University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Hangzhou Dianzi University, China.
Health Policy. 2022 Aug;126(8):755-762. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 May 29.
As the unprecedented pandemic of COVID-19 became a major barrier during the past two years, many countries were using the "COVID pass" or COVID-19 vaccination certificates in attempts to facilitate effective international travel and domestic social activities. The difficulty remained in how the "COVID pass" from different countries and regions could be mutually recognised. This study surveys the current practice of COVID-19 vaccination certificates in 12 representative countries/regions around the world and provides a comprehensive mapping of the vaccination certificates in these countries/regions. The study compares and contrasts the vaccination certificates in both format and content, including their primary purposes, international accreditation, naming conventions, recipients' personal information, and the details on vaccines and vaccination. The findings are interpreted in light of implementation practices in each country/region and discussed in relation to their various functions, as well as legal, technical, and ethical considerations. Based on the analysis and discussion recommendations are made on the practice of vaccination certificates in attempts to facilitate effective international travel and domestic social activities.
在过去两年中,COVID-19 大流行成为一个主要障碍,许多国家都在使用“COVID 通行证”或 COVID-19 疫苗接种证书,试图促进有效的国际旅行和国内社会活动。困难仍然在于如何相互承认来自不同国家和地区的“COVID 通行证”。本研究调查了全球 12 个具有代表性的国家/地区目前 COVID-19 疫苗接种证书的使用情况,并全面绘制了这些国家/地区的疫苗接种证书图。该研究比较和对比了格式和内容方面的疫苗接种证书,包括其主要用途、国际认可、命名约定、受种者个人信息以及疫苗和接种细节。研究结果根据每个国家/地区的实施情况进行了解释,并讨论了它们的各种功能以及法律、技术和道德方面的考虑因素。基于分析和讨论,提出了有关疫苗接种证书实践的建议,以促进有效的国际旅行和国内社会活动。