School of Engineering, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, BT37 0QB, United Kingdom.
Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense 400, São Carlos, São Paulo, Zip code 13566-590, Brazil.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022 Jul;244:114004. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.114004. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
Chlorination has historically provided microbiologically safe drinking water in public water supplies. Likewise, chlorine has also been introduced as a low-cost disinfection method in rural and marginalized communities, both at community and household level, as well as during emergencies. Although this practice is common and well established for use as a household water treatment technology in the Global South, several challenges in effective and efficient implementation still need to be addressed. Here, we explored these issues by a literature review and narrowed them to the status of three Latin American countries (Mexico, Colombia, and Brazil). Overall, it was found that although guidance on household-based chlorination includes information on health risks and hygiene, this may not create enough incentive for the user to adapt the method satisfactorily. Physicochemical quality of the water influences chlorination efficiency and it is found that variations in quality are rarely considered when recommending chlorine doses during implementation. These are far more often based on a few measurements of turbidity, thereby not considering dissolved organic matter, or seasonal and day-to-day variations. Other factors such as user preferences, chlorine product quality and availability also represent potential barriers to the sustainable use of chlorination. For chlorination to become a sustainable household water treatment, more focus should therefore be given to local conditions prior to the intervention, as well as support and maintenance of behavioural changes during and after the intervention.
氯化作用在历史上为公共供水提供了微生物安全的饮用水。同样,氯也被引入到农村和边缘社区,无论是在社区层面还是家庭层面,以及在紧急情况下,作为一种低成本的消毒方法。尽管这种做法在全球南方作为家庭水处理技术是常见且成熟的,但仍需要解决一些在有效和高效实施方面的挑战。在这里,我们通过文献回顾探讨了这些问题,并将其缩小到三个拉丁美洲国家(墨西哥、哥伦比亚和巴西)的现状。总的来说,研究发现,尽管基于家庭的氯化指导包括有关健康风险和卫生的信息,但这可能不足以激励用户满意地采用该方法。水质的理化性质会影响氯化效率,并且在实施过程中推荐氯剂量时,很少考虑水质的变化。这些建议往往更多地基于浊度的几次测量,而不考虑溶解有机物,或季节性和日常变化。其他因素,如用户偏好、氯产品质量和可用性,也代表了氯化可持续使用的潜在障碍。因此,为了使氯化成为一种可持续的家庭水处理方法,在干预之前应更加关注当地条件,以及在干预期间和之后支持和维护行为的改变。