• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激活的长时记忆能否保持序列顺序信息?

Can activated long-term memory maintain serial order information?

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14, 8050, Zürich, Switzerland.

University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1301-1312. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01902-3. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-021-01902-3
PMID:33765248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8367891/
Abstract

The maintenance of serial order information is a core component of working memory (WM). Many theoretical models assume the existence of specific serial order mechanisms. Those are considered to be independent from the linguistic system supporting maintenance of item information. This is based on studies showing that psycholinguistic factors strongly affect the ability to maintain item information, while leaving order recall relatively unaffected. Recent language-based accounts suggest, however, that the linguistic system could provide mechanisms that are sufficient for serial order maintenance. A strong version of these accounts postulates serial order maintenance as emerging from the pattern of activation occurring in the linguistic system. In the present study, we tested this assumption via a computational modeling approach by implementing a purely activation-based architecture. We tested this architecture against several experiments involving the manipulation of semantic relatedness, a psycholinguistic variable that has been shown to interact with serial order processing in a complex manner. We show that this activation-based architecture struggles to account for interactions between semantic knowledge and serial order processing. This study fails to support activated long-term memory as an exclusive mechanism supporting serial order maintenance.

摘要

序列信息的维持是工作记忆 (WM) 的核心组成部分。许多理论模型假设存在特定的序列顺序机制。这些机制被认为独立于支持项目信息维持的语言系统。这是基于这样的研究,即心理语言学因素强烈影响维持项目信息的能力,而相对不受顺序回忆的影响。然而,最近基于语言的解释表明,语言系统可以提供足够的序列顺序维持机制。这些解释的一个强烈观点假设,序列顺序维持是从语言系统中发生的激活模式中出现的。在本研究中,我们通过实现一种纯粹基于激活的架构,通过计算建模方法来测试这一假设。我们针对涉及语义相关性操纵的几个实验来测试该架构,语义相关性是一种心理语言学变量,它已被证明以复杂的方式与序列顺序处理相互作用。我们表明,这种基于激活的架构难以解释语义知识和序列顺序处理之间的相互作用。这项研究未能支持激活的长期记忆作为支持序列顺序维持的唯一机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/38b9a32d53d8/13423_2021_1902_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/382444b27f9d/13423_2021_1902_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/f9210a187653/13423_2021_1902_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/f043e7619bef/13423_2021_1902_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/f62926b1fc53/13423_2021_1902_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/e0abf12f99d7/13423_2021_1902_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/38b9a32d53d8/13423_2021_1902_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/382444b27f9d/13423_2021_1902_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/f9210a187653/13423_2021_1902_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/f043e7619bef/13423_2021_1902_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/f62926b1fc53/13423_2021_1902_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/e0abf12f99d7/13423_2021_1902_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d8e/8367891/38b9a32d53d8/13423_2021_1902_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Can activated long-term memory maintain serial order information?激活的长时记忆能否保持序列顺序信息?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1301-1312. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01902-3. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Semantic knowledge constrains the processing of serial order information in working memory.语义知识会限制工作记忆中序列顺序信息的处理。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;47(12):1958-1970. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001031. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
3
The effect of response modality on immediate serial recall in dementia of the Alzheimer type.反应方式对阿尔茨海默病型痴呆即时序列回忆的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2012 Sep;26(5):613-23. doi: 10.1037/a0028796. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
4
Verbal working memory encodes phonological and semantic information differently.言语工作记忆以不同的方式对语音和语义信息进行编码。
Cognition. 2023 Apr;233:105364. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105364. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
Verbal working memory and linguistic long-term memory: Exploring the lexical cohort effect.言语工作记忆和语言长时记忆:探索词汇同现效应。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jul;47(5):997-1011. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00898-5.
6
The effect of semantic relatedness on immediate serial recall and serial recognition.语义关联性对即时系列回忆和系列识别的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Dec;64(12):2425-37. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.604787. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
7
The detrimental effect of semantic similarity in short-term memory tasks: A meta-regression approach.短期记忆任务中语义相似性的有害影响:元回归方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):384-408. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01815-7. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Syntax, morphosyntax, and serial recall: How language supports short-term memory.句法、形态句法和序列回忆:语言如何支持短期记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):174-191. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01203-z. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
9
Does semantic long-term memory impact refreshing in verbal working memory?语义长时记忆是否影响言语工作记忆的刷新?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Sep;45(9):1664-1682. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000657. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
10
A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.系列回忆中的语义不匹配效应:无关言语的词汇间加工证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):515-525. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000596. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Semantic Similarity Effect on Short-Term Memory: Null Effects of Affectively Defined Semantic Similarity.语义相似性对短期记忆的影响:情感定义的语义相似性的零效应
J Cogn. 2024 Feb 12;7(1):24. doi: 10.5334/joc.349. eCollection 2024.
2
Phonological Working Memory Representations in the Left Inferior Parietal Lobe in the Face of Distraction and Neural Stimulation.面对分心和神经刺激时左顶下叶的语音工作记忆表征
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 23;16:890483. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.890483. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The detrimental effect of semantic similarity in short-term memory tasks: A meta-regression approach.短期记忆任务中语义相似性的有害影响:元回归方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):384-408. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01815-7. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
The varying nature of semantic effects in working memory.工作记忆中语义效应的变化性质。
Cognition. 2020 Sep;202:104278. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104278. Epub 2020 May 23.
3
Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production.作为从语言理解和产出中浮现的言语工作记忆。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 12;14:68. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068. eCollection 2020.
4
Chunking and redintegration in verbal short-term memory.言语工作记忆中的分块与整合。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 May;46(5):872-893. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000762. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
Frequency effects on memory: A resource-limited theory.记忆的频率效应:一种资源限制理论。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Jan;127(1):1-46. doi: 10.1037/rev0000161. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
6
Keeping order in the brain: The supramarginal gyrus and serial order in short-term memory.保持大脑有序:缘上回与短期记忆中的序列顺序。
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
7
How does chunking help working memory?组块如何帮助工作记忆?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):37-55. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000578. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
Long-term associative learning predicts verbal short-term memory performance.长期联想学习可预测言语短期记忆表现。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Feb;46(2):216-229. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0759-3.
9
Short-term memory and long-term memory are still different.短期记忆和长期记忆仍然不同。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;143(9):992-1009. doi: 10.1037/bul0000108. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Mapping the brain network of the phonological loop.绘制语音回路的脑网络。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jun;38(6):3011-3024. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23569. Epub 2017 Mar 21.