Yue Qiuhai, Martin Randi C
Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 23;16:890483. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.890483. eCollection 2022.
The neural basis of phonological working memory (WM) was investigated through an examination of the effects of irrelevant speech distractors and disruptive neural stimulation from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Embedded processes models argue that the same regions involved in speech perception are used to support phonological WM whereas buffer models assume that a region separate from speech perception regions is used to support WM. Thus, according to the embedded processes approach but not the buffer approach, irrelevant speech and TMS to the speech perception region should disrupt the decoding of phonological WM representations. According to the buffer account, decoding of WM items should be possible in the buffer region despite distraction and should be disrupted with TMS to this region. Experiment 1 used fMRI and representational similarity analyses (RSA) with a delayed recognition memory paradigm using nonword stimuli. Results showed that decoding of memory items in the speech perception regions (superior temporal gyrus, STG) was possible in the absence of distractors. However, the decoding evidence in the left STG was susceptible to interference from distractors presented during the delay period whereas decoding in the proposed buffer region (supramarginal gyrus, SMG) persisted. Experiment 2 examined the causal roles of the speech processing region and the buffer region in phonological WM performance using TMS. TMS to the SMG during the early delay period caused a disruption in recognition performance for the memory nonwords, whereas stimulations at the STG and an occipital control region did not affect WM performance. Taken together, results from the two experiments are consistent with predictions of a buffer model of phonological WM, pointing to a critical role of the left SMG in maintaining phonological representations.
通过考察无关言语干扰物和经颅磁刺激(TMS)产生的破坏性神经刺激的影响,对语音工作记忆(WM)的神经基础进行了研究。嵌入过程模型认为,参与言语感知的相同区域被用于支持语音工作记忆,而缓冲模型则假定,一个与言语感知区域分离的区域被用于支持工作记忆。因此,根据嵌入过程方法而非缓冲方法,无关言语和对言语感知区域的TMS应该会破坏语音工作记忆表征的解码。根据缓冲模型,尽管存在干扰,工作记忆项目在缓冲区域仍应能够解码,而对该区域进行TMS则会破坏解码。实验1使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和表征相似性分析(RSA),采用非词刺激的延迟识别记忆范式。结果表明,在没有干扰物的情况下,言语感知区域(颞上回,STG)中的记忆项目解码是可行的。然而,左侧STG中的解码证据容易受到延迟期呈现的干扰物的干扰,而在假定的缓冲区域(缘上回,SMG)中的解码则持续存在。实验2使用TMS研究了言语处理区域和缓冲区域在语音工作记忆表现中的因果作用。在延迟早期对SMG进行TMS会导致对记忆非词的识别表现受到干扰,而对STG和枕叶控制区域的刺激则不会影响工作记忆表现。综合来看,这两个实验的结果与语音工作记忆缓冲模型的预测一致,表明左侧SMG在维持语音表征方面起着关键作用。