Suppr超能文献

Exowalk® 对中风后3个月以上患者进行高强度与低强度机电辅助步态训练的比较。

Comparison of high-intensive and low-intensive electromechanical-assisted gait training by Exowalk® in patients over 3-month post-stroke.

作者信息

Yu Chang Seon, Nam Yeon-Gyo, Kwon Bum Sun

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea.

Institute of Posture Science, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 10;14(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00515-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess the effect of electromechanical-assisted gait training intensity on walking ability in patients over 3-month post-stroke.

METHODS

Data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected under the same study design of assessment and intervention, excluding intervention time per session. After matching the inclusion criteria of two RCTs, the experimental groups of each RCT were defined as low-intensive (LI) and high-intensive (HI) group according to the intervention time per session. Primary outcome was the difference of the change in Functional Ambulatory Categories (FAC) between LI and HI gait training. Secondary outcomes were the difference of changes in mobility, walking speed, walking capacity, leg-muscle strength, balance and daily activity evaluated with Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), 10 m walk test (10MWT), 6-min walk test (6MWT), Motricity Index (MI), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) respectively.

RESULTS

The FAC improved after gait training in both groups. The secondary outcomes also improved in both groups except RMI and MI in HI group. The change of all outcomes were not different between groups except RMI. The change of RMI in the LI group was greater than that in the HI group statistically, but it did not meet minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The improvement of walking ability after LI or HI gait training was not different if providing the same total gait training time. By providing the electromechanical gait training intensively, we could shorten the gait training period to improve walking ability and customize the training program according to the patient training abilities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of the registry: Clinical Research Information Service.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

No. KCT0002195(RCT1), No. KCT0002552(RCT2). Date of registration: 10/04/2016(RCT1), 10/05/2017(RCT2). URL of the trial registry record: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估机电辅助步态训练强度对中风后3个月以上患者步行能力的影响。

方法

在相同的评估和干预研究设计下收集两项随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,但不包括每次训练的干预时间。在匹配两项RCT的纳入标准后,根据每次训练的干预时间,将每项RCT的实验组定义为低强度(LI)组和高强度(HI)组。主要结局是LI和HI步态训练之间功能性步行分类(FAC)变化的差异。次要结局分别是用Rivermead运动指数(RMI)、10米步行试验(10MWT)、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)、运动能力指数(MI)、伯格平衡量表(BBS)和改良巴氏指数(MBI)评估的运动能力、步行速度、步行能力、腿部肌肉力量、平衡和日常活动变化的差异。

结果

两组步态训练后FAC均有改善。除HI组的RMI和MI外,两组的次要结局也均有改善。除RMI外,各结局的变化在组间无差异。LI组RMI的变化在统计学上大于HI组,但未达到最小临床重要差异。

结论

如果提供相同的总步态训练时间,LI或HI步态训练后步行能力的改善没有差异。通过密集提供机电步态训练,可以缩短步态训练周期以提高步行能力,并根据患者的训练能力定制训练方案。

试验注册

注册机构名称:临床研究信息服务中心。

试验注册号

KCT0002195(RCT1),KCT0002552(RCT2)。注册日期:2016年4月10日(RCT1),2017年5月10日(RCT2)。试验注册记录的网址:https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/9275251/af6237cd7f12/13102_2022_515_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验