Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Medical Scientist Training Program, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Global Health. 2023 Sep 27;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00969-y.
Globally, COVID-19 vaccines have proven to be instrumental for promoting population health by reducing illness from SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine certificates emerged as a potentially promising solution for encouraging vaccination and facilitating the safe reopening of society, however, they were controversial due to criticisms of infringing upon individual rights. While there is extensive literature describing the ethical, legal, and public health implications of vaccine certificates, there is currently a gap in knowledge about the association of vaccine certificates on vaccine uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic and barriers and facilitators to their use.
The objectives of this scoping review are to (i) describe the existing literature on the association of vaccine certificates on the rates of COVID-19 vaccine uptake across several countries and (ii) describe the intrinsic and extrinsic barriers or facilitators that moderate this relationship.
We conducted a scoping review based on PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRSIMA-ScR) guidelines. We searched three bibliographic databases (APA PsychInfo, Embase Classic + Embase, OVID-Medline) and preprint severs during the first week of July 2023. Three reviewers independently screened the studies based on pre-specified eligibility criteria and performed quality assessments of the primary literature and data extraction.
Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. 14 or these were surveys and 2 were modelling studies. The majority documented that vaccine certificates were significantly associated with increased rates of COVID-19 vaccine uptake (n = 12), motivated by factors such as travel/employer requirements, influence from the government/peers, and trust in the safety, efficacy, and science behind COVID-19 vaccines. Three studies had non-significant or mixed findings. Only one study found a significant decrease in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, motivated by pervasive distrust in the QR code-based system of digital vaccine certificates in Russia. Quality of survey studies was generally high.
Our findings provide insights into the existing literature on vaccine certificates association with vaccine uptake in several different jurisdictions and barriers and facilitators to their uptake. This information can be used to guide future examinations of the implementation of vaccine certificates and more effective implementations.
在全球范围内,COVID-19 疫苗已被证明通过减少 SARS-CoV-2 疾病对促进人口健康具有重要作用。疫苗证书作为鼓励接种和促进社会安全重新开放的潜在有希望的解决方案而出现,但由于侵犯个人权利的批评,它们引起了争议。虽然有大量文献描述了疫苗证书在伦理、法律和公共卫生方面的影响,但目前对于 COVID-19 大流行期间疫苗证书与疫苗接种率的关联以及使用它们的障碍和促进因素的知识存在差距。
本综述的目的是:(i) 描述现有文献中关于在几个国家 COVID-19 疫苗接种率方面疫苗证书的关联;(ii) 描述调节这种关系的内在和外在障碍或促进因素。
我们根据 PRISMA 扩展范围综述 (PRISMA-ScR) 指南进行了范围综述。我们在 2023 年 7 月的第一周在三个文献数据库(APA PsychInfo、Embase Classic+Embase、OVID-Medline)和预印本服务器上进行了搜索。三名审查员根据预先指定的纳入标准独立筛选研究,并对主要文献进行质量评估和数据提取。
符合纳入标准的研究有 16 项。其中 14 项是调查研究,2 项是建模研究。大多数研究记录表明,疫苗证书与 COVID-19 疫苗接种率的显著增加有关(n=12),这是由于旅行/雇主要求、来自政府/同行的影响、对 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性、有效性和科学的信任等因素驱动的。三项研究的结果无统计学意义或混合。只有一项研究发现 COVID-19 疫苗接种率显著下降,这是由于俄罗斯普遍不信任基于 QR 码的数字疫苗证书系统。调查研究的质量通常较高。
我们的研究结果提供了关于疫苗证书与几个不同司法管辖区疫苗接种率的关联以及疫苗证书接种的障碍和促进因素的现有文献的见解。这些信息可以用于指导未来对疫苗证书实施情况的审查和更有效的实施。