany.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 24;12:900985. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.900985. eCollection 2022.
The combinatory use of drugs for systemic cancer therapy commonly aims at the direct elimination of tumor cells through induction of apoptosis. An alternative approach becomes the focus of attention if biological changes in tumor tissues following combinatory administration of regulatorily active drugs are considered as a therapeutic aim, e.g., differentiation, transdifferentiation induction, reconstitution of immunosurveillance, the use of alternative cell death mechanisms. Editing of the tumor tissue establishes new biological 'hallmarks' as a 'pressure point' to attenuate tumor growth. This may be achieved with repurposed, regulatorily active drug combinations, often simultaneously targeting different cell compartments of the tumor tissue. Moreover, tissue editing is paralleled by decisive functional changes in tumor tissues providing novel patterns of target sites for approved drugs. Thus, agents with poor activity in non-edited tissue may reveal new clinically meaningful outcomes. For tissue editing and targeting edited tissue novel requirements concerning drug selection and administration can be summarized according to available clinical and pre-clinical data. Monoactivity is no pre-requisite, but combinatory bio-regulatory activity. The regulatorily active dose may be far below the maximum tolerable dose, and besides inhibitory active drugs stimulatory drug activities may be integrated. Metronomic scheduling often seems to be of advantage. Novel preclinical approaches like functional assays testing drug combinations in tumor tissue are needed to select potential drugs for repurposing. The two-step drug repurposing procedure, namely establishing novel functional systems states in tumor tissues and consecutively providing novel target sites for approved drugs, facilitates the systematic identification of drug activities outside the scope of any original clinical drug approvals.
用于全身性癌症治疗的药物联合使用通常旨在通过诱导凋亡直接消除肿瘤细胞。如果将调节活性药物联合给药后肿瘤组织中的生物学变化视为治疗目标,例如诱导分化、转分化、重建免疫监视、使用替代细胞死亡机制,那么另一种方法就成为关注焦点。对肿瘤组织进行编辑可建立新的生物学“特征”作为减弱肿瘤生长的“压力点”。这可以通过重新利用的、具有调节活性的药物组合来实现,这些组合通常同时靶向肿瘤组织的不同细胞区室。此外,组织编辑伴随着肿瘤组织中决定性的功能变化,为已批准药物提供了新的靶点模式。因此,在未编辑组织中活性较差的药物可能会揭示新的具有临床意义的结果。根据现有的临床和临床前数据,可以总结出关于组织编辑和靶向编辑组织在药物选择和给药方面的新要求。单活性不是先决条件,而是联合生物调节活性。调节活性剂量可能远低于最大耐受剂量,并且除了抑制性活性药物外,还可以整合刺激性药物活性。节律性给药似乎往往具有优势。需要新的临床前方法,如在肿瘤组织中测试药物组合的功能测定,以选择具有重新利用潜力的药物。两步药物重新利用程序,即在肿瘤组织中建立新的功能系统状态并随后为已批准药物提供新的靶点,有助于系统地识别超出任何原始临床药物批准范围的药物活性。