• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠病毒疫苗接种证书与解除公共卫生和社会措施:伦理考量。

COVID-19 vaccination certificates and lifting public health and social measures: ethical considerations.

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

East Mediterr Health J. 2022 Jun 29;28(6):454-458. doi: 10.26719/emhj.22.023.

DOI:10.26719/emhj.22.023
PMID:35815877
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To reopen society, various countries are planning or have implemented differential public health and social measures (PHSMs) for COVID-19-vaccinated individuals, by exempting these individuals from some of the measures.

AIMS

To examine the ethical considerations raised by differential PHSMs by differrnt countries based on individual vaccination status verified by vaccination certificates.

DISCUSSION

Decisions on whether and when measures should be lifted specifically for vaccinated individuals should be guided by scientific and ethical considerations. These considerations include the public health risks of differential lifting, particularly in a context where a substantial portion of society is not vaccinated; mitigation of inequities and unfair disadvantages for unvaccinated individuals; and whether to permit other health certificates or credentials besides proof of vaccination as alternative options to access specific activities or services, as a way to balance public health and freedom of movement.

CONCLUSION

Vaccination certificates may undermine a population-based approach to COVID-19 vaccination to achieve and accelerate universal lifting of PHSMs, result in unfair and inequitable health and social outcomes, and generate social divisions at a time when solidarity within (and between) countries is necessary to navigate the pandemic and its burdens. Further research on the ethical acceptability and impact of COVID-19 vaccine certificates in countries that have implemented them should be carried out to inform future ethical considerations on this issue.

摘要

背景

为了重新开放社会,各国正在计划或已经实施针对 COVID-19 疫苗接种者的差异化公共卫生和社会措施(PHSMs),豁免这些人遵守部分措施。

目的

根据疫苗接种证书验证的个人疫苗接种状况,考察各国实施差异化 PHSMs 所引发的伦理问题。

讨论

是否以及何时应专门为接种疫苗的人解除措施,应基于科学和伦理考虑做出决定。这些考虑因素包括差异化解除措施的公共卫生风险,特别是在社会上很大一部分人未接种疫苗的情况下;减轻未接种疫苗者的不公平和不利处境;以及是否允许除疫苗接种证明以外的其他健康证明或证书作为进入特定活动或服务的替代选择,以平衡公共卫生和行动自由。

结论

疫苗接种证书可能会破坏基于人群的 COVID-19 疫苗接种方法,以实现和加速 PHSMs 的普遍解除,导致不公平和不平等的健康和社会结果,并在各国之间需要团结以应对大流行及其负担的时期产生社会分裂。应在实施疫苗接种证书的国家进一步开展有关 COVID-19 疫苗接种证书的伦理可接受性和影响的研究,以为解决这一问题提供未来的伦理考虑。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 vaccination certificates and lifting public health and social measures: ethical considerations.新冠病毒疫苗接种证书与解除公共卫生和社会措施:伦理考量。
East Mediterr Health J. 2022 Jun 29;28(6):454-458. doi: 10.26719/emhj.22.023.
2
Effects of adjusting public health, travel, and social measures during the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccination: a modelling study.调整 COVID-19 疫苗接种期间公共卫生、旅行和社会措施的效果:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):e674-e682. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00167-5. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
3
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
4
A comparative analysis of COVID-19 vaccination certificates in 12 countries/regions around the world: Rationalising health policies for international travel and domestic social activities during the pandemic.全球 12 个国家和地区的 COVID-19 疫苗接种证书比较分析:大流行期间为国际旅行和国内社会活动制定合理的卫生政策。
Health Policy. 2022 Aug;126(8):755-762. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 May 29.
5
COVID-19 differentiated measures for unvaccinated individuals: The need for clear goals and strong justifications.针对未接种疫苗者的 COVID-19 差异化措施:明确目标和强有力理由的必要性。
Vaccine. 2022 Aug 26;40(36):5333-5337. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.051. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
6
Concerns Around Opposition to the Green Pass in Italy: Social Listening Analysis by Using a Mixed Methods Approach.意大利绿通反对者的担忧:使用混合方法的社会倾听分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 16;24(2):e34385. doi: 10.2196/34385.
7
Mandatory vaccinations, the segregation of citizens, and the promotion of inequality in the modern democracy of Greece and other democratic countries in the era of COVID-19.强制性疫苗接种、公民隔离以及在 COVID-19 时代的希腊和其他民主国家的现代民主中促进不平等。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2022 Dec 7;44(4):72. doi: 10.1007/s40656-022-00548-1.
8
The barriers, facilitators and association of vaccine certificates on COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review.疫苗证书对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的障碍、促进因素及其关联:范围综述。
Global Health. 2023 Sep 27;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00969-y.
9
Digital Covid Certificates as Immunity Passports: An Analysis of Their Main Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.数字新冠证书作为免疫护照:对其主要伦理、法律和社会问题的分析。
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Dec;19(4):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10209-4. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
10
Impacts of public health and social measures on COVID-19 in Europe: a review and modified Delphi technique.公共卫生和社会措施对欧洲 COVID-19 的影响:综述和改良德尔菲技术。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 31;11:1226922. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1226922. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Preferences for Introducing a COVID-19 Certificate: A Discrete Choice Experiment in the Netherlands.公众对引入 COVID-19 证书的偏好:荷兰的离散选择实验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Jul;21(4):603-614. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00808-6. Epub 2023 May 8.